NASA Images Suggest Water Still Flows on Mars |
NASA Images Suggest Water Still Flows on Mars |
Guest_Sunspot_* |
Dec 4 2006, 09:25 PM
Post
#1
|
Guests |
Dec. 4, 2006
Dwayne Brown/Erica Hupp Headquarters, Washington 202-358-1726/1237 Guy Webster Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. 818-354-6278 MEDIA ADVISORY: M06-186 NASA SCHEDULES BRIEFING TO ANNOUNCE SIGNIFICANT FIND ON MARS WASHINGTON - NASA hosts a news briefing at 1 p.m. EST, Wednesday, Dec. 6, to present new science results from the Mars Global Surveyor. The briefing will take place in the NASA Headquarters auditorium located at 300 E Street, S.W. in Washington and carried live on NASA Television and www.nasa.gov. The agency last week announced the spacecraft's mission may be at its end. Mars Global Surveyor has served the longest and been the most productive of any spacecraft ever sent to the red planet. Data gathered from the mission will continue to be analyzed by scientists. Panelists include: - Michael Meyer -- Lead Scientist, Mars Exploration Program, NASA Headquarters, Washington - Michael Malin -- President and Chief Scientist, Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego, Calif. - Kenneth Edgett -- Scientist, Malin Space Science Systems - Philip Christensen -- Professor, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz. |
|
|
Dec 4 2006, 10:08 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 8-May 05 Member No.: 381 |
The presence of Philip Christensen (PI for TES) on the panel may indicate the discovery of a new spectral feature on Mars. That could be very interesting, and downright thrilling if CRISM and HiRISE follow up on it!
|
|
|
Dec 5 2006, 09:22 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 4280 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
I just found this while reading NASA Watch; perhaps it is related to Wednesday's briefing. Take it with A LOT of care; it might be just smoke.
Editor's note: According to an item first posted by Aviation Week and Space Technology magazine: "NASA is ready to announce major new findings about the presence of water currently emerging onto the surface of Mars. http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2006/12/...n_week_e_1.html |
|
|
Dec 5 2006, 09:51 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14449 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
It's impossible to know where smoke ends and facts start with NW nowadays - it's turned into KC's personal ranting-blog instead of a reliable news source, a pity really. However the AW speculation is likely to be fairly sound.
Doug |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Dec 5 2006, 04:10 PM
Post
#5
|
Guests |
It's impossible to know where smoke ends and facts start with NW nowadays - it's turned into KC's personal ranting-blog instead of a reliable news source, a pity really. However the AW speculation is likely to be fairly sound. As for Cowing's "ranting," what's really funny is this little bit:
I guess he hasn't been getting any rides on NASA One lately. EDIT: Apparently, my original post has created some flak for Doug. Although this is a discussion forum, I should have stated what I thought was obvious, that that was my opinion, not Doug's. I apologize for any inconvenience to Doug or UMSF, both of whom/which I hold in high regard. For that reason, I've edited the statement by deleting a sentence. Hopefully, this will end the harangue Doug has been enduring from a certain person. Though I do stand by the "ranting" part This post has been edited by AlexBlackwell: Dec 12 2006, 05:52 PM |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Dec 5 2006, 04:14 PM
Post
#6
|
Guests |
The presence of Philip Christensen (PI for TES) on the panel may indicate the discovery of a new spectral feature on Mars. That could be very interesting, and downright thrilling if CRISM and HiRISE follow up on it! Listen very carefully, and I mean carefully, to the very last bit of Christensen's recent interview on Planetary Radio (which was posted yesterday). |
|
|
Guest_Sunspot_* |
Dec 5 2006, 04:52 PM
Post
#7
|
Guests |
Gullies
|
|
|
Dec 5 2006, 05:53 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 7-July 06 From: Selden, NY Member No.: 960 |
A few points:
1) Remember that a TES "pixel" or footprint is 3 x 8 km, so any interesting region with a new spectral feature would have to be at least this big. Typically we like to see the same feature in a few pixels to believe that its really there. In addition, TES hasn't been mapping mineralogy for quite some time due to a "glitch" that has degraded the spectral data. Recently TES has been used for thermal inertia and atmospheric studies. 2) I don't know, because I haven't talked to him about it, but listening to the interview, I would guess that the gullies to which Phil was referring were those he discussed in a Nature (I think) paper a few years ago which also show a "pasted-on" terrain near the gullies which he hypothesized to be dust-covered snow. If there's a new major announcement regarding these gullies and MGS, its probably some new interesting MOC imagery. but then again, I've been wrong before, so who knows? |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Dec 5 2006, 06:08 PM
Post
#9
|
Guests |
2) I don't know, because I haven't talked to him about it, but listening to the interview, I would guess that the gullies to which Phil was referring were those he discussed in a Nature (I think) paper a few years ago which also show a "pasted-on" terrain near the gullies which he hypothesized to be dust-covered snow. Hmmm... I'm wondering if we should bone up Malin and Edgett's 2000 paper in Science, as well as Christensen's Nature paper. Also, a 2003 PSRD release might be good reading. This post has been edited by AlexBlackwell: Dec 5 2006, 06:30 PM |
|
|
Dec 5 2006, 06:29 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
This definitely sounds like it belongs to a separate thread. It's urelated to the MGS mishap. And Alex, why do I get the distinct feeling you know something we don't?
-------------------- |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Dec 5 2006, 08:00 PM
Post
#11
|
Guests |
Per Gordan's suggestion, I'll start a new thread on this topic and merge the other posts into it.
EDIT: And Alex, why do I get the distinct feeling you know something we don't? Like most people here, I'm just guessing. That said, I wonder if Christensen will mention his "THOR" mission concept tomorrow? This post has been edited by AlexBlackwell: Dec 5 2006, 08:15 PM |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Dec 5 2006, 08:24 PM
Post
#12
|
Guests |
Leonard David has a brief blurb in his blog.
This post has been edited by AlexBlackwell: Dec 5 2006, 08:42 PM |
|
|
Dec 5 2006, 08:31 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3242 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Maybe a gully seen recently but not seen in older MOC images? Phil Christensen could be there to present spectroscopy results of said "new" gully from TES or THEMIS.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Dec 6 2006, 01:03 AM
Post
#14
|
Guests |
Maybe a gully seen recently but not seen in older MOC images? Phil Christensen could be there to present spectroscopy results of said "new" gully from TES or THEMIS. You could be right. However, since we're just speculating, I'm wondering if, as tglotch alluded to above, Christensen might be there to discuss and expand on his gully formation model, as published in the Nature paper. And note that Christensen's results in 2003 were based not on THEMIS IR (let alone lower res TES) but rather on THEMIS VIS imagery, which gave a more synpotic view of the gully sites than MOC NA. Again, just speculating, but maybe Malin and Edgett have detected noticeable changes in already-mapped gully sites and/or have added more gully sites to the existing database increasing the coverage over the mid-latitudes? Whatever the results turn out to be, tomorrow should be interesting. EDIT: One should note the fundamental difference between the Malin/Edgett model and Christensen's. In the former, a subsurface origin for the seeps, which implies near-surface reservoirs and/or aquifers, is posited; in the latter, basal melting from overlying snowpacks (due to Mars' obliquity excursions) is invoked. So if tomorrow's press conference is about gullies, and if Malin/Edgett and Christensen have come to some common view on the formation mechanism(s), that, in and of itself, is interesting. This post has been edited by AlexBlackwell: Dec 6 2006, 01:23 AM |
|
|
Dec 6 2006, 06:47 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 112 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Canberra Member No.: 558 |
One should note the fundamental difference between the Malin/Edgett model and Christensen's. In the former, a subsurface origin for the seeps, which implies near-surface reservoirs and/or aquifers, is posited; in the latter, basal melting from overlying snowpacks (due to Mars' obliquity excursions) is invoked. So if tomorrow's press conference is about gullies, and if Malin/Edgett and Christensen have come to some common view on the formation mechanism(s), that, in and of itself, is interesting. Why should they not both be right in different places? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th November 2024 - 06:01 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |