PLATO, PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars |
PLATO, PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars |
Dec 7 2011, 07:16 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Florida & Texas, USA Member No.: 482 |
I saw this brief ESA blurb about a potential successor to the Kepler mission:
http://www.esa.int/esaSC/SEMSHM7CS5G_index_0.html It is under review along with Euclid and the Solar orbiter, but only 2 of these 3 missions will have funding to move forward. According the the website: "The final decision about which missions to implement will be taken after the definition activities are completed, which is foreseen to be in mid-2011." I found news on ESA's website that makes it appear that PLATO did not make the cut. http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=49385 ://http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/ob...objectid=49385 This is surprising to me considering that TESS was not selected by NASA, so it appears there are no follow up telescopes planet to expand upon Kepler's success, which is restricted to such a small survey site. I wonder if there might be another way to fund PLATO? The only other information I've gleaned so far is this website: http://www.lesia.obspm.fr/perso/claude-catala/plato_web.html Are these missions getting bumped in part due to the need to have JWST perform follow up studies? It'd be nice to see space telescopes getting fast-tracked instead of sidelined, and something else needs to replace Kepler in another 8 years. |
|
|
Dec 7 2011, 07:51 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Director of Galilean Photography Group: Members Posts: 896 Joined: 15-July 04 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 93 |
Well, Kepler to me was more of a "reach into a bag of marbles and get some statistics on what's there" kind of mission. It won't tell us which exact nearby stars to look at, but rather which type of star is more likely to have Venus to Marsish planets. A followup JWST or other mission to examine all nearby star systems would be more valuable than another "reach" into the bag. There might be some science to do on a mission looking a different direction, to get a feel for how statistics vary depending upon metallicity of the star or spiral arms vs core vs halo, but the majority of the science would have already been done by Kepler.
Now, if nearby surveys *don't* find anything interesting, then a follow-on survey of more stars is warranted. -------------------- Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
-- "The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality. |
|
|
Feb 20 2014, 02:39 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 127 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 291 |
PLATO has been selected for 2024 launch by ESA as its 3rd medium class mission:
http://thespacereporter.com/2014/02/esa-pl...a-second-earth/ QUOTE PLATO will blast off aboard a Soyuz rocket and commence a six-year mission, operating at L2, a point in space 1.5 million kilometers farther from the Sun than Earth. ESA’s Gaia mission will assist PLATO, with both spacecraft working in tandem with future ground- and space-based telescopes. PLATO will use its 34 telescopes and cameras to monitor up to a million stars over half the sky, searching for the transits of exoplanets in front of their host stars. As a planet passes in front of, or ‘transits’, its host star, there are minuscule but regular decreases in the star’s brightness. In conjunction with ground-based measurements of an exoplanet’s radial velocity, PLATO’s data will allow calculation of the planet’s mass and radius. These results will in turn allow the planet’s density to be ascertained, revealing something about its composition. PLATO’s main goal in its survey of thousands of other solar systems is to identify Earth-sized exoplanets and super-Earths inside the habitable zones of their parent stars. PLATO will also study the seismic activity of other stars, facilitating fuller understanding of the host suns of each exoplanet, including the stars’ masses, radii, and ages. Data on Sun-Earth analogue star systems will help us understand the evolution and arrangement of our solar system and how it compares to other star systems. |
|
|
Feb 20 2014, 04:26 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 934 Joined: 4-September 06 From: Boston Member No.: 1102 |
Link to the ESA announcement. Link
-------------------- |
|
|
Feb 13 2024, 07:48 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 255 Joined: 28-October 12 Member No.: 6732 |
PLATO Optical Bench (OB) and Service Module (SVM) flight model (FM) mechanical structures were delivered for further integration work to Oberpfaffenhofen near Munich and Cannes, respectively.
|
|
|
Apr 3 2024, 03:50 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 251 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 |
This is not very timely, but this analysis of the PLATO mission estimates a yield of very roughly 15 candidate earthlike planets.
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html...aa41640-21.html What makes this a bit more interesting than when it was first published is that the characterization of candidate earthlike planets that transit M dwarf hosts has proven more difficult than hoped. The JWST itself has proven more capable than expected in a technical sense, but the universe is not cooperating very nicely: Even the dimmest red dwarfs seem to be noisier than expected, and the planets checked have so far have shown little in the way of [measurable] atmospheres. So, with that path of inquiry proving harder, there's a comparative increase in what we might hope for from candidate earthlike planets that orbit FGK dwarfs like the Sun. Those will be tough to characterize, too. Trying to observe transits of planets that take about a year to orbit their star will mean few opportunities for reasons that we can't control. If the telescopes doing such observation happen to be experiencing local daytime when the transits occur, that further reduces the opportunities, and with the ELT and GMT expected to be at the same longitude, we may have no backup options. Nonetheless, it's nice to know that PLATO will at least identify some of the best candidates for characterization, however long it may take for that work to succeed. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 03:19 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |