MSL Images & Cameras, technical discussions of images, image processing and cameras |
MSL Images & Cameras, technical discussions of images, image processing and cameras |
Aug 16 2012, 11:05 PM
Post
#1
|
||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
I'm still trying to figure out a number of things about the new images we are trying to work with. Assuming others are likewise trying to learn, I thought I would open this thread to create a place for such discussions.
I'd like to start out with a comment about raw image contrast. There have been several postings in the main threads about whether or not the MSL raw images have been stretched like those from the MER missions. I am certainly no expert on this, but it looks to me as if the MSL images have not been stretched at all. I haven't tried to analyze all of the image types, but the hazcams and navcams have pixel brightness histograms that are very different from their MER counterparts. This attached image compares MER and MSL navcams along with their luminosity histograms. The MSL images clearly are not using the entire, available range of brightness values, whereas the MER raws do. For this reason, the MSL raw images can usually be nicely enhanced by simply stretching the distribution of brightness across the full 256 value range. -------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
||
Sep 13 2012, 11:50 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2920 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
I must admit there's something I don't understand.
I understood that, once the covers of the Hazcam have been removed, they were to kind of hanging somewhere (I mean not on the ground). Looking at the bellypan or whatever you call it, I can't see those covers. Any thoughts? -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 13 2012, 12:38 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 4-May 11 From: Pardubice, CZ Member No.: 5979 |
I must admit there's something I don't understand. I understood that, once the covers of the Hazcam have been removed, they were to kind of hanging somewhere (I mean not on the ground). Looking at the bellypan or whatever you call it, I can't see those covers. Any thoughts? This video explains it all : http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/vi.../index.cfm?v=53 |
|
|
Sep 13 2012, 01:00 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
This video explains it all : http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/multimedia/vi.../index.cfm?v=53 Rotating the video image shows how the cover may be hidden behind the spring. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2024 - 08:10 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |