IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

240 Pages V  « < 188 189 190 191 192 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Opportunity Route Map
Tesheiner
post Sep 2 2010, 07:45 AM
Post #2836


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Sol 2348.
Attached Image

Attached File  Route_Map_Sol2348.kml ( 57.88K ) Number of downloads: 443
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Sep 3 2010, 06:41 AM
Post #2837


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



Chit chat posts moved to the drive discussion topic: From Cambridge Bay to the "parking lot"

Let's try to remember to keep this topic for route map updates.


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 3 2010, 07:22 AM
Post #2838


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Sol 2349.
Attached Image

Attached File  Route_Map_Sol2349.kml ( 58.06K ) Number of downloads: 417
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vultur
post Sep 7 2010, 02:50 AM
Post #2839


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 202
Joined: 9-September 08
Member No.: 4334



Is each grid square 100 x 100 meters?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 7 2010, 03:33 AM
Post #2840


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Yup.

Here's today's map update corresponding to sol 2353.
Attached Image

Attached File  Route_Map_Sol2353.kml ( 58.24K ) Number of downloads: 446
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 9 2010, 07:02 AM
Post #2841


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Here's the latest map update, with another km mark just behind: 23km. It's a "draft" version since it still has to be adjusted with the help of the navcam pics.
Sol 2355.

Attached Image

Attached File  Route_Map_Sol2356.kml ( 58.8K ) Number of downloads: 357


Edit: Updated, because it was off by around 4 meters. It's not a big issue on a single move but this error when accumulated drive after drive may be significant.

This post has been edited by Tesheiner: Sep 10 2010, 07:59 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Sep 11 2010, 10:34 AM
Post #2842


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I played around with Google Earth as well as Eduardo map from post #2833 and try to find when and where we'll cross the 13kms in strait line from Eagle. You'll find here what I've got.

Attached Image


Anyway there's a problem. Using Google rule, it's easy to calculate distance and as you'll see here, the "probable" 13 km from Eagle circle is close from 2 remarkable lines on Eduardo's grid: the vertical 2 km East and the horizontal 13 km South. Unless Maths are different on Mars, Pythagoras is not going to be happy with that! So, either Google rule is corupted, or Eduardo's grid is wrong or, more probably, I AM wrong. Anyway, I thought I'd better post this either for Eduardo to double check is grid or to know from you if we can trust Google rule. Thanks

Note: the probable circle has been set by assuming the route will continue at the same heading (which is close to the "blue" projected official route) as the one from Cambridge to sol 2356 and not shown here since we were not there yet on post #2833 . Note that the distance from Cambridge to this point is (says Google rule) 1 km (1003m to be precise).


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 11 2010, 12:07 PM
Post #2843


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



What I can say about the grid is that it is based on the fact (?) that the background picture has a resolution of 1m/pix. That picture was taken by HiRISE and is labelled PSP_009141_1780. Note that the original picture taken by the camera has a different resolution (26.9cm/pix), but the "map projected" one has 25cm/pix and my route map uses the latter one at 1/4th size.

An "error" in the map projection process? I don't think so. Perhaps it is related to the fact that the images used on GE have a significant "emission angle" so they are slightly distorted.

Perhaps Phil Stooke or Tim Parker could provide some light to this topic.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Sep 11 2010, 12:33 PM
Post #2844


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



Climber--how great is the discrepancy? Putting a flat grid on a sphere leads to small discrepancies on a small scale and major discrepancies on global scales.
You are correct Tesheiner---"Perhaps Phil Stooke or Tim Parker could provide some light to this topic".


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Sep 11 2010, 12:54 PM
Post #2845


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (Floyd @ Sep 11 2010, 02:33 PM) *
Climber--how great is the discrepancy?

I'd say Pythagorias is easily your friend in this case rolleyes.gif
Hypothenuse² = horizontal² + vertical² = 169+4=√173
13153m instead of 13000m


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 11 2010, 04:17 PM
Post #2846


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10153
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Don't forget that the map-projected images take into account only an idealized smooth surface - these are not orthophotos corrected for relief distortion. Meridiani Planum is smooth but not perfectly flat, and a discrepancy of a few hundred meters after 13000 m is probably quite reasonable. If you only look at one map-projected image it's easy to think it must have perfect geometry, but try overlaying one image on top of another and you'll find discrepancies at this level.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Sep 11 2010, 09:41 PM
Post #2847


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I should have said Philthagoras is your friend...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 12 2010, 08:36 AM
Post #2848


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Sol 2358.
Attached Image

Attached File  Route_Map_Sol2358.kml ( 59.02K ) Number of downloads: 438
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 17 2010, 03:29 PM
Post #2849


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Here's a (late) update related to sol 2361. I was off the town with no way to "work" on due time.
Attached Image

Attached File  Route_Map_Sol2361.kml ( 59.2K ) Number of downloads: 419
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 18 2010, 09:17 AM
Post #2850


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Sol 2363.
Attached Image

Attached File  Route_Map_Sol2363.kml ( 59.57K ) Number of downloads: 426
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

240 Pages V  « < 188 189 190 191 192 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 10:31 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.