IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >  
Closed TopicStart new topic
LCROSS en route
Phil Stooke
post Sep 29 2009, 01:45 PM
Post #31


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/386497main_target-selection_web2.pdf

This link goes to a c. 12 MB PDF on target selection. Page 8 has a map showing a more likely location. May not be exact, but pretty close. (see also p. 19)

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Moore
post Sep 29 2009, 03:06 PM
Post #32


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 22-May 09
From: Ireland
Member No.: 4792



Thanks Phil

Page 19 is very useful and probably more relevant, (the yellow dots in p8 are more than likely just ID crater centres).

As this is a Sept 5 publication and the text is still referring to Cabeus A to be the main target (p23 and elsewhere), the target corrections will undouptedly be refined down the closer to impact date.

Whatever one is chosen, however, it's sure to be a good'un smile.gif

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tanjent
post Sep 29 2009, 04:34 PM
Post #33


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 214
Joined: 30-December 05
Member No.: 628



Note that in the Colaprete report the Earth observability constraint is actually violated by the Cabeus site that is now the preferred target.
In return for a 50% gain in the Pixon signal (listed as criterion #2), they accepted a 125% increase (0.63 to 1.42) in the solar mask (criterion #1) and almost a ninefold
increase (0.33 to 3.07) in the earth observability mask (criterion #3). It's kind of hard to reconcile the ex-ante criteria with the subsequently revealed preference
unless the key lies in page 2 "Data not released to the public by individual Projects and Principal Investigators has been removed." To be accurate, that would have to cover the subsequently discovered data too, of course.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 29 2009, 04:55 PM
Post #34


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The latest release did refer to new topographic data showing better illumination than they had anticipated. The Earth observability mask would be very dependent on the exact location chosen, so a small move could alter it significantly.

I really want a map showing the exact location! Also, this is the Centaur target. The second impact site has not been announced yet. It would be nearby, but Colaprete talked about it at LPSC in March 09, responding to a question from me, saying that it might go to a spot with different illumination conditions, like the edge of a permanent shadow area if the Centaur went deep into the shadow area.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Sep 29 2009, 08:19 PM
Post #35


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Ask and ye shall receive smile.gif I asked your questions of Tony Colaprete. He replied that he was hoping to get a map released today, and that the LCROSS ship itself would be targeted somewhat (3 km) away from the Centaur site in order to test a different location.

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 2 2009, 03:30 PM
Post #36


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Here's a map of the approximate locations of the three polar impacts - LCROSS (counting as one) and MIP and Lunar Prospector. Only approximate as we still don't have actual coordinates for MIP or the LCROSS target.

I have taken the Cabeus area from LOLA data. It's much better shown here than on the current map on the LCROSS website, which appears to show Cabeus with half its real diameter. That older map is derived from an outdated USGS relief drawing.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Oct 2 2009, 04:03 PM
Post #37


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



What are the coordinates of the different impact sites?

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tman
post Oct 2 2009, 04:35 PM
Post #38


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 877
Joined: 7-March 05
From: Switzerland
Member No.: 186



The Google group of LCROSS (amateur) Observation has updated its page too: http://groups.google.com/group/lcross_obse...ion/web/finders
QUOTE
Cabeus has selenolographic coordinates of 84.9°S 35.5° W. The target PSR's coordinates have not been official announced but are estimated at approximately 84.4°S 45.0°W


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 2 2009, 08:06 PM
Post #39


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



From the Observation Group website:

-------------------------
Hello Team!

Latest update on impact locations:
Centaur: -84.70, 310.95E
SSC: -84.77, 310.45E
These are final and should not change.


Nominal timing for impacts:
Centaur = 9 Oct 2009 11:31:30 UTC
SSC = 9 Oct 2009 11:35:45 UTC
There may be some variation from these nominal times through remaining
trajectory correction maneuvering. We will post updates to these times
as they become available. Any timing updates on impact night will be
posted to LCROSS Twitter page, LCROSS Facebook page, and LCROSS-CS.


Brian
----------------------
Final LCROSS Centaur and SSC target coordinates (Lat., Lon. in ME)
Centaur: -84.675, 311.275 E
SSC: -84.729, 310.64 E


Elevations (Assumed Lunar radius: 1737.4 km):
Centaur target elev: -3.82693 km
SSC target elev: -3.80909 km

Impact Times:
Centaur: 9 Oct 2009 11:31:30 UTC
SSC: 9 Oct 2009 11:35:45 UTC

Note: These are nominal impact positions and times. Actual impact
times based on TCM results may differ (see next slide for
uncertainties)
----------------------------
That point is slightly west of the position shown on my map.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Moore
post Oct 2 2009, 10:41 PM
Post #40


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 22-May 09
From: Ireland
Member No.: 4792



Took the latter coords., -- rough idea, therefore, but not exact.

John

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 3 2009, 08:45 PM
Post #41


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Here's the latest info from Tony Colaprete, via the LCROSS Observation Group:

http://lcross.arc.nasa.gov/docs/LCROSS_Tar...date_100209.ppt

LCROSS Observation Group:

http://groups.google.com/group/lcross_observation

And a modified version of his map:

Attached Image


"Centaur Impact indicated by Red circle, SSC impact indicated by Blue circle"
The shading is LOLA elevation, not hydrogen abundance.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dmuller
post Oct 4 2009, 12:53 AM
Post #42


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 340
Joined: 11-April 08
From: Sydney, Australia
Member No.: 4093



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Oct 3 2009, 06:06 AM) *
Nominal timing for impacts:
Centaur = 9 Oct 2009 11:31:30 UTC
SSC = 9 Oct 2009 11:35:45 UTC

Thanks Phil, this is very useful. Updated my realtime simulations with that info. Having troubles finding anything of a timeline of upcoming events, or the very latest trajectory info for that matter - the data on the Horizons system has LCROSS going through the moon blink.gif and I could not find any SPICE kernels. Unfortunately I'll be on the road for most of next week and can only "tweak" my existing trajectory data to match predicted impact times, can't process SPICE kernels on the road.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Moore
post Oct 4 2009, 02:01 PM
Post #43


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 22-May 09
From: Ireland
Member No.: 4792



That's better!

The recent DIVINER image is proving quite useful to 'see' the area they're aiming at... LINK ...looks like it's in a shallow spot of two small merged impact craters.

John
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Oct 4 2009, 02:36 PM
Post #44


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



This is what I get by overlaying Colaprete's map over Diviner to check the position.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
John Moore
post Oct 4 2009, 03:45 PM
Post #45


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 156
Joined: 22-May 09
From: Ireland
Member No.: 4792






Isn't that exact same as in my link above?

John

I don't know - but you inline quoted everything from the previous quote. Stop it. Final warning. Further posts will just be deleted - ADMIN
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

5 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 5 >
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 10:49 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.