Crater relaxation (and volatile transport?) on Ceres |
Crater relaxation (and volatile transport?) on Ceres |
Oct 30 2015, 02:04 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2106 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
That image is 27 meters per pixel, according to the original caption (http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedet...fm?imageId=4662)
I was thinking of Methone in the discussion above too, but this is clearly a very different object from Ceres! There's more than one way to erase craters, even in a vacuum. Fun fact, the little fellow orbits Saturn in almost exactly one Earth day, so the surface experiences pretty much the same cycle we do since it's tidally locked; just a odd coincidence of course... |
|
|
Guest_MichaelPoole_* |
Oct 30 2015, 01:15 PM
Post
#17
|
Guests |
That may seem like a good resolution for other objects, but bear in mind this moon is just 1.6 km across - so the real resolution of this image is just about 59 pixels wide.
To compare, Itokawa was pictured at a resolution up to 70 cm per pixel. |
|
|
Oct 30 2015, 08:00 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 244 Joined: 2-March 15 Member No.: 7408 |
I think that's less "polished ball of ice" than "dusty rubble pile that seems smooth because the photo is low-res and taken from a big distance". I don't think it's a lack of resolution that makes it seem so smooth. The surface is fairly well-resolved. Looking at the limb gives you a good sense of how much detail is provided in the image. It's only a few kilometers across, but according to http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakda...2/05211206.html, that image was captured from a distance of less than 5,000 km by Cassini's narrow-angle camera (angular resolution: 0.00006 radians). http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2013/pdf/1598.pdf says the image has a resolution of 27 meters/pixel, and still shows no visible topography. Both of those sources agree that the surface of Methone is remarkably smooth, with Thomas et al. adding that it and Pallene "have likely developed shapes close to equipotential surfaces". It may still be a "dusty rubble pile"—its extremely low density estimate supports that—but it must be a very smooth one. To merge several sources' descriptive terms, 'icy fluff ball' seems appropriate. Edit: Oh, we've spilled over into page 2. Some of what I just wrote is redundant after reading the posts I missed. |
|
|
Guest_MichaelPoole_* |
Oct 30 2015, 10:21 PM
Post
#19
|
Guests |
Man, Methone is not a few km across. It is just 1.6 km across. That resolution is insufficient to see really fine detail on something so small.
|
|
|
Oct 30 2015, 10:40 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Meanwhile, back on Ceres . . .
|
|
|
Oct 31 2015, 01:47 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2106 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Yep; back on topic, this month's journal is out: http://www.planetary.org/blogs/guest-blogs...ty-of-data.html
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 03:09 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |