IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Victoria - working names of features
jamescanvin
post Sep 21 2006, 02:49 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Very soon smile.gif we're going to have a hell of a lot of features of Victoria to discuss, so I think it's about time we had some way of telling each other which bits we are talking about. (A bit like naming craters Alpha, Beta.. Zeta, etc)

I know Stu started to label a few features, but only a few, and there are A LOT!

I've tried to divide Victoria into logical sections and given each a letter. Then within each region I've numbered each point of the rim that appears to bend in the opposite way to the curve of the crater, hence numbering "Capes". Some are quite subtle and therefore may not be seen very well in reality but I think it's better to have them all in there.

Here is the map, it is externally linked so should be updated with the latest version. (Now updated with the (half scale) HiRise image)



(Click image for larger version, ~400kB)

So:
A1 is Cape Verde
A2 is The Beacon
P4 is Cabo Frio
and as of the 943 drive we can see the far rim between E2 and K1.

Of course I'm sure that some of the more prominent features will soon acquire more meaningful names, but this should still help us all follow what we're all talking about!

Bays are given the same designation as the cape on there 'clockwise side', thus most of the major bays (which tend to separate lettered regions) then have a "1" designation (making the rule easier to remember). Bay A1, where Oppy is heading first is Duck Bay and the bay that Fredk has measured the slope of is Bay I1. Most of the major bays are marked in red.

JPL's names are also added, as are their numbered capes and bays - in square brackets.
Informal UMSF names are added within round brackets.

James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 21 2006, 02:55 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Works for me, James.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Sep 21 2006, 03:05 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Coincidentally, Mark Adler (who has been doing a nice job as Emily's guest blogger this week) just posted some relevant comments regarding this very topic. He's described the naming convention that the MER team is using for the features at Victoria.
QUOTE
Each of the protrusions on the far rim are being called "capes" and some of the indents between them "bays". Some are getting names like Cape Verde and Duck Bay, and most are getting numbers, Cape4, Bay2.
It would be nice if we could use the same names, but unfortunately it will probably be some time before we learn more about the official names...so your proposal works for me, as well.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 21 2006, 03:12 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



James, I was just trying to think of a temporary naming scheme myself - again today you've managed to transform my wishes into reality! biggrin.gif

I'm OK with your scheme as far as capes go, but what do you suggest for naming bays? "The bay between H1 and I1" is a bit tedious, but perhaps just "bay H1-I1"?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 21 2006, 03:32 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (fredk @ Sep 21 2006, 01:12 PM) *
James, I was just trying to think of a temporary naming scheme myself - again today you've managed to transform my wishes into reality! biggrin.gif


And only yesterday I was just starting to think - "I wonder if I could estimate the slope of some bays using the MOC and Navcams" before seeing your post doing the very calculation. Great minds think alike, as they say. wink.gif

QUOTE (fredk @ Sep 21 2006, 01:12 PM) *
I'm OK with your scheme as far as capes go, but what do you suggest for naming bays? "The bay between H1 and I1" is a bit tedious, but perhaps just "bay H1-I1"?


Yeah I was thinking about that, and I think "Bay H1-I1", etc. is they way to go, unless we adopted some convention where the bay has the same name as the cape clockwise(or anti) of it. But maybe that would get confusing, "Is it the cape clockwise of the bay, or the bay clockwise of the cape?" unsure.gif

James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 21 2006, 05:30 AM
Post #6


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Sep 21 2006, 02:49 AM) *
I know Stu started to label a few features, but only a few, and there are A LOT!


Doesn't matter; no-one paid the slightest bit of attention to my suggestions anyway. Numbering makes sense, tho if we were being daring and creative we could come up with something better I'm sure... naaah, let's stick with numbers, your map is excellent James, a great starting point. I'm sure we'll have the real names soon enough, they're probably already decided upon anyway by the MER guys. smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 21 2006, 05:56 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Sep 21 2006, 03:32 AM) *
And only yesterday I was just starting to think - "I wonder if I could estimate the slope of some bays using the MOC and Navcams" before seeing your post doing the very calculation. Great minds think alike, as they say. wink.gif

Alike indeed! But you know, there are plenty more bays on this "shore", and there's nothing like independent confirmation to boost the confidence of even a "great mind". wink.gif

But it's not like we can't think of a thousand other things to do with these pictures, and oh yeah, almost forgot, perhaps actually get a bit of work done that we're actually paid to do! laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 21 2006, 06:02 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Sep 21 2006, 01:32 PM) *
unless we adopted some convention where the bay has the same name as the cape clockwise(or anti) of it. But maybe that would get confusing, "Is it the cape clockwise of the bay, or the bay clockwise of the cape?" unsure.gif


Actually, thinking about it some more, this could work. If bays are given the same designation as the cape on there clockwise side then most of the major bays (which tend to seperate lettered regions) would have a "1" designation making the scheme easier to remember. Duck Bay would be "Bay A1" and the bay that Fredk has measured the slope of would be "Bay I1"

James


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 21 2006, 10:24 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Cape and Bay works, too. We can adopt a temporary alpha-numeric scheme and revise that to whatever JPL/Cornell use. Remember, "informal" and formal names.

I was in-informally thinking along the lines of salients and recesses, but this ain't tectonic...

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aberdeenastro
post Sep 21 2006, 12:06 PM
Post #10


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 64
Joined: 24-May 06
From: Aberdeen, Scotland
Member No.: 785



Does anybody know when the clean (i.e. unlabelled) version of the latest Victoria base image will be released by MSSS? And what number will it have?

Castor
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 21 2006, 02:08 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



For a date I don't know for sure; there was talk about an October release.
About numbering it should be S11-00471.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 21 2006, 03:32 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (jamescanvin @ Sep 21 2006, 06:02 AM) *
Actually, thinking about it some more, this could work. If bays are given the same designation as the cape on there clockwise side then most of the major bays (which tend to seperate lettered regions) would have a "1" designation making the scheme easier to remember. Duck Bay would be "Bay A1" and the bay that Fredk has measured the slope of would be "Bay I1"

I like this abbreviated bay notation. Let's use it!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Bobby_*
post Sep 21 2006, 04:02 PM
Post #13





Guests






I think all the features should be named for all the diehards in both forums who talk about The Rovers and their Journeys and Discoveries. It would be great to honor us all. biggrin.gif

Just imagine seeing Tesheiner Ridge, fredk outlook, Horton's viewpoint, Stu Ripples down at the bottom, Doug's overhang or jamescanvin Coffee Stop at Beacon??? LOL

rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 21 2006, 04:14 PM
Post #14


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



With all due respect to our Boss, I'm not entirely sure I want to see hi-resolution, enhanced views of Doug's, er, "overhang"...!!!! ohmy.gif

biggrin.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
imipak
post Sep 21 2006, 07:25 PM
Post #15


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 646
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



QUOTE (Bobby @ Sep 21 2006, 05:02 PM) *
I think all the features should be named for all the diehards in both forums who talk about The Rovers and their Journeys and Discoveries. It would be great to honor us all. biggrin.gif

Just imagine seeing Tesheiner Ridge, fredk outlook, Horton's viewpoint, Stu Ripples down at the bottom, Doug's overhang or jamescanvin Coffee Stop at Beacon??? LOL


I'm with you on that Bobby! Also, I seem to remember after Stu pointed out the interesting south-west bays, some possible gullies, interesting overhangs and some other features, that someone else suggested at least one being named "Stu's inlets" (or ramps, bays, whatever they were being referred to at the time.) Can't find the post though... this was a quite a few months back, IIRC.

IMO A1, B1 etc are (a) very dull, (cool.gif entirely arbitrary ( c) forgettable (d) no fun! smile.gif These are "informal" names after all, it's not as if it really means anything except here on UMSF, for the next few days/weeks until we learn the official names. Also, a semi-objective way to allocate names would be by total number of posts... eg. on the route map thread, that gives us the following candidate names:

Tesheiner
djellison
dilo
Bill Harris
Sunspot
Phil Stooke
RNeuhaus
CosmicRocker
Pando
dot.dk
jamescanvin
climber
Shaka
gregp1962
alan
ElkGroveDan
mhoward
Bob Shaw
Toma B
algorimancer
OWW
SigurRosFan
paxdan
ustrax
dvandorn
ToSeek
lyford
Nirgal
TheChemist
marswiggle
hortonheardawho
[... etc ..]

...which would all look good with 'Cape' or 'Bay' after them.


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

6 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 07:52 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.