IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

46 Pages V  « < 25 26 27 28 29 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The Top of Vera Rubin Ridge Part 2, Site 67-73, sol 1944-2297, 24 Jan 2018-22 Jan 2019
PaulH51
post Jul 16 2018, 09:49 AM
Post #391


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Sol 2112: the first images have arrived after the sample acquisition attempt at Voyageurs. The subdued lighting makes it hard to call either way, I'll have to await a mastcam frame to call it properly....
Attached Image


EDIT: 13 HazCam subframe data products are now down. I can't make an animation, but looking at all 13 frames I'd say that they were not fully successful on this attempt. It appears that they may have got the drill bit into the surface a very short amount, but probably not enough to have got a sample in the sleeve. There was plenty of sand movement, and what looks like several press attempts before they pulled the drill away. There may be more subframe images in the pipeline that tells another story, but from what I have seen they'll need another go, maybe with more hammer?

EDIT 2 : The Sol 2113 Mission Update, confirms the hole was not deep enough to obtain a sample: https://astrogeology.usgs.gov/news/astrogeo...-hard-as-a-rock
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Jul 17 2018, 08:47 AM
Post #392


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Sol 2113 ChemCam RMI of Voyageurs 'mini hole'
Attached Image

EDIT and the R-MastCam (mini hole) and the before image (DRT). We can see damage on the rock, probably caused by the hammer action. That's a tough rock!
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 17 2018, 03:37 PM
Post #393


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The drill hole in context with the DRT brush areas.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jul 17 2018, 06:26 PM
Post #394


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Sol 2112 Drilling Animation.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jul 17 2018, 10:56 PM
Post #395


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



There seems to have been some significant vibration there. Were they trying percussion?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Jul 18 2018, 02:00 AM
Post #396


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (serpens @ Jul 18 2018, 06:56 AM) *
There seems to have been some significant vibration there. Were they trying percussion?


Looks like it, Emily's last blog post discusses the return to using percussion with FED at Duluth, The animation from Jan suggests that they tried it here as well. Link to Emily's last blog http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakda...-2027-2092.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Jul 19 2018, 07:39 AM
Post #397


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



Before & After Micro Images of a LIBS raster during sol 2114 at the shallow drill hole at Voyageurs.

Note the drill cuttings (tailings) were pushed away by the laser zaps. Is it probably just my wishful thinking, but the cuttings appear to bunched together and aligned by size at the rim of the hole. I was reminded of iron filings on a sheet of paper held above the pole of a magnet. Could this be an indication that the hematite-rich minerals at this hot spot are slightly magnetic?

Note also that the grain size appears to be larger than the previous powdered rock cuttings, maybe a result of the hardness of this rock.

In the post-LIBS image we can also see what appear to be a series of lines from the hole center to the rim, probably a result of the percussive action of the drill?

The sample acquisition may have failed, but it looks like they could have learned much from this campaign.
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gerald
post Jul 19 2018, 05:35 PM
Post #398


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2346
Joined: 7-December 12
Member No.: 6780



QUOTE (PaulH51 @ Jul 19 2018, 09:39 AM) *
Is it probably just my wishful thinking, but the cuttings appear to bunched together and aligned by size at the rim of the hole. I was reminded of iron filings on a sheet of paper held above the pole of a magnet. Could this be an indication that the hematite-rich minerals at this hot spot are slightly magnetic?

If there would be a significant overall magnetic field, and the grains would consist partially of magnetite, the particles would probably line up parallel to magnetic field lines. I don't perceive such an effect here. But slightly magnetic particles might clot together in a more random fashion.
Here, I'm inclined to presume, that the pattern the tailings are forming after the LIBS shots are just a result of the wind pressure decreasing with distance from the LIBS hits, maybe combined with the slope of the abraded area, and surface roughness, but without obvious evidence of magentism being involved.

Compositionally, this would suggest absence of magnetite that might have been magnetized by friction. But the color, of course, suggests presence of hematite.
And the hardness of the rock could explain why there is a ridge.
It would be interesting to know, whether the hematite itself is the cause of the hardness, or if it just plays the role of a pigment, and the hardness is caused by another mineral, like e.g. quartz. But APXS should be able to provide constraints, even if the drill powder isn't accessible for CheMin.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulH51
post Jul 19 2018, 05:50 PM
Post #399


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2425
Joined: 30-January 13
From: Penang, Malaysia.
Member No.: 6853



QUOTE (Gerald @ Jul 20 2018, 01:35 AM) *
If there would be a significant overall magnetic field, and the grains would consist partially of magnetite, the particles would probably line up parallel to magnetic field lines. I don't perceive such an effect here. But slightly magnetic particles might clot together in a more random fashion.
Here, I'm inclined to presume, that the pattern the tailings are forming after the LIBS shots are just a result of the wind pressure decreasing with distance from the LIBS hits, maybe combined with the slope of the abraded area, and surface roughness, but without obvious evidence of magentism being involved.

Compositionally, this would suggest absence of magnetite that might have been magnetized by friction. But the color, of course, suggests presence of hematite.
And the hardness of the rock could explain why there is a ridge.
It would be interesting to know, whether the hematite itself is the cause of the hardness, or if it just plays the role of a pigment, and the hardness is caused by another mineral, like e.g. quartz. But APXS should be able to provide constraints, even if the drill powder isn't accessible for CheMin.

Thank you Gerald, I appreciate your insight once again smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Actionman_*
post Jul 20 2018, 01:14 AM
Post #400





Guests






Attached Image


If the static electro force is great enough to generate a magnetic field the color of the drill area would be that of atmospheric dust proportionally.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jul 20 2018, 08:41 AM
Post #401


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



The settling of particles around the rim appears to result from the interaction between forces from the laser pulses and the drill bowl geometry. Where the laser shots were higher up the side of the bowl the particles in the vicinity settled away from the rim. With the exception of the probable magnesium sulfate fragments the particles seem to be fine and clumped. The clumping could be electrostatic, plasma generation at the target would generate an electromagnetic pulse or potentially even Van der Waals forces.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jul 20 2018, 01:14 PM
Post #402


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L view on Sol 2115.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jul 23 2018, 02:27 PM
Post #403


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L view on Sol 2116.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Jul 23 2018, 07:28 PM
Post #404


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2817
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



and the view on Sol 2119.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charborob
post Jul 25 2018, 02:24 AM
Post #405


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1074
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Québec, Canada
Member No.: 3908



The sol 2119 post-drive Lmastcam view:


And a look at the nearby rocks:
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

46 Pages V  « < 25 26 27 28 29 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 10:59 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.