IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

33 Pages V  « < 10 11 12 13 14 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Journey to Mt Sharp - Part 4: Beyond the Kimberley, Sol 634 [May 19, '14] to 706 [Jul 31, '14]
anticitizen2
post Jun 10 2014, 02:35 PM
Post #166


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 201
Joined: 16-December 13
Member No.: 7067



New sights! Anaglyph pan album for 655
http://imgur.com/a/V5peX

And the stretched version
http://imgur.com/a/TGs8x

I finally managed to 'see' a crosseyed image this weekend, so now anaglyphs feel like putting the training-wheels back on the bike
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Jun 10 2014, 02:59 PM
Post #167


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Great views, anticitizen2!
I think we are seeing the two (already highlighted) circular features in the central frame, probably Curiosity will visit them in next days...


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jun 10 2014, 03:09 PM
Post #168


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10151
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



A quick guess as to our location on sol 655. I will update the map later. (EDIT - I changed the attached file and corrected the location)

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jun 10 2014, 06:56 PM
Post #169


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10151
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



According to https://twitter.com/Matt_Heverly/status/476343275683454976, Curiosity just passed the 7 km mark. Joe's drive log has us over 300 m past that. It's hard to reconcile everything, but I guess I have to go with the project.

Phil



--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jun 10 2014, 08:14 PM
Post #170


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Hmm. Might that number correct for slip?


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jun 10 2014, 08:24 PM
Post #171


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10151
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Yes, that's what is going on, we always have this conflict between numbers.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
algorithm
post Jun 10 2014, 09:17 PM
Post #172


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 11-December 12
From: The home of Corby Crater (Corby-England)
Member No.: 6783



Following on from my previous post (#156), am I to conclude that this is a sequence of shots from an 'autofocus assist' laser?

The other question I had was that if the images were captured minutes apart, why does the ripple effect appear the way it does?

Were they taken minutes apart or just received/uploaded minutes apart?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jun 10 2014, 11:08 PM
Post #173


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Yeah, from what I read the CW laser is used for autofocus. The laser fires and the secondary is stepped through some range of travel, while the returned intensity is monitored. I think the maximum intensity corresponds to the in-focus position. But someone may correct me/elaborate on this. Normally the CW laser is used for focusing but no images are taken/returned while it is running. But it looks like they decided to do that on that sol, maybe to check the alignment of the CW laser.

I assume each firing of the main laser blasts the dust farther out. When the images are combined into an animation it looks like a smooth outwards ripple-like motion, but in reality it happens in short bursts with each main laser pulse.

I think the timestamps correspond to the time the images were taken.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anticitizen2
post Jun 11 2014, 04:15 PM
Post #174


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 201
Joined: 16-December 13
Member No.: 7067



Yesterday's pan album is now complete with the images of the tracks: Sol 655 and stretched

Today's view is even more exciting! Sol 656 anaglyph album
Sol 656 stretched anaglyph album
wheel.gif
Here are the 655 and 656 drives from the HazCam
And the drives anaglyph'd

The first segment of the 656 drive in the NavCam
Two pairs of images looking ahead at the circular features - http://i.imgur.com/293DjsA.gif pancam.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Jun 12 2014, 03:00 PM
Post #175


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



QUOTE (fredk @ Jun 10 2014, 02:53 AM) *
... perhaps to check the alignment.

This presumption appears to be correct. Here the processed PDS previews of three Sol 283 alignment tests:
Targets Sulky_CCAM, East_River, and Long_Island.
Raw ChemCam images contain ghosts and smearing, most obvious for images of bright objects in a dark environment, as in these cases.

Metadata about the ChemCam images confirming the alignment tests can be found in file msl_ccam_obs.csv of this PDS directory.

Excerpt:
QUOTE
283,CR0,422611899,CR0_422611899EDR_F0060082CCAM02283M1.IMG,Image,East_River,ccam
02283,No,5.27021,3.033,1.238, , , , ,1,1, , , 11:25:38:094,6,82,6,Single obs,alignment test,,,,,,Flat Rock Surface
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jun 12 2014, 04:09 PM
Post #176


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Thanks for digging that up, Gerald. I guess they wanted to test the alignment over a range of target distances.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Jun 12 2014, 04:41 PM
Post #177


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



Trying to keep speculation here rather than Map Thread, it seems Marco's northern route is not northern enough. We are now northwest of where the yellow route turned south to join the green provisional route. Does it now look like we will not be joining the green route any time soon, but rather loosely paralleling it 200-300 m to the north?

Marco, maybe you could do a new look ahead from where we are now.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ant103
post Jun 12 2014, 05:33 PM
Post #178


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



Sol 657 Navcam panoramic after such a long drive smile.gif



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Jun 12 2014, 05:36 PM
Post #179


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1465
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



Dustbowl ahoy!

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charborob
post Jun 12 2014, 06:45 PM
Post #180


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1074
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Québec, Canada
Member No.: 3908



There seems to be a problem with your anaglyph. Try this one:
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

33 Pages V  « < 10 11 12 13 14 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 02:03 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.