How far will NH pass by Pluto?, - and will it be possible to effect a meaningful course change? |
How far will NH pass by Pluto?, - and will it be possible to effect a meaningful course change? |
Guest_Oersted_* |
Apr 16 2008, 02:16 PM
Post
#1
|
Guests |
So, from what I gather, NH will pass by Pluto at a speed of around 14 km/s. I know it won't be able to slow down in any way, and will continue into deep space afterwards, but is a substantial course change envisaged at Pluto, or will it fly by so far away that the course change will be negligible?
I realise that the instruments must be optimised for a pass at a certain distance, but what distance is that and could it possible by reduced with no ill effects? It would be mindblowing if a low pass over Pluto could be planned so that NH will fly close by Charon as well, wouldn't it? - Or maybe even - to go really out on a limb - a few high-speed figure 8's around both bodies, before the probe continues on its merry way. Would that even be physically possible? At least I'm not suggesting aero-braking if Pluto turns out to have a tenuous atmosphere. |
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 02:32 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14434 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 02:38 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
... if Pluto turns out to have a tenuous atmosphere. This is already an established fact. The atmosphere is currently (or should be in the not-so-distant future) in the process of re-freezing to the surface as Pluto moves away from the Sun. -------------------- |
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 02:50 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
NH trajectory through the Pluto system (from NH website)
-------------------- |
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 02:58 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 706 Joined: 3-December 04 From: Boulder, Colorado, USA Member No.: 117 |
Last fall we changed this slightly, updating the closest approach distance from 10,000 km to 12,500 km. This buys us a bit more time near close approach, at the expense of a little spatial resolution. Going much closer wouldn't improve our resolution much because images would be smeared, and we wouldn't have time to cover much territory.
I guess we need to update that graphic! John. |
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 03:03 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 532 Joined: 19-February 05 Member No.: 173 |
Last fall we changed this slightly, updating the closest approach distance from 10,000 km to 12,500 km. This buys us a bit more time near close approach, at the expense of a little spatial resolution. Going much closer wouldn't improve our resolution much because images would be smeared, and we wouldn't have time to cover much territory. I guess we need to update that graphic! John. Here's the updated version. |
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 03:04 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Or maybe even - to go really out on a limb - a few high-speed figure 8's around both bodies, before the probe continues on its merry way. I remember how disappointed I was when I learned that a figure 8 isn't a possible orbit. (Neither is a spiral, for that matter.) If we could just post equations in here, maybe we could have a thread on orbital mechanics . . . --Greg |
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 03:04 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 532 Joined: 19-February 05 Member No.: 173 |
Here's the updated version. This is better.
Attached File(s)
|
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 03:12 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
but is a substantial course change envisaged at Pluto, or will it fly by so far away that the course change will be negligible? Clearly the deflection by Pluto (+moons) is going to be tiny - but I'd be interesting to know just how tiny is it? -------------------- |
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 03:21 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Guest_Oersted_* |
Apr 16 2008, 06:38 PM
Post
#11
|
Guests |
I remember how disappointed I was when I learned that a figure 8 isn't a possible orbit. (Neither is a spiral, for that matter.) If we could just post equations in here, maybe we could have a thread on orbital mechanics . . . --Greg Why isn't a figure 8 or just an S-shaped orbit physically possible? (as opposed to just being not desirable for coverage reasons). Thanks for all the replies and graphics, enlightening indeed! - And not just for me, I'm happy to say, since we seem to have an update on the pass parameters. |
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 06:44 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
Clearly the deflection by Pluto (+moons) is going to be tiny - but I'd be interesting to know just how tiny is it? Well, Pluto has 0.2% the mass of Earth, and New Horizons will pass 12,500 km away. That means the max acceleration due to gravity will be 0.0005 g, or about 0.005 m/s^2. Calculus or modeling are required to get a true answer, but if we assume that that acceleration were in effect for 1500 seconds, it would impart a total delta-v of 7.5 m/s. That should be the right order of magnitude. That is 0.0005 of the velocity of NH (more or less to right angles to its path), which would alter NH's heading by 0.03 degrees. Close enough to zero for you? |
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 07:21 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
My ballpark calculation assuming the impact parameter B is ~= C/A distance and v(c/a) ~= v(inf) and that there's no Charon around gives a deflection angle of 0.02 deg which agrees with JRehling's calculation nicely. For all practical purposes you can neglect Pluto has any mass.
-------------------- |
|
|
Apr 16 2008, 07:40 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8785 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Kinda figured as much...it's not very large, and is mostly made of not-so-massive stuff.
One thing I'd like to know is how much maneuvering propellent NH is currently estimated to have post-Pluto for the KBO encounter, and how large a conic section of space she can feasibly reach (by this I mean total potential delta-V vs. power supply endurance, comm range, etc. if there are any other limiting factors). Also, are there any tentative plans to conduct a retargeting maneuver to reach a KBO prior to the Pluto encounter, or will all this take place afterwards? (I'm guessing that the latter is far more likely based on current planning as shown, plus there's no gravitational assist potential at Pluto to speak of). A Plutino would presumably be the ideal target in terms of feasiblity; IIRC, most of these are approximately coplanar with Pluto's orbit? -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Apr 17 2008, 01:35 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 10-December 06 From: Atlanta Member No.: 1472 |
Looking at the encounter image, it seems that the trajectory is designed such that at closest distance to Pluto, NH is essentially 180 degree off Charon. I guess the design has scarified imaging resolution for the chance of doing radio science during occlusions. Is this the main reason or are there other considerations that forced the trajectory to be where it is? Also, is it possible for Pluto to have any rings (vis-a-vis Rhea)? And if so, is there any planning to look for them (long exposures and such)?
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th September 2024 - 02:48 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |