IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

The First Europa Lander, What can be done first, cheapest & best?
nprev
post Dec 31 2005, 12:08 AM
Post #1


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I think that many people in this forum would agree that somebody's going to have to land on Europa someday before the rather elaborate schemes to penetrate the outer ice layer will ever fly, if for no other reason than to get some relevant ground truth before committing to such an elaborate, expensive, and risky mission.

EO seems to have ruled out any surface science package for that mission (though it would be nice to change their minds! wink.gif ), but I think that there is a valid requirement at some point to directly assess the surface properties of Europa in an inexpensive yet creative way. Some candidate instrument payloads might be:

1. A sonar transducer/receiver set embedded within a penetrometer to determine crust density and examine the uniformity of the ice layer within the operational radius of the instrument (looking for cracks and holes, in other words).

2. A conductivity sensor again embedded inside a penetrometer to measure the native salinity of the surrounding material and possibly derive some constraints on the composition of metallic salts in the European crust (saltiness has a major effect on ice properties, in addition to the obvious need to derive the salt content of any underlying ocean).

3. A seismometer for all sorts of reasons.


How does this sound? Any critiques, additions, or subtractions? I omitted a surface imager not only because of bandwidth/extra complexity considerations but also because it seems desirable to penetrate the crust in order to minimize as much as possible reading any contaminants from Io during surface measurements. The orbiter data could be used to sense and subtract this from the penetrometer readings.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
dvandorn
post Dec 4 2007, 07:54 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



I would say that not only is it imperative that a melt-hole reseal itself, it's really unavoidable. The extreme cold of the ice surrounding the melt-hole will refreeze any liquid water very quickly, for the first 80% of the hole at least, so if you don't keep re-heating the walls of the hole, it'll freeze solid again within hours of the passage of the ocean probe.

I'm tempted to think that the first 20 or 30 meters of the hole might have to be drilled "dry", the probe dropped in, and the whole thing filled in with the excavated shavings. You then very *slowly* melt out enough liquid water around the probe to *seep* up through the shavings, consolidating them and establishing a pressure-tight seal.

You think that's going to be an engineering feat? That's not even the biggest challenge -- the biggest problem is how to maintain communications through the ice crust between the probe as it descends (and of course after it reaches the ocean) and the lander on the surface, which is of course the comm link between the probe and the outside Universe.

You can't just lower the thing on a cable -- the cable would probably have to be a few km long at the shortest, which would be pretty massive on a spacecraft which will likely have an extremely tight mass budget. Not to mention avoiding snag and jam issues on whatever payout device you design, and the fact that 99% of your cable would be frozen into the resealed hole for most of the descent. You'd have to keep the cable heated for its entire length for it to move through the ice as it pays out, and that wouldn't let you truly seal the melt-hole and avoid that nasty geyser that will otherwise spray your entire mission into a Europan sub-orbital trajectory.

The best design I've seen (and it's likely been discussed here) was one in which the descending probe would leave relays every few tens of meters, each relay capable of talking with the two above it and the two below it. (It's easier to transmit across 30 meters of ice than it is to transmit across a few km... and you want to be able to lose one or two and, as long as they're not next to one another, you still maintain your overall link to the surface.)

The bigger issue, of course, is that any such ocean probe is going to have to literally sink the entire way through the ice crust. That means that the probe is going to have to create a bubble of superheated (for its environment) liquid water that will unfailingly *sink* through the entire crust. Given the likelihood (almost certainty) that the ice is likely not homogenous but will have impurities (such as, oh, I dunno, maybe house-sized rocky boulders), this is going to be very, very difficult to pull off. The whole descent process is going to be extremely energy-intensive, and the probe will have to take that energy down with it -- no cables, remember? And each comm relay is going to have hefty power requirements, too. (And, of course, in such an eternally dark ocean, we'll need to bring some awfully bright lights all the way down into it, just to see what's there...)

The odds are that this isn't going to work the first time we try it. It may not work the first several times we try it. It may be almost impossibly difficult to do.

Whatever the odds, though -- we simply must try.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Dec 4 2007, 03:02 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2530
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Dec 3 2007, 11:54 PM) *
The bigger issue, of course, is that any such ocean probe is going to have to literally sink the entire way through the ice crust.


I hadn't thought about this angle before, but of course if it's much denser than water, it's going to descend very rapidly (and without much controlled mobility) once it hits water. If it's not, then then it's not going to be a lot of force driving the descent through the ice. Unless the heated front end is jettisoned (or, I should say, flotsomed) at that point. Another failure point.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- nprev   The First Europa Lander   Dec 31 2005, 12:08 AM
- - Steve G   QUOTE (nprev @ Dec 30 2005, 05:08 PM)I think ...   Dec 31 2005, 02:40 AM
- - BruceMoomaw   JPL's study of useful instruments for a small ...   Dec 31 2005, 03:33 AM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 30 2005, 07:33 PM)St...   Dec 31 2005, 04:38 AM
|- - tty   QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Dec 31 2005, 05:33 AM)Th...   Jan 1 2006, 11:04 PM
- - edstrick   as Bruce points out.. hit the surface slightly off...   Dec 31 2005, 12:17 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   There are *natural* penetrators as well as man-mad...   Dec 31 2005, 12:40 PM
- - gpurcell   I think it is going to be pretty difficult to argu...   Jan 1 2006, 05:01 PM
|- - nprev   Re the penetrometer descent alignment problem: Wou...   Jan 1 2006, 09:11 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (gpurcell @ Jan 1 2006, 12:01 PM)I thin...   Jan 5 2006, 05:06 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   Uh-uh. An object that short would take weeks -- a...   Jan 1 2006, 09:42 PM
|- - nprev   Hmm. How about a "semi-hard" lander al a...   Jan 1 2006, 10:22 PM
- - ermar   QUOTE Europa has an atmosphere though it is extrem...   Jan 1 2006, 11:52 PM
- - tasp   Perhaps a future mission would drop an impactor at...   Jan 2 2006, 03:42 AM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (tasp @ Jan 1 2006, 10:42 PM)Perhaps a ...   Jan 3 2006, 03:49 PM
- - tty   It's too bad there is no GPS system on Europa....   Jan 3 2006, 06:19 PM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (tty @ Jan 3 2006, 11:19 AM)It's to...   Jan 3 2006, 08:40 PM
- - nprev   AlexBlackwell posted the fact that the 2006 Discov...   Jan 3 2006, 11:59 PM
- - ljk4-1   Tell me this wouldn't be useful for an Europan...   Mar 29 2006, 07:47 PM
- - ljk4-1   Karl Hibbitts describes a proposed hyper-velocity ...   May 1 2006, 06:55 PM
- - PhilHorzempa   It seems that at the November 2005 COMPLEX meeting...   Jun 27 2006, 04:07 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   Why to limit the life time of a surface lander? if...   Jun 27 2006, 07:16 AM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jun 27 2006, 12...   Jun 27 2006, 07:04 PM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (JRehling @ Jun 27 2006, 12:04 PM) ...   Jun 28 2006, 01:30 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (nprev @ Jun 28 2006, 01:30 AM) ......   Jun 28 2006, 07:42 AM
- - RNeuhaus   A panoramic camera plus an astronamic telescope to...   Jun 28 2006, 10:49 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jun 28 2006, 03:49 PM) ...   Jun 29 2006, 12:31 AM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jun 28 2006, 11:49 PM) ...   Jun 29 2006, 07:23 AM
- - algorimancer   Considering the deliverable mass potential, and ou...   Jun 29 2006, 12:49 PM
- - djellison   I'm sure everyone would love a massive long li...   Jun 29 2006, 01:00 PM
|- - Stephen   QUOTE (djellison @ Jun 29 2006, 01:00 PM)...   Jul 3 2006, 11:20 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (Stephen @ Jul 3 2006, 11:20 AM) Wo...   Jul 3 2006, 11:44 AM
- - Myran   Yes I agree with djellison and others. To give the...   Jun 29 2006, 03:36 PM
|- - JRehling   I don't think we can bet that a Europa rover w...   Jun 29 2006, 05:51 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (Myran @ Jun 29 2006, 08:36 AM) The...   Jun 29 2006, 05:55 PM
- - RNeuhaus   Now I understand that it is very expensive to send...   Jun 29 2006, 08:14 PM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jun 29 2006, 09:14 PM) ...   Jun 29 2006, 09:07 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jun 29 2006, 01:14 PM) ...   Jun 30 2006, 05:52 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (JRehling @ Jun 30 2006, 06:52 PM) ...   Jun 30 2006, 07:26 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jun 30 2006, 02:26 PM) ...   Jul 1 2006, 02:45 AM
- - nprev   Harkening back to the origin of this thread, I com...   Jun 30 2006, 12:50 PM
- - algorimancer   My rationale behind sending a rover initially is t...   Jun 30 2006, 01:13 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (algorimancer @ Jun 30 2006, 02:13 ...   Jun 30 2006, 01:50 PM
- - djellison   Perhaps the cunning technique that would have been...   Jun 30 2006, 07:35 PM
|- - DDAVIS   QUOTE (djellison @ Jun 30 2006, 07:35 PM)...   Jul 1 2006, 01:16 AM
- - Richard Trigaux   There are three ways to protect electronics from r...   Jul 1 2006, 06:01 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jul 1 2006, 07:0...   Jul 1 2006, 01:55 PM
|- - mchan   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jun 30 2006, 11...   Jul 3 2006, 12:20 AM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (mchan @ Jul 3 2006, 12:20 AM) Besi...   Jul 3 2006, 09:52 AM
- - edstrick   In the outer solar system, we have tended to find ...   Jul 1 2006, 08:50 AM
- - Myran   Just offhand and without checking I dont think any...   Jul 1 2006, 02:26 PM
- - djellison   Pushbroom? Doug   Jul 3 2006, 07:36 AM
- - nprev   Richard, that sounds good for a long-lived stand-a...   Jul 4 2006, 01:09 AM
- - Roly   March 26 2006 Powerpoint on various Europa Lander ...   Sep 3 2006, 07:07 AM
|- - angel1801   Has anyone thought of putting an Europa Lander at ...   Sep 3 2006, 04:27 PM
|- - ugordan   I would think the landing site will be determined ...   Sep 3 2006, 06:37 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (angel1801 @ Sep 3 2006, 09:27 AM) ...   Sep 4 2006, 05:15 PM
- - Roly   Any chance that the launch vehicle for the Europa ...   Sep 4 2006, 03:01 AM
- - edstrick   The radiation is not FROM Jupiter. The radiation ...   Sep 4 2006, 11:07 AM
- - Julius   Being modest,I'd still say that 3 days lifetim...   Sep 5 2006, 08:03 PM
- - nprev   I still think a hard-lander, a penetrometer, or so...   Sep 6 2006, 01:43 AM
- - algorimancer   Something like the MER's autonomous navigation...   Sep 6 2006, 12:55 PM
|- - ugordan   Still, the biggest problem is soft landing via pow...   Sep 6 2006, 01:27 PM
- - algorimancer   I just had one of those Aha! moments and came ...   Sep 9 2006, 09:24 PM
- - Myran   Thats a wild idea algorimancer. But regardless ho...   Sep 10 2006, 07:42 AM
|- - algorimancer   QUOTE (Myran @ Sep 10 2006, 02:42 AM) Tha...   Sep 10 2006, 01:05 PM
- - nprev   Hmm. Given that the Galileo data was a bit limited...   Sep 10 2006, 09:00 PM
- - Drkskywxlt   I think any such impact with the surface of Europa...   Sep 11 2006, 01:32 PM
|- - AndyG   The (admittedly ill-fated) penetrators of Deep Spa...   Sep 11 2006, 03:34 PM
- - remcook   Most importantly IMO is the whole uncertainty of t...   Sep 11 2006, 04:12 PM
|- - algorimancer   QUOTE (remcook @ Sep 11 2006, 11:12 AM) ....   Sep 11 2006, 05:47 PM
- - Julius   Main objective should be to get a Europa lander sa...   Sep 12 2006, 07:37 PM
- - rasun   Hi! Apparently, NASA's Astrobiology, Scie...   Nov 29 2007, 05:35 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (rasun @ Nov 29 2007, 09:35 AM) So ...   Nov 29 2007, 08:36 PM
|- - DDAVIS   This discussion is of particular interest to me as...   Dec 3 2007, 11:17 AM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (DDAVIS @ Dec 3 2007, 03:17 AM) Thi...   Dec 3 2007, 07:05 PM
- - nprev   Wow. Don, only thing I can think of is that th...   Dec 3 2007, 12:46 PM
- - dvandorn   I would say that not only is it imperative that a ...   Dec 4 2007, 07:54 AM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (dvandorn @ Dec 3 2007, 11:54 PM) T...   Dec 4 2007, 03:02 PM
|- - hendric   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 4 2007, 09:02 AM) U...   Dec 4 2007, 04:55 PM
- - nprev   Nihilistic, but IMHO painstakingly plausible, oDou...   Dec 4 2007, 12:19 PM
- - Cugel   Why would you go all the way down to the liquid wa...   Dec 4 2007, 01:06 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (Cugel @ Dec 4 2007, 05:06 AM) Why ...   Dec 4 2007, 03:06 PM
|- - centsworth_II   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 4 2007, 10:06 AM) I...   Dec 4 2007, 03:55 PM
||- - marsbug   I dont know about squid but there are many studies...   Dec 4 2007, 04:35 PM
|- - Cugel   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 4 2007, 04:06 PM) I...   Dec 4 2007, 07:30 PM
||- - nprev   QUOTE (Cugel @ Dec 4 2007, 11:30 AM) At l...   Dec 5 2007, 01:45 AM
|- - tty   QUOTE (JRehling @ Dec 4 2007, 04:06 PM) I...   Dec 4 2007, 07:42 PM
- - centsworth_II   I think it's safe to say that the first Europa...   Dec 4 2007, 05:58 PM
- - dvandorn   I don't think I'd be good with just openin...   Dec 4 2007, 07:12 PM
- - charborob   A probe melting its way all through Europa's i...   Dec 4 2007, 08:03 PM
- - dvandorn   My thoughts exactly -- it's going to be a very...   Dec 4 2007, 08:58 PM
- - hendric   Well, RTGs actually put out quite a bit of heat, a...   Dec 5 2007, 01:41 AM
- - DDAVIS   Wow, this discussion is great! I am imaginin...   Dec 5 2007, 07:10 PM
- - tty   Let's do some order-of-magnitude calculations ...   Dec 5 2007, 07:23 PM
|- - hendric   QUOTE (tty @ Dec 5 2007, 01:23 PM) Let...   Dec 6 2007, 05:47 PM
- - mchan   QUOTE (dvandorn @ Dec 4 2007, 11:12 AM) A...   Dec 6 2007, 04:20 AM
- - nprev   Gotta say that I'm pretty sold on the pristin...   Dec 6 2007, 07:14 AM
- - edstrick   Both from a science and an engineering perspective...   Dec 6 2007, 09:39 AM
- - centsworth_II   At the least, a first Europa mission should map th...   Dec 6 2007, 05:02 PM
2 Pages V   1 2 >


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th March 2024 - 07:04 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.