IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

77 Pages V  « < 71 72 73 74 75 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
MSL Curiosity Lands Safely in Gale Crater, Landing and Commissioning Activity Period 1A, sols 0-8
djellison
post Aug 20 2012, 08:20 PM
Post #1081


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13233
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Yeah - at full length it's 7.5 meters from the top of the deck to the skycrane....which puts it about 8.5m above the surface.

BUT - there's probably 3 seconds of 0.75m/sec constant velocity descent of the descent stage after touchdown - so that 7.5 bridle will have wound back in by about 2.25m - so surface would have been 6.25m.

D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MichaelJWP
post Aug 21 2012, 12:12 PM
Post #1082


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 9-August 12
Member No.: 6521



Doug, does the MSL EDL playback in Eyes on the Solar System now match up with the actual data returned?

BTW amazing job on all the visualisations - my 8 year old son was fascinated by the EDL animation but somewhat disturbed by the waste of money represented by the landing stage crashing! Had to explain the whole endeavour costs quite a lot of money and that was just part of it:)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Aug 21 2012, 01:51 PM
Post #1083


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13233
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (MichaelJWP @ Aug 21 2012, 04:12 AM) *
Doug, does the MSL EDL playback in Eyes on the Solar System now match up with the actual data returned?


Nope - not yet - still waiting on the reconstructed trajectory. Another couple of weeks I'm afraid.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
atomoid
post Aug 21 2012, 07:21 PM
Post #1084


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 267
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Member No.: 196



Apologies if i missed a discussion on this, but I hadnt heard much speculation on why there is so much debris on deck, its surprising considering the skycrane plumes extended outward from the rover somehow all this sand and pebbles got kicked up somehow apparently in opposition to prevailing forces. I dont think there were any other potential forces except the wheels hitting the ground, so im puzzled by what exactly hoisted this much stuff up on deck... any facts or thoughts?

..unless its not martian, but terran debris? perhaps pyro device remnants (i woudlnt expect heatshield debris to make it inside the shell as that would probably be serious!)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
john_s
post Aug 21 2012, 07:40 PM
Post #1085


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 508
Joined: 3-December 04
From: Boulder, Colorado, USA
Member No.: 117



If you aim a garden hose at the ground at a steep but oblique angle, you'll get some water splashing back in the direction the jet comes from, even if most of it goes in the opposite direction- I expect something similar happened in this case.

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
imipak
post Aug 21 2012, 07:42 PM
Post #1086


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 642
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



QUOTE (atomoid @ Aug 21 2012, 08:21 PM) *
Apologies if i missed a discussion on this, but I hadnt heard much speculation on why there is so much debris on deck...


Take a look at the touchdown sequences in the movies posted on the MARDI thread...


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Aug 22 2012, 09:10 AM
Post #1087


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2561
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I've got a LOT to learn on Photoshop (and I know it;-)) but anyway, I took a context picture from Astro0 from the Gale crater thread and I tried to put Eduardo's Oppy route on it to show, a mere few hours before Curiosity's first drive, the looooong route she'll have to rove to catch up with his/her fellow rover. wheel.gif

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vikingmars
post Aug 22 2012, 01:25 PM
Post #1088


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 485
Joined: 19-February 05
From: France, close to Paris (& 5mn drive from Meudon Observatory)
Member No.: 172



QUOTE (Ant103 @ Aug 18 2012, 04:04 AM) *
So, it tooks me a little time, but finally get the result I want.

Lots of congrats Ant 103 for this SUPERB work of yours !
And it was so nice and good to have you "on board" during the live MSL landing event close to Paris...
And thanks to the weblinks to your Normandy pictures with their impressive chalk cliffs. Indeed one of the most interesting geological places : as you may know, the bottom of the English Channel with its tear-shaped islands is considered by some English and French geologists as a close replica to typical outflow channels on Mars thanks to the two so-called "North Sea Megafloods" that occured 425,000 and 225,000 years ago respectively... Look at those cliffs, imagine a salmon-pink sky ...and you're on Mars !
Cheers ! wheel.gif wheel.gif wheel.gif wheel.gif wheel.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pac56
post Aug 23 2012, 03:01 AM
Post #1089


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 9
Joined: 9-August 08
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 4309



QUOTE (climber @ Aug 22 2012, 04:10 AM) *
I've got a LOT to learn on Photoshop (and I know it;-)) but anyway, I took a context picture from Astro0 from the Gale crater thread and I tried to put Eduardo's Oppy route on it to show, a mere few hours before Curiosity's first drive, the looooong route she'll have to rove to catch up with his/her fellow rover. wheel.gif

Attached Image


It looks like they want to rove in 2 years what Oppy did in approx. 8 years.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moozoo
post Aug 23 2012, 03:23 AM
Post #1090


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 28-July 11
Member No.: 6088



QUOTE (john_s @ Aug 22 2012, 03:40 AM) *
If you aim a garden hose at the ground at a steep but oblique angle, you'll get some water splashing back in the direction the jet comes from, even if most of it goes in the opposite direction- I expect something similar happened in this case.
John


Does this also mean that the rover had hydrazine exhaust blown all over it?
Does that contaminate any of the instruments?
Maybe with dust that has reacted with the hydrazine exhaust , or is that not possible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Aug 23 2012, 10:07 AM
Post #1091


Forum Contributor
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



The project scientist has said that the jets would be no problem as the decay of hydrazine was well understood. The jets also were angled outwards, but some blow back did occur, more than they expected. The two main labs are sealed inside the rover.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Aug 23 2012, 11:36 AM
Post #1092


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1061
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (MahFL @ Aug 23 2012, 06:07 AM) *
The jets also were angled outwards, but some blow back did occur, more than they expected.


How about as the descent stage angled away--would that tend to blow stuff back toward the rover?

Phil Stooke did an amazing projection showing an aerial view of the landing site--here's a crop:

Attached Image


Seem like you can see the imprint of each of the four plumes, and the pair closest to the rover are further apart, as if the descent stage is tilted? I think that's the direction that it flew off in (left).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Aug 23 2012, 01:12 PM
Post #1093


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3534
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (jmknapp @ Aug 23 2012, 01:36 PM) *
Seem like you can see the imprint of each of the four plumes, and the pair closest to the rover are further apart, as if the descent stage is tilted? I think that's the direction that it flew off in (left).

My guess is that's a reprojection artifact.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Aug 23 2012, 02:34 PM
Post #1094


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13233
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Given how well behaved everything was during edl - I'd agree. Reprojection.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmknapp
post Aug 23 2012, 02:39 PM
Post #1095


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1061
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Columbus OH USA
Member No.: 13



QUOTE (djellison @ Aug 23 2012, 10:34 AM) *
Given how well behaved everything was during edl - I'd agree. Reprojection.


Isn't the descent stage supposed to angle away from the landing site after the bridle cut?

The projection is striking in that the rover tracks are correctly shown as parallel, and the "pirouette" wheel marks circular.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

77 Pages V  « < 71 72 73 74 75 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 06:25 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.