MSL Post Landing - Commissioning Period & Early Observations, Commissioning Activity Period 1B - Sols 9 through 16 |
![]() ![]() |
MSL Post Landing - Commissioning Period & Early Observations, Commissioning Activity Period 1B - Sols 9 through 16 |
Aug 30 2012, 08:42 PM
Post
#301
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 279 Joined: 10-September 08 Member No.: 4338 |
http://marsweather.com ADMIN: Link fixed
There seems to be a new website in preparation for the weather reports. But at there and the old site http://cab.inta-csic.es/rems/marsweather.html which is up to Sol 22 now, I notice there is no entry for the humidity. The humidity sensor is on Boom 2, the damaged boom. Does that mean the humidity sensor is non-operational? (Although that was not mentioned at the press conference where the damage was discussed.) |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2012, 08:52 PM
Post
#302
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4159 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
I setup a MSL Route Map thread to keep record of Curiosity path during the mission.
Some basic rules are on the first post but here too, just in case. (Phil, I "stole" your yesterday post here for that purpose. Hope you don't mind Thread created for posting MSL route maps and map updates. Comments / suggestions adding value to the route maps are allowed, but discussions regarding the route itself and "future" paths are not. Use the currently active thread for the latter. |
|
|
|
Aug 31 2012, 09:17 PM
Post
#303
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 275 Joined: 11-December 07 From: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Member No.: 3978 |
There seems to be a new website in preparation for the weather reports. which is up to Sol 22 now, I notice there is no entry for the humidity. The humidity sensor is on Boom 2, the damaged boom. Does that mean the humidity sensor is non-operational? (Although that was not mentioned at the press conference where the damage was discussed.) I noticed the websites too marsophile. The humidity data must be missing for that reason (though according to the bbc which is where I got the news first they implied it was wind sensors only that might suffer a glitch.) Whether or not they can recover the data is up to there engineering wizards. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Aug 31 2012, 09:35 PM
Post
#304
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1037 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
The humidity sensor is on Boom 2, the damaged boom. Does that mean the humidity sensor is non-operational? I had the impression that the wind sensors were more fragile than the humidity sensor. http://cab.inta-csic.es/rems/rems_instrument.html I don't know, but I'd be surprised if the humidity sensor was damaged. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2012, 06:01 PM
Post
#305
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 738 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
All is explained. The Vaisala data sheet indicates that the probe measures relative humidity so this is probably no more than an descriptive error on the weather page. Sounds good, though trying to specify an average relative humidity during the day with such large temperature swings becomes difficult to interpret. If we assume the specific humidity is approximately constant, then the saturation vapor pressure during the day would vary by orders of magnitude, as would the relative humidity. It is impressive though the range of temperatures the probe can measure RH at: http://cab.inta-csic.es/rems/rems_RHS_en.html -------------------- Steve [ my planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
|
Sep 1 2012, 11:56 PM
Post
#306
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 251 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
If we assume the specific humidity is approximately constant, then the saturation vapor pressure during the day would vary by orders of magnitude, as would the relative humidity. http://cab.inta-csic.es/rems/rems_RHS_en.html Yeah, the thing is that a miniscule amount of water vapor remains miniscule regardless of the temperature driven level of saturation so specific or absolute humidity (rather than RH) would be the best metric. |
|
|
|
Sep 6 2012, 08:39 AM
Post
#307
|
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 4159 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
Moved several posts related to the Descent Stage and debris to the MSL EDL Hardware thread.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 08:46 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here. |
|