IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

10 Pages V  « < 8 9 10  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
KIC 8462852 Observations
HSchirmer
post May 23 2017, 05:39 AM
Post #136


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 273
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (HSchirmer @ May 23 2017, 03:36 AM) *
Well, on the other hand, the recent 3% dip MIGHT indicate that the pattern with the 22% dip is repeating.
If so, then this is VERY interesting for 2 reasons.

First, we actually get to analyze the dips as they happen, with spectra.
Second, this would place whatever-is-causing-the-dips roughly within the goldilocks zone of the star


Oh, wow... a third point...
https://twitter.com/david_kipping/status/866127740776456192
These dips last for days.
If this is something with a 750 day circular orbit, then each day of occultation represents an arc 700,000km long.
Then the recent 3% dip over 2.5 days requires something opaque that is
roughly 5 sun (sol) diameters in length, and perhaps 2 Jupiters wide,
moving between Tabby's Star and us. If it's not completely opaque, then it's got to be even bigger.

Wow, that's big.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post May 24 2017, 07:12 PM
Post #137


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1833
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



KIC 8462852: Will the Trojans return in 2021?

QUOTE
We aim at offering a relatively natural solution, invoking only phenomena that have been previously observed, although perhaps in larger or more massive versions. We model the system using a large, ringed body whose transit produces the first dimming and a swarm of Trojan objects sharing its orbit that causes the second period of multiple dimmings. The resulting orbital period is T≈12 years, with a semi-major axis a≈6 au. In this context the recent observation of a minor dimming can be explained as a secondary eclipse produced by the passage of the planet behind the star. Our model allows us to make two straightforward predictions: we expect the passage of a new swarm of Trojans in front of the star starting during the early months of 2021, and a new transit of the main object during the first half of 2023.


https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08427
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post May 24 2017, 11:56 PM
Post #138


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 273
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (alan @ May 24 2017, 07:12 PM) *
KIC 8462852: Will the Trojans return in 2021?

https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08427


Good paper, great graphics.

They're proposing a mega-saturn, with rings that reflect 3% of the starlight back at us as it transits in 3 days.
At 6AU, [edit] not sure that a 3 day transit fits with the orbital velocity or ring size.

[revised the calculations..]
The area of Tabby's Star that we can see is basically a circle.
The star is listed as being about 1.5 solar radii across, (radius of sun is ~700,000 km)
Consider the area of a circle is r^2 so 1.5 radius =~7 area in srs (sol radii squared)

To reflect 3% more light, you need at minimum, 3% more surface area for the rings,
And 3% of 7 gives 0.21 srs in area. Divide by gives .067, take square root gives .25 as radius, or 180,000 km.
That's workable, Saturn's rings go to eh, 80,000 km, so it's a bigger version of something we've seen.
[edit] and it's within observed J1407 "super saturn" with rings 90,000,000 km in radius.

Main question for that, is whether the planet and rings that size would transit the star in 3 days.
Orbiting at 6AU, distance around the orbit would be x diameter or 12AU traveled over 12 years.
[edited to add the correct number of zeros]
Each year it travels AU, or 3.14 x 150,000,000 km or 471,000,000 km.
Over 365 days, that's 1,290,000 km per day, over the 3 days of the transit,
the planet moves 3,870,000 km.

So, at 6AU, you need rings almost 3,870,000 km across to cause a 3 day event.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hendric
post May 25 2017, 04:56 PM
Post #139


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 834
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



1 AU is 150,000,000 km, not 150,000.


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post May 25 2017, 05:33 PM
Post #140


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 273
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (hendric @ May 25 2017, 04:56 PM) *
1 AU is 150,000,000 km, not 150,000.


Sorry about that, went back and added the correct number of 000s.


Actually, this proposal is rather similar to J1407, the "super saturn".
That's a planet with rings 90,000,000 km in radius, orbit of 4-14 years, and a 56 day transit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dudley
post May 26 2017, 04:15 PM
Post #141


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 27-March 15
Member No.: 7426



This new hypothesis calls for a planet about 30 percent the size of KIC 8462852, exclusive of the rings, so much larger than Jupiter. Isn't it thought that planets don't grow much larger than Jupiter, but merely become denser, compressed by their own gravity?
Then, too, an object on this scale would fuse hydrogen at its core, wouldn't it? That would make for a conspicuous second star in the Boyajian's Star system. Such a star has not been reported.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post May 26 2017, 10:34 PM
Post #142


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 273
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (dudley @ May 26 2017, 05:15 PM) *
This new hypothesis calls for a planet about 30 percent the size of KIC 8462852, exclusive of the rings, so much larger than Jupiter. Isn't it thought that planets don't grow much larger than Jupiter, but merely become denser, compressed by their own gravity?
Then, too, an object on this scale would fuse hydrogen at its core, wouldn't it? That would make for a conspicuous second star in the Boyajian's Star system. Such a star has not been reported.


Here's an interesting theory - good attempts to combine explanation of long term dimming AND mega transits.

What if Tabby's star is slowly dimming because it ate a Jovian sized planet about a thousand years ago?
What if Tabby's star is obscured by the Jovian icy moons which are now short period mega comets?

System appears to have a distant companion star, which could pull gas giants into elliptical orbits.
Models suggest that a Jovian size planet forced into an elliptical orbit will end up stripped of it's large icy moons.
The moons go into short period comet style orbits, i.e. imagine Europa, Ganymede, Callisto as sun grazing comets.
Those icy moons would produce massive outgassing and massive dips in brightness.
The Jovian planet ends up disrupted and digested, the star's brightness peaks due to a dump of gravitational energy.
You get a slow dimming as the star returns to normal brightness over hundreds or thousands of years.

QUOTE (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=risNfZxz6DQ)
Cool Worlds video by Brian Metzger and Nick Stone on their hypothesis for Tabby's Star behaviour
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post May 27 2017, 09:26 AM
Post #143


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3433
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



For me that's the first suggestion that sounds really plausible. In their video they mention that a possible argument against is the issue of frequency, in other words that the presumed rarity and short-lived nature of such an event makes it very unlikely that one would have been observed. I don't see that as much of a problem given the uncertainties involved and the fact that this is (so far) a unique example.

They consider also in the video the likely effects of a star swallowing anything ranging from Moon-sized to Jupiter-sized, but why stop there? How about Trappist-1-sized? That recent discovery, though also unique so far, must be upping our estimates of the prevalence of very compact systems available for disruption by stellar companions.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HSchirmer
post May 27 2017, 10:27 AM
Post #144


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 273
Joined: 24-July 15
Member No.: 7619



QUOTE (ngunn @ May 27 2017, 10:26 AM) *
They consider also in the video the likely effects of a star swallowing anything ranging from Moon-sized to Jupiter-sized, but why stop there? How about Trappist-1-sized?


Yep, that could happen.
I think the emphasis is more about a gas-giant that forms at the snowline, and ends up eccentric,
which isn't uncommon, e.g. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1205/1205.2429.pdf

because you'd also expect exo-Galilean moons (e.g. icy bodies which would otherwise qualify as dwarf planets)
which remain after the planet is gone, but end up on short period comet style orbits,
so the 3% and 20% dips result from truly giant comets. (Giant as in a nucleus the size of Mars)

Think of an orbit something like HD 80606b
e.g. http://www.space.com/6364-exoplanet-sees-e...heat-waves.html
but an ice-ball might have a freeze-thaw water atmosphere, and perhaps a freeze-thaw ocean...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongo
post Jun 14 2017, 02:49 PM
Post #145


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 706
Joined: 13-June 04
Member No.: 82



Another dip starting?

From Kepler Star KIC 8462852 Amateur Photometry Monitoring Project:


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongo
post Jun 19 2017, 01:56 AM
Post #146


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 706
Joined: 13-June 04
Member No.: 82



A short update on the current dip, so far it seems to be tracking the previous dip on days 1566-1569.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U30v_jlk3GY
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

10 Pages V  « < 8 9 10
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st September 2017 - 03:26 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.