IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Descent into Victoria, Possible and Actual Strategies
BrianL
post Jul 4 2007, 03:53 AM
Post #91


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



QUOTE (Stu @ Jul 3 2007, 04:00 PM) *
That "ripple" looks a bit, um, big, dontcha think..? unsure.gif


Nah, if you're really motivated to get to the other side, just keep those wheels churning till you break through it. I don't think it's deep enough to hang her up on her belly.

Just wheel.gif wheel.gif wheel.gif laugh.gif

Brian
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 4 2007, 09:18 AM
Post #92


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Jul 4 2007, 12:42 AM) *
I was wondering why they hadn't made any further progress towards entering the crater lately.


I thought the low activity was due to the US holidays.
It wasn't until this morning that I knew about the press release and the issues with high tau / low power.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 4 2007, 03:07 PM
Post #93


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Have a look to these two fhazcam images. ohmy.gif
The first one was taken on sol 1216 at 12:44 right after moving on this site, while the second one is from yestersol, sol 1223 at 11:21. The local times are not exactly the same but quite similar and the shadows seen on the first one almost disappeared on the second picture.

Attached Image Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 4 2007, 03:12 PM
Post #94





Guests






This could be the end of Opportunity.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 4 2007, 03:16 PM
Post #95


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



We're at a low of 400whrs (175 more than Spirit at its worst), with the atmospheric opacity improving. Reports of death are premature.

But - any sol could be the end of Opportunity to be honest. I don't think this dust storm makes it any more or less likely.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 4 2007, 03:49 PM
Post #96


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Thanks for that, Tesheiner. I made an animated gif with this 1217 frame and this 1223 frame. They are only 9 minutes apart in local time, and you can just make out the shadow of the right wheel in the 1223 view, but the shadow of the deck is almost invisible. This really gives you a good sense of how dusty the sky must be. Note that the arm has moved between these frames.

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Jul 4 2007, 04:44 PM
Post #97


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



Reports of impending doom are definitely premature - the Dust storm is clearing so power levels should climb back up into the 600+ range over the next few weeks so long as there are no more storms.

I was very interested to see that my model of the amount of diffuse insolation noticably underestimates the amount of power available when Tau really rises to high numbers - at the stated Tau=3.3 and the current dust loss of 16% my model predicted 360Whr vs the 402Whr that Pando reported.

Assuming that 12% error holds for higher Tau values then Tau would have to rise past 5 and stay there for Opportunity to be in real trouble.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Analyst_*
post Jul 4 2007, 06:17 PM
Post #98





Guests






QUOTE (helvick @ Jul 4 2007, 04:44 PM) *
I was very interested to see that my model of the amount of diffuse insolation noticably underestimates the amount of power available when Tau really rises to high numbers - at the stated Tau=3.3 and the current dust loss of 16% my model predicted 360Whr vs the 402Whr that Pando reported.


Nice dust storm to calibrate the model. smile.gif wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 4 2007, 06:20 PM
Post #99





Guests






They should try and get some sunset/sunrise pictures, could be very colourful?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Pando
post Jul 4 2007, 08:52 PM
Post #100


The Insider
***

Group: Members
Posts: 669
Joined: 3-May 04
Member No.: 73



QUOTE (helvick @ Jul 4 2007, 09:44 AM) *
...at the stated Tau=3.3 and the current dust loss of 16% my model predicted 360Whr vs the 402Whr that Pando reported.

That was actually from the press release that Tom Tamlyn posted earlier wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 4 2007, 09:05 PM
Post #101


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



QUOTE (fredk @ Jul 4 2007, 08:49 AM) *

Attached Image


Man... ohmy.gif ...what a change in such a short time! I wonder if the dust cloud had a discernible edge as seen from the ground. This is one of the most Earth-like changes we've seen on Mars, IMHO.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Jul 5 2007, 01:58 AM
Post #102


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Some Pancam images were taken on sol 1224, no doubt to study the sky during the dust storm. Of course brightness levels of these stretched JPGs are all over the place, but I think it does look dusty. The time was about 3:20 local Mars time.



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Jul 5 2007, 04:08 AM
Post #103


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Interesting animation, Fredk. It is also instructive to make an animation of those two images adjusting the levels of the sunlit areas to be similar in addition to the shadow areas being similar as done previously. The on-the-ground effect is that the shadows appear markedly brighter with increased dust.

Rather the difference between LosAngeles and Palm Springs

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jul 5 2007, 04:15 AM
Post #104


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



The dust seems to have softened the light, making the pancam 1x4 appear prettier than normal on sol 1224. I was waiting for Mike to update the metadata so I could use anti-vignetted images from MMB, but it seems I couldn't fully compensate for the brightness variation between images. I didn't screw with the color balance, because I liked the false color in this set. If someone can correct the brightness banding, this set of pancams will make a gorgeous postcard.
Attached Image


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 5 2007, 05:39 AM
Post #105


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



You're right Cosmic, lovely subtle light here at the moment...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 01:33 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.