IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
USGS Cloud Processing: strange results
Yadgar
post Apr 2 2015, 09:37 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: 6-April 11
From: Cologne, Germany
Member No.: 5951



Hi(gh)!

A new attempt at getting a simple cylindrical elevation bitmap of Vesta suitable for generating a mesh2 with POV-Ray...

Whenever I try the USGS cloud processing of file Vesta_Dawn_HAMO_DTM_DLR_Global_48ppd.cub, I only get a ridiculously small zip file (only a few kilobytes!) containing either a strange XML description or a tiny little bitmap about 10 by 5 pixels... what do I wrong?

I first click the blue "Process button", then log in, then choose options as following:

Name or Label/Job Name: Dawn HAMO DTM Global 93mp: Apr 2, 2015
Name or Label/Job Description: PNG conversion of Dawn HAMO DTM of Vesta
Image Options/Single Band Image: yes
Image Options/Output Resolution (meters/pixel): 92.72061651 (default)
Projection/Projection: Input Projection
Projection/Extents/Max Latitude: 90
Projection/Extents/Min Longitude: 0
Projection/Extents/Max Longitude: 360
Projection/Extents/Min Latitude: -90
Download File Format/PNG, 8 bit (for the time being - later on I would also try out GEOTiff)
Download File Format/Percent Stretch/Minimum: 0
Download File Format/Percent Stretch/Maximum: 100
Download File Format/Graticule, Grid Lines: No Grid

Then I click on the blue "Add Job" button and wait about 5 to 10 minutes...

...this time (!) it almost worked well (possibly because I chose "Input Projection" rather than "Simple Cylindrical"), I in fact got a zip file of about 6.5 MB, containing a huge greyscale PNG of 17280 bx 8641 pixels... but...

...right through the center, from pole to pole runs a white gap, 17 to 18 pixels wide. As fixing this manually would be a no-go, I ask you now what I can do to get rid of this... could it be because of the non-default stretching?

See you in Khyberspace!

Yadgar
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
thare
post Apr 3 2015, 07:30 PM
Post #2


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 27-February 08
Member No.: 4059



Yadgar,
We just happened to notice this post. Please also feel free to send us an email to alert us of a potential issue. Our support email for POW and MAP2 is "astroweb at usgs.gov".

Looking at your job, we realized we had an incorrect radius set for Vesta. This value is within our internal database (not the original image), so that we can generate products using the latest recommended IAU-approved radius values. The problem was simply that the radius was defined in kilometers when it should have been set in meters. Which is why your images were coming out so tiny. We updated the radius in our database to meters and re-ran a new Vesta job. It appears to be in good working order now.

Here is the test run using the corrected radius value (8bit PNG of the original DEM):
http://astrocloud.wr.usgs.gov/index.php?vi...8822b75ff5258de
Note these are temporary files and will be deleted in a couple weeks. But feel free to run the job over yourself. In the job parameters below you can see what I set.

Regards,
Trent

CODE
<OutputOptions>
<OutputMapping>
<Target>
<TargetName>VESTA</TargetName>
<EquatorialRadius>255000</EquatorialRadius>
<PolarRadius>255000</PolarRadius>
</Target>
<Projection>
<ProjName>INPUT</ProjName>
</Projection>
</OutputMapping>
<OutputGeometry>
<extents>
<MaxLatitude>90</MaxLatitude>
<MinLatitude>-90</MinLatitude>
<MaxLongitude>180</MaxLongitude>
<MinLongitude>-180</MinLongitude>
</extents>
</OutputGeometry>
<OutputResolution>92.72061651</OutputResolution>
<OutputType>
<Format>PNG</Format>
<BitType>unsignedbyte</BitType>
</OutputType>
<OutputGIS>true</OutputGIS>
</OutputOptions>
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Yadgar
post Apr 3 2015, 10:43 PM
Post #3


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: 6-April 11
From: Cologne, Germany
Member No.: 5951



Hi(gh)!

Meanwhile, I managed to generate and download a GeoTIFF file from Dawn's Vesta HAMO DTM .cub file (while I also started to manually fill in the white vertical gap in the 8bit PNG version of these data - but it's cumbersome work)... but as I tried to display this resulting file in 3DEM in order to generate an ASCII elevation matrix (which in turn would be processible by POV-Ray), I only got a "File Error".

What software to fulfil this task would you recommend instead?

See you in Khyberspace!

Yadgar
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Apr 3 2015, 11:07 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



Hi Yadgar,

Others more knowledgable will have to help you find the best program. Unmannedspaceflight threads usually go for tens to hundred to thousands of entries. So please don't start a new thread after one response to the last thread you started on same topic.

ADMIN NOTE: Agreed. Two topics merged. Please do not unnecessarily start threads.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JohnVV
post Apr 5 2015, 06:39 AM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 890
Joined: 18-November 08
Member No.: 4489



Where did you get the file "Dawn_HAMO_DTM_DLR_Global_48ppd.cub"
i use this
http://dawndata.igpp.ucla.edu/tw.jsp?secti...UDIA_2013_02_13
VEST64_DTM.raw from Qview after running "maplab" on it
Attached Image

this is 570 Meg cub file

there is a cub file
http://dawndata.igpp.ucla.edu/tw.jsp?secti...Ms/DLR_HAMO_DTM

QUOTE
What software to fulfil this task would you recommend instead?

Blender 2.73a

i then wrote a custom lbl file and used ValterVB's blender ad on
http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Extensio...SA_IMG_Importer
you might want to read the last post on the Blender artists thread
http://blenderartists.org/forum/showthread...06-25%29/page10


see my post on the "celestialmatters forum"
http://forum.celestialmatters.org/viewtopi...p?f=4&t=682

i have a 8ppd resolution 3d mesh in obj format UV mapped

BUT it is 480 Meg


what help do you need ?

there are a few steps needed to import a dem into blender AS a 3d spherical object
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 04:35 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.