IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

12 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Getting to 'Big Crater', A little premature speculation
Ant103
post Sep 21 2006, 04:45 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1619
Joined: 12-February 06
From: Bergerac - FR
Member No.: 678



This thread remember me an other thread I made a time ago rolleyes.gif
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=2327


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Sep 21 2006, 04:45 PM
Post #17


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (climber @ Sep 21 2006, 05:40 PM) *
So, "UMSF" will be OK : it's a city under 100,000


laugh.gif
aka the proud and glorious Geeksville!
laugh.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Sep 21 2006, 05:51 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (tim53 @ Sep 21 2006, 08:34 AM) *
the IAU convention for naming craters on Mars would be named after a city on Earth with a population under 100,000.

Well "Elk Grove" is out as of about 2 years ago. I once lived in Bozeman, MT though. That has a nice ring to it. I'll start my naming campaign as soon as we are finished with Victoria. wink.gif


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
imipak
post Sep 21 2006, 08:12 PM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 646
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



Mad, mad, mad... you're all completely mad. I love it! biggrin.gif

Looking at the large-scale image I thought: those knife-sharp rim hills would look sensational from the north with a low light angle, at dawn or sunset. Hmmm... I wonder how wide that ridgeline really is?

Now... imagine - if you dare - the view from the top of Priam...


ohmy.gif


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tim53
post Sep 21 2006, 08:47 PM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 8-August 06
Member No.: 1022



QUOTE (ustrax @ Sep 21 2006, 09:39 AM) *
biggrin.gif
So...Victoria shouldn't bear a city's name?



It doesn't.


...you guys know that, don't you? wink.gif

-Tim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeff7
post Sep 21 2006, 09:30 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 2-March 05
Member No.: 180



QUOTE (ustrax @ Sep 21 2006, 08:40 AM) *
And I was hesitating on starting talking about this... rolleyes.gif

Beyond!:

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustr...ondvictoria.jpg

biggrin.gif

EDITED: And for what I'm seing that 'Big Crater' doesn't have a name...yet... tongue.gif


Time to start a poll for the arrival at Big Crater. Let's see, I'll give maybe 400 sols to Victoria if we hurry. So that'll be somewhere around Sol 1350 for departure. It took almost 900 Sols to explore Endurance and then get to Victoria, minus some time at Purgatory. Assuming 1 stopoff at MiniEndurance, and only 100 Sols there.....let me see here.

Leave Sol 1350. Drive days, lots of drive days. No science. 400 days to get to MiniEndurance, Sol 1750. 100 Sols of exploration. 1850. Another 400 to get to Big Crater. 2250.
Add in times for getting stuck, and more time for science stops that really should be made. Maybe push Sol 2500. Plus possible wheel problems similar to Spirit's, Sol 3000.

While I'd love to see it happen, I think that that's pushing it a little. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slinted
post Sep 21 2006, 09:35 PM
Post #22


Member
***

Group: Admin
Posts: 468
Joined: 11-February 04
From: USA
Member No.: 21



QUOTE (SFJCody @ Sep 21 2006, 06:19 AM) *
It's based on a THEMIS mosaic I found on the forums, can't remember who made it but thanks whoever you are!

You're welcome smile.gif
Here's the original mosaic, if anyone else wants to play with it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Sep 21 2006, 09:49 PM
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (Jeff7 @ Sep 21 2006, 11:30 PM) *
Time to start a poll for the arrival at Big Crater. Let's see, I'll give maybe 400 sols to Victoria if we hurry. So that'll be somewhere around Sol 1350 for departure. It took almost 900 Sols to explore Endurance and then get to Victoria, minus some time at Purgatory. Assuming 1 stopoff at MiniEndurance, and only 100 Sols there.....let me see here.

Leave Sol 1350. Drive days, lots of drive days. No science. 400 days to get to MiniEndurance, Sol 1750. 100 Sols of exploration. 1850. Another 400 to get to Big Crater. 2250.
Add in times for getting stuck, and more time for science stops that really should be made. Maybe push Sol 2500. Plus possible wheel problems similar to Spirit's, Sol 3000.

While I'd love to see it happen, I think that that's pushing it a little. smile.gif

What'll be the definition of arrival then blink.gif ? The crater is so big!
Anyway, by Sol 3000, MSL will be already there smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Sep 21 2006, 09:57 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2920
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (slinted @ Sep 21 2006, 11:35 PM) *
You're welcome smile.gif
Here's the original mosaic, if anyone else wants to play with it.

Whao!
If Endurance is the crater on the uper left and VC on the South of it (in this case I can also see Erebus) we've already have roved half the distance it'll take to get to the first descent big hill.
I just realise it's just NOT impossible blink.gif
May be one day Oppy will just do what Spirit did : climb a Hill. Umbelievable!!!!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 21 2006, 10:13 PM
Post #25


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (climber @ Sep 21 2006, 10:57 PM) *
we've already have roved half the distance it'll take to get to the first descent big hill.


We've covered just under half the distance to the endurance scale crater between here and 'Big Crater' - in terms of getting to Big Crater - we've covered abotu 30% of the distance required.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 21 2006, 11:33 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (ustrax @ Sep 21 2006, 11:09 PM) *
Tempting ain't it?...

Troy will be ours! ph34r.gif
And we got the only horse that fits for the journey...

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustrax3/troy.jpg

Man...I'm dizzy... blink.gif


Nice diagram Ustrax, a shame it's fiction! tongue.gif

For two reasons - First, most of those features can't be seen in the original images - they are artifacts of Nico's processing. I can only see B, C & F

Here are some 5x vertical + contrast/brightness of the raw 943 pancams:

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


Second, The headings to those features are all wrong, here are the headings of the edges of the three features marked on the themis image.


Attached Image


As you can see B & C are the "Twin Peaks" on the north rim of the crater that we have been able to see for a while. As in my earlier work, the only thing in the direction of "F" is the far rim - It's a long way, but nowhere near as far as the Gusev rim is from Spirit so there is no reason why we shouldn't be able to see that far.

As we've found with the MOC images, sometimes the headings don't quite line up over large distances - I've marked (in light blue) the bit of the rim just offset from the derived heading that looks higher and what I consider to be the best candidate for "F"

James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Sep 21 2006, 11:59 PM
Post #27


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



Can anyone tell if the rim is higher than the Columbia Hills ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 22 2006, 12:29 AM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



If you look at the image I posted back here - http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...ost&p=66855

It's hard to read - but it looks like some of the far rim peaks could be 150+m above the surrounding plains so yes, bigger than the Columbia hills. (And maybe 600-700m above the crater floor!)


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
clt510
post Sep 22 2006, 04:55 AM
Post #29


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 29
Joined: 26-July 05
From: Mississippi
Member No.: 446



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Sep 21 2006, 06:33 PM) *
As you can see B & C are the "Twin Peaks" on the north rim of the crater that we have been able to see for a while. As in my earlier work, the only thing in the direction of "F" is the far rim - It's a long way, but nowhere near as far as the Gusev rim is from Spirit so there is no reason why we shouldn't be able to see that far.


Are you trying to start another near-rim far-rim argument? blink.gif tongue.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 22 2006, 07:02 AM
Post #30


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Oh we've got to stop this smile.gif I'm getting excited about the sort of view we could have from there - and that's bad because I really can't imagine us getting there, realistically.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

12 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 03:02 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.