IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Spacecraft Set to Reach Milestone, Reports Technical Glitches
Jim from NSF.com
post Mar 26 2007, 03:08 PM
Post #61


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Cape Canaveral
Member No.: 734



QUOTE (monitorlizard @ Mar 26 2007, 10:15 AM) *
Imagine the kind of spares lying around from military reconnaissance satellites and what the planetary exploration community could do with them. Oh, those selfish, selfish generals!


Not the same. There is a "production line" for reconsats. Not the same as one time only planetary spacecraft. They would probably use the hardware on the last bird in the series or even put together another vehicle (which had been done before)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jim from NSF.com
post Mar 26 2007, 03:09 PM
Post #62


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Cape Canaveral
Member No.: 734



QUOTE (Tom Tamlyn @ Mar 24 2007, 08:06 AM) *
If I remember correctly, the reason the two spacecraft share the same frequency is that MRO uses a spare X-band communications transponder left over from the Mars Rover program, identical to the transponder on Spirit, and it never occurred to anyone that Spirit would still be roving when MRO began operations in orbit around Mars.
TTT


that is correct
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Mar 28 2007, 06:46 AM
Post #63


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 683
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



QUOTE (Jim from NSF.com @ Mar 26 2007, 05:08 PM) *
Not the same. There is a "production line" for reconsats. Not the same as one time only planetary spacecraft. They would probably use the hardware on the last bird in the series or even put together another vehicle (which had been done before)



As I remember it they had a very hard time finding enough hardware left over at the end of the Corona program to cobble together a satellite for display purposes, and that was after 100+ launches. Essentailly all the test and development hardware had been upgraded to flyable status and launched.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post Aug 27 2007, 09:45 AM
Post #64


Rover Driver
***

Group: Members
Posts: 977
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0708/26mro/

"Alfred McEwen of the University of Arizona, Tucson, principal investigator for the camera, said, "I'm happy to report that there has been no detectable degradation over the past five months." "

"McEwen said, "Given the stability we've seen and understanding the nature of the problem, we now expect HiRISE to return high-quality data for years to come." "

yay!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 10:20 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.