IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Processing VIMS cubes, An attempt at "true" color
tedstryk
post Sep 22 2006, 09:12 PM
Post #61


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



For Jupiter and Saturn, I am biased toward the right hand images based on experiences with a telescope, but this brings in a whole new host of visual issues...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Sep 25 2006, 08:02 PM
Post #62


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



I've been experimenting with cleaning up the VIMS visual channel a bit. I've found a cube that captures the night side of Titan with the entire 64x64 hires field of view that served as an augmented dark background to remove the pesky noise. It turned out better than I hoped. Unfortunately, the noise doesn't seem to be as static as I thought. Most of the noise is removed, but some isn't.

To illustrate just what mess the VIMS cubes are (including their calibration data), here are a couple of before and after images:



The bottom image is one of the highest resolution views of Iapetus by VIMS. The noise is disastrous. You can actually see it's mostly coincident with the ring image above.
My dark current removal model assumes noise is linear with exposure, this seems to work well. The background will need some touching up still.

I emailed one of the guys responsible for the PDS volumes, he said he'll look into it and get back to me. We shall see, though I'm not getting my hopes up.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Sep 26 2006, 07:33 AM
Post #63


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Sure enough, I got a response from the VIMS team. They had this to say:

QUOTE
New dark models have not been generated with regularity and users of the VIS science data have been doing corrections after the calibration pipeline by looking at average values along columns in data and using these values to correct their data.

That doesn't sound like a very exact science, though.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post Sep 26 2006, 09:49 AM
Post #64


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



It probably boils down to too-much-to-do, not-enough-techies, not-enough-grad-students...

The sort of thing that pennypinching does to a live mission. They'll have time for a systematic beginning-to-end calibration effort when the mission is over.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Sep 26 2006, 02:27 PM
Post #65


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



To reiterate what you said, on my asking if updated calibration data will be provided, he said that will happen at the end of Cassini mission. An earlier update may be possible, but not likely.

Guess that means I'm stuck with homebrewn dark current models <sigh>...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Oct 4 2006, 05:55 PM
Post #66


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Here are a few quick results from the new PDS release. Not that much interesting stuff in there this time. These don't have the sRGB correct gamma of 2.2 because it just looks too washed out to me and it really brings the nasty vertical noise out. I chose a gamma of 1.33 instead. Magnified 2x.

The first image is coincident with an ISS wide-angle shot. The 3rd image from the left shows the F ring, the 4th shows Titan's north pole at high phase. The Saturn mosaic has one of the moons visible at the bottom - might be Dione/Tethys/Rhea, I haven't checked. The last image was taken during that Titan flyby where we had Saturn emerging from behind Titan's limb. You can barely see part of Saturn's crescent there, too bad the view didn't capture more of it.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Indian3000
post Oct 11 2006, 11:53 AM
Post #67


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 239
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Bruxelles, Belgium
Member No.: 278



First test to process VIMS cube ( gamma 2.2 )


v1509053994_1

color
Attached Image


thumbnails
Attached Image




v1509133941_1

color
Attached Image


thumbnails
Attached Image


v1509134411_1

color

Attached Image


thumbnails
Attached Image


and a small screenshot of my software ( perharp a release un some days .. or weeks smile.gif )

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Feb 18 2011, 10:20 PM
Post #68


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Hey folks, the Rings Node has generated preview images for Cassini VIMS cubes to their OPUS search tool. The attached screen cap shows what these look like for a colorful object, Iapetus. Here's an explanation by Mark Showalter of what the preview images show. This will make it much easier to browse for good VIMS data!
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Apr 28 2011, 09:27 PM
Post #69


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



A superb piece of work at TPS but we have to have it here too.

http://www.planetary.org/image/2383059379_c56b0272cb_o.png

Believable true colour is a great gift. Thank you Gordan.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  « < 3 4 5
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 11:34 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.