Getting to 'Big Crater', A little premature speculation |
Getting to 'Big Crater', A little premature speculation |
Sep 21 2006, 04:45 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1619 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
This thread remember me an other thread I made a time ago
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=2327 -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 04:45 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Special Cookie Group: Members Posts: 2168 Joined: 6-April 05 From: Sintra | Portugal Member No.: 228 |
So, "UMSF" will be OK : it's a city under 100,000 aka the proud and glorious Geeksville! -------------------- "Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe |
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 05:51 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
the IAU convention for naming craters on Mars would be named after a city on Earth with a population under 100,000. Well "Elk Grove" is out as of about 2 years ago. I once lived in Bozeman, MT though. That has a nice ring to it. I'll start my naming campaign as soon as we are finished with Victoria. -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 08:12 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
Mad, mad, mad... you're all completely mad. I love it!
Looking at the large-scale image I thought: those knife-sharp rim hills would look sensational from the north with a low light angle, at dawn or sunset. Hmmm... I wonder how wide that ridgeline really is? Now... imagine - if you dare - the view from the top of Priam... -------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 08:47 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Member Group: Senior Member Posts: 136 Joined: 8-August 06 Member No.: 1022 |
|
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 09:30 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 2-March 05 Member No.: 180 |
And I was hesitating on starting talking about this... Beyond!: http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustr...ondvictoria.jpg EDITED: And for what I'm seing that 'Big Crater' doesn't have a name...yet... Time to start a poll for the arrival at Big Crater. Let's see, I'll give maybe 400 sols to Victoria if we hurry. So that'll be somewhere around Sol 1350 for departure. It took almost 900 Sols to explore Endurance and then get to Victoria, minus some time at Purgatory. Assuming 1 stopoff at MiniEndurance, and only 100 Sols there.....let me see here. Leave Sol 1350. Drive days, lots of drive days. No science. 400 days to get to MiniEndurance, Sol 1750. 100 Sols of exploration. 1850. Another 400 to get to Big Crater. 2250. Add in times for getting stuck, and more time for science stops that really should be made. Maybe push Sol 2500. Plus possible wheel problems similar to Spirit's, Sol 3000. While I'd love to see it happen, I think that that's pushing it a little. |
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 09:35 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Member Group: Admin Posts: 468 Joined: 11-February 04 From: USA Member No.: 21 |
|
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 09:49 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2920 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
Time to start a poll for the arrival at Big Crater. Let's see, I'll give maybe 400 sols to Victoria if we hurry. So that'll be somewhere around Sol 1350 for departure. It took almost 900 Sols to explore Endurance and then get to Victoria, minus some time at Purgatory. Assuming 1 stopoff at MiniEndurance, and only 100 Sols there.....let me see here. Leave Sol 1350. Drive days, lots of drive days. No science. 400 days to get to MiniEndurance, Sol 1750. 100 Sols of exploration. 1850. Another 400 to get to Big Crater. 2250. Add in times for getting stuck, and more time for science stops that really should be made. Maybe push Sol 2500. Plus possible wheel problems similar to Spirit's, Sol 3000. While I'd love to see it happen, I think that that's pushing it a little. What'll be the definition of arrival then ? The crater is so big! Anyway, by Sol 3000, MSL will be already there -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 09:57 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2920 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
You're welcome Here's the original mosaic, if anyone else wants to play with it. Whao! If Endurance is the crater on the uper left and VC on the South of it (in this case I can also see Erebus) we've already have roved half the distance it'll take to get to the first descent big hill. I just realise it's just NOT impossible May be one day Oppy will just do what Spirit did : climb a Hill. Umbelievable!!!! -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 10:13 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
we've already have roved half the distance it'll take to get to the first descent big hill. We've covered just under half the distance to the endurance scale crater between here and 'Big Crater' - in terms of getting to Big Crater - we've covered abotu 30% of the distance required. Doug |
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 11:33 PM
Post
#26
|
||||||
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
Tempting ain't it?... Troy will be ours! And we got the only horse that fits for the journey... http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b14/ustrax3/troy.jpg Man...I'm dizzy... Nice diagram Ustrax, a shame it's fiction! For two reasons - First, most of those features can't be seen in the original images - they are artifacts of Nico's processing. I can only see B, C & F Here are some 5x vertical + contrast/brightness of the raw 943 pancams: Second, The headings to those features are all wrong, here are the headings of the edges of the three features marked on the themis image. As you can see B & C are the "Twin Peaks" on the north rim of the crater that we have been able to see for a while. As in my earlier work, the only thing in the direction of "F" is the far rim - It's a long way, but nowhere near as far as the Gusev rim is from Spirit so there is no reason why we shouldn't be able to see that far. As we've found with the MOC images, sometimes the headings don't quite line up over large distances - I've marked (in light blue) the bit of the rim just offset from the derived heading that looks higher and what I consider to be the best candidate for "F" James -------------------- |
|||||
|
||||||
Sep 21 2006, 11:59 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1372 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
Can anyone tell if the rim is higher than the Columbia Hills ?
|
|
|
Sep 22 2006, 12:29 AM
Post
#28
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
If you look at the image I posted back here - http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...ost&p=66855
It's hard to read - but it looks like some of the far rim peaks could be 150+m above the surrounding plains so yes, bigger than the Columbia hills. (And maybe 600-700m above the crater floor!) -------------------- |
|
|
Sep 22 2006, 04:55 AM
Post
#29
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 29 Joined: 26-July 05 From: Mississippi Member No.: 446 |
As you can see B & C are the "Twin Peaks" on the north rim of the crater that we have been able to see for a while. As in my earlier work, the only thing in the direction of "F" is the far rim - It's a long way, but nowhere near as far as the Gusev rim is from Spirit so there is no reason why we shouldn't be able to see that far. Are you trying to start another near-rim far-rim argument? |
|
|
Sep 22 2006, 07:02 AM
Post
#30
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Oh we've got to stop this I'm getting excited about the sort of view we could have from there - and that's bad because I really can't imagine us getting there, realistically.
Doug |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 03:02 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |