Juno Perijove 15, September 07, 2018 |
Juno Perijove 15, September 07, 2018 |
Sep 8 2018, 06:42 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 140 Joined: 22-July 14 Member No.: 7220 |
A couple of details using my updated pipeline
https://github.com/kmgill/cassini_processing PJ15-19 PJ15-20 PJ15-21 PJ15-22 PJ15-23 Map projected combination of 22 && 23 |
|
|
Sep 9 2018, 10:12 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 140 Joined: 22-July 14 Member No.: 7220 |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2018, 08:10 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
Here is a link to reprojected images of PJ15, part 2.
I'm currently busy with geometrical calibration for my EPSC talk. I may upload the images to missionjuno and UMSF, after I'll have completed a calibration milestone I've almost accomplished. |
|
|
Sep 12 2018, 12:36 AM
Post
#19
|
||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
I was pleasantly surprised that implementing the flat field correction cleared up the repetitive artifacts without need for any additional masking and filling. (For TDI=1 images) FWIW, my current flat field derived color balance is {0.838223, 1., 2.37871} Should be "Resolution is 30 pixels per degree..." With the flat field, I've conservative in oder to be ready for DCT compressed images, for TDI >> 1, and for energetic particle hits. But with the Huffman encoded images, it may be worth to work directly with the flatfield. People wanted the images redder. So, I changed to red=0.88. But this may be connected to the strong enhancement I'm usually applying, and the physically non-straightforward human color perception of poorly satutated colors. I might investigate the colors more thoroughly at some future point. Thanks for the correction of my text! Late at night, and working on several tasks in parallel, I've to live with making errors. Now, the enhanced reprojections of part 2 of PJ15 I've linked to, above: PJ15, #24: |
|
|
||
Sep 12 2018, 12:38 AM
Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2018, 12:39 AM
Post
#21
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2018, 12:41 AM
Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2018, 12:43 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2018, 01:06 AM
Post
#24
|
|||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
#32, and #33:
Btw., I've completed the calibration milestone. But the above images have been rendered with the parameters I've provided after the posts with the part 1 uploads. Results of the new calibration iteration step are: focal length 1482.29 pixels, optical center (809.09; 609.20), rotation around optical axis 0.00145 radians, K1=-5.75E-8, K2=2.73E-14. The origin (0; 0) of the applied frame is the lower left corner pixel of the CCD (the side with the red filter). But I think, that it's still possible, that the corners of the CCD are off up to 10 pixels with this approximation. However, that's outside the readout regions. Nevertheless, I'll try to narrow this further down with higher-order approximations. |
||
|
|||
Guest_avisolo_* |
Sep 12 2018, 07:27 AM
Post
#25
|
Guests |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2018, 11:53 AM
Post
#26
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
Is this the final tally of images for Perijove 15?
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 12 2018, 01:32 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2511 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Is this the final tally of images for Perijove 15? No, there are still several more to come. [edit: as of 14:36 PDT all of PJ15 should be on missionjuno.] -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Sep 16 2018, 06:07 PM
Post
#28
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 140 Joined: 22-July 14 Member No.: 7220 |
|
|
|
Sep 16 2018, 06:16 PM
Post
#29
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 140 Joined: 22-July 14 Member No.: 7220 |
|
|
|
Sep 16 2018, 10:32 PM
Post
#30
|
|||||||
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2250 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
Image PJ15_23, approximately true color/contrast:
And enhanced versions: IMAGE_TIME = 2018-09-07T01:04:47.244 MISSION_PHASE_NAME = PERIJOVE 15 PRODUCT_ID = JNCE_2018250_15C00023_V01 SPACECRAFT_ALTITUDE = 6651.4 SPACECRAFT_NAME = JUNO SUB_SPACECRAFT_LATITUDE = 38.1981 SUB_SPACECRAFT_LONGITUDE = 330.5426 TITLE = PJ15 North North Temperate Belt Resolution at nadir: ~4.5 km/pixel In the images above the resolution is highest (~4.5 km/pixel) within the brown barge near the right edge of images where a large part of the barge is visible. |
||||||
|
|||||||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 05:23 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |