IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

30 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
New Horizons Jupiter Encounter
hendric
post Jan 21 2007, 08:06 AM
Post #46


Director of Galilean Photography
***

Group: Members
Posts: 896
Joined: 15-July 04
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 93



I hope those Kodak moments come out well; I'm not sure how well the models show the edge of Jupiter's atmosphere. Seeing the refraction of the moons through the atmosphere will be pretty cool though!

Seeing the images starting to come in from this flyby has me missing Galileo...Jupiter, to me, is the most photogenic place in the solar system, with its dynamic weather and unique moons.

I know we send probes for science, and to answer questions, but I feel that visiting beautiful places is always a worthwhile endeavor.


--------------------
Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
--
"The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke
Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Analyst_*
post Jan 21 2007, 08:12 AM
Post #47





Guests






Thank you very much for the timeline, John.

Analyst
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Jan 21 2007, 05:54 PM
Post #48





Guests






How will the Jupiter flyby affect the speed of New Horizons?
Will it really become the fastest traveling spacecraft ever? huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yaohua2000
post Jan 21 2007, 07:08 PM
Post #49


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 86
Joined: 12-October 05
From: Beijing
Member No.: 526



QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Jan 22 2007, 01:54 AM) *
quote in reply! removed


No.

The solar probe Helios 2 was the fastest travelling spacecraft ever, at about 69 km/s relative to the Sun. I do not think any outer solar system probes in near future could have a higher speed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Jan 21 2007, 08:13 PM
Post #50


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



That's true but Helios remains in orbit around the Sun so despite having an exceptionally high sun relative velocity at perihelion it does not have enough oribital energy to leave the solar system. In that sense it is not as "fast" as NH which is on an escape trajectory (or will be once it gets that boost from Jupiter).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 21 2007, 08:46 PM
Post #51


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Exactly, if we're talking about highest speeds on equal terms, we should consider hyperbolic escape velocities.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Analyst_*
post Jan 21 2007, 09:13 PM
Post #52





Guests






And then Voyager 1 is and will remain the fastest.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jan 22 2007, 09:48 AM
Post #53


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2918
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



Agree on escape trajectory, nevertheless, for the fun of it, what object was the fastest ever : could it be Jupiter's probe from Galileo ?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Analyst_*
post Jan 22 2007, 11:58 AM
Post #54





Guests






QUOTE (climber @ Jan 22 2007, 10:48 AM) *
What object was the fastest ever?


Relative to what? Sun, Earth, Jupiter ...?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 22 2007, 12:24 PM
Post #55


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (Analyst @ Jan 22 2007, 12:58 PM) *
Relative to what? Sun, Earth, Jupiter ...?

Galactic center?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jan 22 2007, 12:57 PM
Post #56


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 22 2007, 12:24 PM) *
Galactic center?


Great Attractor?

Seriously, though, velocity at departure from Earth might be one way of doing it - or even days in flight/distance from Earth (aha! which side of the orbit... ...oh, bother!).


Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 22 2007, 01:06 PM
Post #57


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Bob, in that case it would be more fitting to talk about energy, not velocity, specifically Characteristic energy. A smaller payload can get propelled faster so energies are a better way to directly compare things. Talking about speed is just a way to invoke that "oooh" factor in laymen, nothing else.
It's All Relative ™, anyway...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jan 22 2007, 01:22 PM
Post #58


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jan 22 2007, 01:06 PM) *
Bob, in that case it would be more fitting to talk about energy, not velocity, specifically Characteristic energy. A smaller payload can get propelled faster so energies are a better way to directly compare things. Talking about speed is just a way to invoke that "oooh" factor in laymen, nothing else.
It's All Relative ™, anyway...


Yes, I'd been idly musing in that direction... ...really, we'd need a new unit of energy, too - something comparable to area (the Wales) or mass (the US Naval Destroyer).


Bob Shaw


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jan 22 2007, 02:01 PM
Post #59


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2918
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (Analyst @ Jan 22 2007, 12:58 PM) *
Relative to what? Sun, Earth, Jupiter ...?

Well, I've got the point of "relative to what..." but, my dear Analyst, on the post before mine you said "And then Voyager 1 is and will remain the fastest." So, for man made objects, what about gain of acceleration since launch? Does it make sense to you? Beware : wheel.gif doesn't count biggrin.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Del Palmer
post Jan 22 2007, 02:35 PM
Post #60


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 213
Joined: 21-January 07
From: Wigan, England
Member No.: 1638



I've uploaded an audio recording of the press briefing for anyone who missed it:
http://www.cafesociety.uk.com/other/New-Horizons-Jupiter.mp3
(right-click on the link and select "Save Target As..." to download.

Perhaps one of these days NASA will create a searchable archive of NASA TV briefings (well I can dream...) :--)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

30 Pages V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 05:25 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.