What's your 3D preference?, Curious about how UMSF readers prefer to see 3D content |
What's your 3D preference?, Curious about how UMSF readers prefer to see 3D content |
Sep 4 2012, 03:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Hi folks, markril's comment in the recent MSL thread made me wonder what 3D formats really are preferred by UMSF members. Although we are more likely than average to own a pair of red-blue glasses, that doesn't mean that red-blue anaglyphs should necessarily be the go-to choice. What format(s) do you prefer for 3D content?
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 05:06 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
X-Eye/Parallel doesn't usually work for me, and when it does I get awful headaches. MPO requires downloading the file and then loading it in a viewing app. Anaglyph all the way.
|
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 06:17 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2082 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Cross-eyed and stereo are just irritating to get the effect, and I don't own any red/blue glasses. Flicker gifs are the really convenient method but I've only seen them a handful of times in many years on UMSF, so I'm not surprised they aren't up for vote.
There's some way to make them oneself, right? |
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 07:38 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 312 |
Flicker - GIF for Colour, Red Blue Anyglif for B&W
|
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 07:46 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 14-January 06 Member No.: 645 |
...Flicker gifs are the really convenient method... FWIW, I second the flicker gifs. I find them particularly useful for short subject posts . They are very effective when you just want to make a point and move on. For small images which can be studied without panning, I like cross-eyed or parallel stereograms. While I admit that they are an acquired taste, if they came with "training wheel" dots I think more people would enjoy them. Nowadays, I often find myself with a laptop or other mobile device in a setting where pulling out red-blue glasses draws unwanted attention, but for panoramas or images that require deep thought, I still prefer the anaglyphs. I was really surprised that flicker gifs didn't appear among the survey choices. Perhaps they could be added to the list. |
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 09:23 AM
Post
#6
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Although the "Flicker" 3D pics are useful, I'm definitely a die-hard anaglyph user and maker. Cross-eyed viewing makes me want to be sick. No, anaglyphs are clearer, sharper, better depth of field; you're really "in" the picture.
Personally, I find them fantastic for Outreach - give out a load of glasses to a group, put an anaglyph of martian rocks on the screen, and wait for the communal "Wow!!!" BTW: re glasses: there's really no excuse for anyone not to have a pair of red/blue glasses handy now, they're easy to get hold of. People in the UK (most countries, I'm sure) can just go down to their local discount bookstore, where I can almost *guarantee* that they'll find at least one book in the children's section -usually about "creepy crawlies" or "dinosaurs" - with 3D content and a free pair of glasses. ( And if you go to a newsagent's there'll be at least one kids magazine with the same.) And, as Doug has pointed out many times, US members can simply write to their nearerst NASA centre and they'll probably be sent some glasses for free. -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 10:04 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 60 Joined: 1-August 06 From: Vienna, Austria Member No.: 1002 |
X-eye doesn't work for me at all - maybe it's my +60yrs old eyes, maybe it the reading glasses! Anaglyphs are great for B&W (I use red/blue clip-ons); flicker.gifs best for colour or if I want to share with others.
|
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 10:57 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 813 Joined: 29-December 05 From: NE Oh, USA Member No.: 627 |
Anaglyphs please.
I have pairs of red-blue glasses at home, at work, and now that I have a smartphone, in my car. (I do not view while driving) Craig |
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 11:29 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Lord Of The Uranian Rings Group: Members Posts: 798 Joined: 18-July 05 From: Plymouth, UK Member No.: 437 |
I'm going to buck the trend by placing a vigorous vote for CROSS-EYE.
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 11:59 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1074 Joined: 21-September 07 From: Québec, Canada Member No.: 3908 |
Count me in also for cross-eye, but I also like anaglyphs.
|
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 01:14 PM
Post
#11
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2250 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
I voted for anaglyphs and cross-eye stereo for color and grayscale since both of these work for me but I strongly prefer anaglyphs, expecially for big images.
I don't like flicker GIFs - I see no 'depth' in these as in anaglyphs although the 'movement' reveals some of the depth/distance. And a major problem with GIFs is that they are limited to 256 colors. |
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 01:25 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 219 Joined: 14-November 11 From: Washington, DC Member No.: 6237 |
I would strongly encourage more cross-eyed stereo pairs to be posted, especially where color is available. The major advantage is that they can be viewed on any device and they retain color. They do appear smaller than the actual size though, so it's harder to see fine detail, and don't work as well when panning of the image is needed or anything else where mouse interaction is needed because it breaks my focus. Compared to cross-eyed I have a lot of trouble with parallel images; don't know if that's just me or they're more difficult in general.
That said, I finally stuck a pair of cheap red-blue glasses in my drawer at the office, and now I see why folks like anagyphs! The advantage for me is that they images appear full scale. However, I've only seen a few color ones that work so the anaglyphs in my opinion are really best for grayscale. Also minor variations in the colors used vs the glasses lens colors can really make it difficult to see sometimes. |
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 01:27 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 656 Joined: 20-April 05 From: League City, Texas Member No.: 285 |
I strongly prefer cross-eyed, and since I've been doing it for upwards of 30 years I find it nearly effortless. I don't have a a pair of the colored glasses for anaglyphs, so I always save them and open as cross-eyed with stereo-photo-maker. I understand that something like 20% of people are unable to work with cross-eyed image pairs, so when I post them I assume that those who can't are either going to ignore them or do what I do with anaglyphs. I think posting either format is going to mildly inconvenience some subset of the population, so I don't see any point in getting worked-up about it either way.
|
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 01:40 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Even though I have my pair of red-blue glasses sitting within inches of my monitor, I actually prefer the cross-eyed technique, especially for color images. Flicker-gifs are good for scenes with relatively shallow overall depth of field, like a close-up of a rock on the ground, but not so good in my experience for deep images, like those that run from foreground to horizon.
I'm thinking people have enough differing tastes in how they like to view 3D images that, at least with current technology, we ought not be looking for one best technique, but instead ought to try to use a variety of techniques so as to give everyone a shot at being able to view these images using their own favorite technique. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Sep 4 2012, 02:34 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1281 Joined: 18-December 04 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 124 |
I'll just add another vote for flicker gifs, especially for smaller features and close ups. But anaglyphs are the easiest on my eyes, I get headaches with anything cross eyed.
Plus putting on the glasses are like a ritual - gettin' serious time! -------------------- Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th April 2024 - 06:18 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |