IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
LauncherOne, proposed new microsat launcher
imipak
post Feb 19 2009, 01:56 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 646
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



The Register has a story linking to a Flight International piece describing a proposed new microsat launcher for payloads up to 200kg. The concept is something like a Pegasus stage, launched from the White Knight Two Virgin / Scaled Composites mothership. I can't help speculating about the cost of a nanosat launch via this method...


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Feb 19 2009, 02:53 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



SSTL have already been on record about the ability to get a high res orbing asset built and launched for <$5M - which would be remarkable.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7862827.stm

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Feb 19 2009, 03:09 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



The key quote from the BBC article is that the launch cost target was $1 M dollars:
"What we are targeting is to see if we can do this for a million dollars"


For perspective, the Cosmos 1 satellite had a mass of 100 kg.


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Feb 20 2009, 01:18 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



Just for comparison, I see the Falcon 1e is a bit over 1,000 kg to LEO for a bit under $10M.

http://spacex.com/falcon1.php

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
qraal
post Feb 22 2009, 05:44 AM
Post #5


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 57
Joined: 13-February 06
From: Brisbane, Australia
Member No.: 679



200 kg at $1 M is $5,000/kg which is CHEAP for a small-sat launcher. Would be nice to see them rattle the space access cage a bit by demonstrating a rapid turn-around or readiness potential for their proposed system. The USAF has been chasing rapid deployment for years and is still not getting any joy from the current launch service providers.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 11:31 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.