IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

24 Pages V  « < 15 16 17 18 19 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Top of Vera Rubin Ridge Part 1, Site 66-67, sol 1812-1943, 11 Sep 2017-23 Jan 2018
fredk
post Dec 20 2017, 05:31 AM
Post #241


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3948
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



This is a newer plan, but not very different:
https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA21720
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sean
post Dec 20 2017, 10:42 AM
Post #242


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 820
Joined: 10-November 15
Member No.: 7837



I was wrong. Here is the ascent area according to the post by Fredk...



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Dec 20 2017, 11:16 PM
Post #243


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1763
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



1910, MS ICE L-NavCam (quick and dirty)
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post Dec 21 2017, 02:00 AM
Post #244


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 795
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



some stereo (cross-eye/anaglyph/parallel) of a couple frames ripped from Sean's absolutely remarkable rendered sequence. The path in the map that Fredk linked a few posts above would run up along the right bank of the channel as seen perhaps most distinctly in the parallel view at right, that sean pointed out a few posts above, though i was too lazy to attempt an oversketch of that route atop the frame.
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nogal
post Dec 21 2017, 04:33 PM
Post #245


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 340
Joined: 15-June 09
From: Lisbon, Portugal
Member No.: 4824



QUOTE (Sean @ Dec 20 2017, 10:42 AM) *
I was wrong. Here is the ascent area according to the post by Fredk...

Here is a vertically exagerated view of the notional route Fred mentions. You can grab a KML file with it from here.
Fernando

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sean
post Dec 22 2017, 09:07 PM
Post #246


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 820
Joined: 10-November 15
Member No.: 7837



Here is a quick pass on a portion of the complete 360...


Detail...





--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Dec 22 2017, 09:33 PM
Post #247


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2824
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (nogal @ Dec 21 2017, 05:33 PM) *
Here is a vertically exagerated view of the notional route Fred mentions. You can grab a KML file with it from here.
Fernando

This is really helpful, thanks Fernardo


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Dec 23 2017, 01:42 AM
Post #248


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1763
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Lovely work Sean....

~5.4 meter drive SE (Midnight Planets) partial L-NavCam, also in the set was a couple of top tier frames featuring the extended drill, but MS ICE would not stitch them on to the others sad.gif

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Dec 23 2017, 11:29 AM
Post #249


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1504
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Sol 1912 Navcam panoramic.



Paul, seriously, trash your Microsoft Ice thing. Maybe it's efficient with common pictures, but Navcam pictures are not common. Use Hugin, or PTGui or something. It will be better wink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sean
post Dec 23 2017, 12:21 PM
Post #250


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 820
Joined: 10-November 15
Member No.: 7837



Another beautiful pano Damia. Do you straighten the horizon yourself? It always seems so 'locked in'. Looking forward to your debayered 1903 360... smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Dec 23 2017, 01:25 PM
Post #251


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2264
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



Hugin finds correspondences itself. But with NavCam this usually doesn't work well. But you can add and remove these correspondences. By choosing such corresponding points near the horizon, you get a "locked" horizon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sean
post Dec 23 2017, 01:51 PM
Post #252


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 820
Joined: 10-November 15
Member No.: 7837



Thanks Gerald... I used Hugin a long time ago so I might give it another look.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Dec 23 2017, 02:12 PM
Post #253


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1504
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



I'm doing it all manually. And all of my panoramas are made with manual settings, never automated process, with Navcam imagery.

And thanks you Sean smile.gif I have a special project for this color panorama.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charborob
post Dec 24 2017, 11:15 PM
Post #254


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 727
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Québec, Canada
Member No.: 3908



Sol 1912 Lmastcam:


I don't understand why some mastcam images are debayered, and some are not.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pdalek
post Dec 28 2017, 12:01 PM
Post #255


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 4-March 14
Member No.: 7145



Does anyone know why MARDI was taking so many images during Sol 1910?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

24 Pages V  « < 15 16 17 18 19 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th November 2019 - 06:02 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.