IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

47 Pages V  « < 42 43 44 45 46 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
South from the landing site, sols 72-237, Starting the science traverse
serpens
post Sep 24 2021, 01:20 AM
Post #646


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



2 mm is around the maximum size of volcanic ash particles but the vast majority are much smaller. It is almost certain that there will be some volcanic ash present in Jezero sedimentary rocks but the majority would be in the matrix. To give an example of size the image below is volcanic ash from the Mt St Helens eruption. The width of the view is 4mm.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post Sep 24 2021, 01:29 AM
Post #647


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 684
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (serpens @ Sep 24 2021, 02:20 AM) *
2 mm is around the maximum size of volcanic ash particles but the vast majority are much smaller. It is almost certain that there will be some volcanic ash present in Jezero sedimentary rocks but the majority would be in the matrix. To give an example of size the image below is volcanic ash from the Mt St Helens eruption. The width of the view is 4mm.

How do we guess the size of ash particles on Mars?
I know they calculated that raindrops could be about 1/8th larger on Mars-
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/artic...6005?via%3Dihub
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andreas Plesch
post Sep 24 2021, 02:44 AM
Post #648


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 248
Joined: 25-February 21
From: Waltham, Massachussetts, U.S.A.
Member No.: 8974



Looking up and down core hole #2 on sol 198, from three, cross-faded Watson images:

Attached Image


click to play (wait a bit).


--------------------
--
Andreas Plesch, andreasplesch at gmail dot com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andreas Plesch
post Sep 24 2021, 02:55 AM
Post #649


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 248
Joined: 25-February 21
From: Waltham, Massachussetts, U.S.A.
Member No.: 8974



And an animation of another Watson series of focus down the core hole, of 16 images:

Attached Image


--------------------
--
Andreas Plesch, andreasplesch at gmail dot com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andreas Plesch
post Sep 24 2021, 02:58 AM
Post #650


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 248
Joined: 25-February 21
From: Waltham, Massachussetts, U.S.A.
Member No.: 8974



Core hole #3 so 198 Watson animation 1:

Attached Image


--------------------
--
Andreas Plesch, andreasplesch at gmail dot com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andreas Plesch
post Sep 24 2021, 02:59 AM
Post #651


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 248
Joined: 25-February 21
From: Waltham, Massachussetts, U.S.A.
Member No.: 8974



Core hole #3 Watson animation #2:

Attached Image


--------------------
--
Andreas Plesch, andreasplesch at gmail dot com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Sep 24 2021, 04:05 AM
Post #652


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (HSchirmer @ Sep 24 2021, 01:29 AM) *
How do we guess the size of ash particles on Mars?
I know they calculated that raindrops could be about 1/8th larger on Mars-

How about we just agree the definition of volcanic ash (<2mm) holds. The size distribution in the range will vary, after all it does between volcanoes on Earth but the real question is what would have been the size of particles deposited in Jezero or the watershed as a function of distance from the as yet unidentified source. Unfortunately there are three unknown variables for that calculation; atmospheric density and viscosity as well as the nature of prevailing winds. Larger particles preferentially fall out close to the source and it would be reasonable to assume that ash deposited in our area of interest would be fine.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 24 2021, 11:44 AM
Post #653


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



And it may not be ash emplaced from airfall. It could be ash from a pyroclastics flow, or from fluvial transportation or from from erosion from an ash deposit.
In the animations of the coreholes I see reddish-tan streaks, which imply weathering of minerals under wet conditions, which is consistent with with their description of the findings.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charborob
post Sep 24 2021, 12:42 PM
Post #654


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1074
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Québec, Canada
Member No.: 3908



Sol 211 LMastcam-Z:
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tau
post Sep 24 2021, 01:22 PM
Post #655


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 665
Joined: 9-May 21
From: Germany
Member No.: 9017



1) Stereoscopic grain-size measurement yields a prevailing diameter of 1.2 to 1.8 mm for the visible grains in this sol 206 Mastcam-Z image
2) Multispectral false color image, sol 208 Mastcam-Z left eye filters 0 to 6, principal components
3) Multispectral false color image, sol 208 Mastcam-Z right eye filters 0 to 6, principal components
4) Context image, sol 206 Front Left Hazard Avoidance Camera A

The source of the coarse grains seems to be weathering of rocks like the one in the center of image 1 and at the lower left corner of 2 and 3.
Some of the flake-like rock fragments show a thin layering.

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dburt
post Sep 24 2021, 06:07 PM
Post #656


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 384
Joined: 4-January 07
Member No.: 1555



QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Sep 24 2021, 04:44 AM) *
And it may not be ash emplaced from airfall. It could be ash from a pyroclastics flow, or from fluvial transportation or from from erosion from an ash deposit....

Agree. And just to be complete, it could also consist of impactoclastic particulate matter (flow or fall), from cratering uphill. This might be difficult to distinguish from volcanic material, given that it also would be composed of it.
dburt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 24 2021, 11:05 PM
Post #657


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



And impactoclastic, also (nicer term than base-surge). And remember, weathering, erosion and transportation are so slow compared to terrestrial processes. We have no idea of the age of this surface.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tau
post Sep 25 2021, 08:52 PM
Post #658


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 665
Joined: 9-May 21
From: Germany
Member No.: 9017



Sol 211 SuperCam RMI with Mastcam-Z context and sol 210 Navcam context.
SuperCam image now with improved self-made flatfield correction, based on eight SuperCam images from sol 206, where the zenith of the Martian sky was captured.
Color correction is not possible without further calibration, so the colors of the rock here are somewhat arbitrary.
The blue color in the Navcam image is only set as a marker.

Attached Image
Attached Image
n
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Sep 26 2021, 07:25 AM
Post #659


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



The olivine rich deposit in the watershed is believed to be a result of deep excavation by the Isidis impact. As it overlays some of the megabreccia it may be base surge, impact related melt flows, fallout which could include ash size particles or a combination of these. The deposits in Jezero appear to have been deposited in the crater from early inflow and the delta material overlays the olivine rich deposits. Seitah is olivine rich and potentially has been eroded to the olivine deposit level subsequent to embayment by the mafic floor. If so the latest sample would represent the earlier deposits in a closed system before the formation of the delta.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tau
post Sep 27 2021, 11:22 AM
Post #660


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 665
Joined: 9-May 21
From: Germany
Member No.: 9017



Sol 213 SuperCam RMI with sol 211 Mastcam-Z context and sol 210 Navcam context

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

47 Pages V  « < 42 43 44 45 46 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 04:01 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.