IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

24 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > »   
Closed TopicStart new topic
Sol 22 and after, Digging in Wonderland
MahFL
post Jun 25 2008, 10:26 AM
Post #91


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



The surface is definitely not as flat as everyone seems to think it would have been, which is nice really.....

Also I forgot how flat Miridiani is !! flat flat flat.........
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jun 25 2008, 03:41 PM
Post #92


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Stu @ Jun 25 2008, 07:53 AM) *
I'm still intrigued by that bright "patch" in the foreground, which no-one commented on when I pointed it out the first time...

They are interesting, but I'd be more intrigued if the light patches had a different hue from the rest of the soil, and the hues look similar to me...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jun 25 2008, 03:54 PM
Post #93


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Sol 29 color:


From what I can tell, there is zero change in the righmost trench with that grayish stuff.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
imipak
post Jun 25 2008, 07:27 PM
Post #94


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 646
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



QUOTE (MahFL @ Jun 25 2008, 11:26 AM) *
The surface is definitely not as flat as everyone seems to think..


*cough* Not quite everyone... I wouldn't mention it if it weren't so rare for me to be right about something wink.gif

Edit - both Stu's anaglyphs and the official SSI animation of the workspace show lots of vertical relief on the 10s of cm scale.


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jun 26 2008, 07:59 PM
Post #95


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



So... when are we going to start seeing some *deep* trenching?

I'd think that we'd need to first remove the upper regolith from a reasonably large patch and then start working on digging directly into the ice substrate. If we ever want to get ice samples into TEGA and WCL, we'll need to be working directly in the ice layer, I would think.

So far, I've not seen anything deeper than down to the very top of the ice layer -- we hit it and then we go off to the side. I grant you, it may not be easy to dig through the ice layer, but from the looks of things (and someone correct me if I'm wrong), it doesn't look like we have yet even tried.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jun 26 2008, 08:07 PM
Post #96


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



This question's been asked in press briefings. There's no intention to dig deeply into ice -- the deep digging discussed in the mission planning was to get to the ice, not into it. Digging now will be to expose the ice table, examine its contours, see what happens as it goes toward the polygon boundaries. They'll rasp into it to get samples but my understanding is that they don't plan to try to get deeply into its interior -- if I understand correctly, they won't get more than a few millimeters into it.

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Jun 26 2008, 09:38 PM
Post #97


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



They seem to be confident of being able to get some ice into the most accessible TEGA ovens - the end ones - before it sublimes away. That's an admirable goal but I think achieving it may not be at all straightforward. I say go for it and good luck!

What about the chances of delivering ice to the other instruments - any thoughts?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 26 2008, 09:42 PM
Post #98


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



TEGA is really the main instrument for ice. Ice in the WCL, for instance, wouldn't tell them much at all since it's just adding water to water. They'd definitely have to work fast to catch some in the microscope, but it'd be worth a try IMO.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ahecht
post Jun 26 2008, 09:48 PM
Post #99


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 40
Joined: 27-May 08
Member No.: 4145



Apparently the RAC has a macro mode:


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 26 2008, 10:04 PM
Post #100


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (ahecht @ Jun 26 2008, 10:48 PM) *
Apparently the RAC has a macro mode:


That's sort of the point of it - adjustable focus to fully image the contents of the scoop.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
01101001
post Jun 26 2008, 11:53 PM
Post #101


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 101
Joined: 29-January 06
Member No.: 667



What is this nicely machined part, the cylinder lower right, imaged about a dozen times on Sol 30?



Just noticed there must be at least two of them pictured, for they were taken by the SSI, azimuth 305 and 167.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Airbag
post Jun 27 2008, 12:04 AM
Post #102


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 408
Joined: 3-August 05
Member No.: 453



A sol 29/31 comparison (using ugordan's sol 29 image shown above as a reference)

Attached Image


Possible light layer seen in the far "wall"; the dark layers may be some shadow effects (low Sun angle) from a couple of rough ledges. Also some more shallow excavations and/or and impression of the scoop - see the "vertical" lines pattern. The "normal" pattern appears to be the "washboard road" horizontal ridges produced by the scoop "chattering" (?) over the harder underlying surface (or maybe showing the resolution of the steps in scoop's control?).

No more white layers, and some new dark splodges that seem to bear no obvious relationship to either the light or dark ones from sol 29, but maybe associated with the sol 29 white layer?

Airbag
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post Jun 27 2008, 03:02 AM
Post #103


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



This is only speculation right now, but since in wonderland we dont see the bright material that we see in the dodo-goldilocks trench and the arm struck a solid surface in the wonderland trench, could we be seeing a higher ratio of soil to ice in wonderland?. Could that explain those dark sploches?.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hortonheardawho
post Jun 27 2008, 05:45 AM
Post #104


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 133
Joined: 3-June 06
From: the jungle of Nool
Member No.: 799



sol 8 - 31 comparison of lander leg:



Yikes!

Full frame comparison here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James Sorenson
post Jun 27 2008, 06:17 AM
Post #105


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 691
Joined: 21-December 07
From: Clatskanie, Oregon
Member No.: 3988



WOW! that is interesting indeed smile.gif . Any possibility's that the legs were covered by dust on landing, and wind is slowly blowing it off?. looks like ice to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

24 Pages V  « < 5 6 7 8 9 > » 
Closed TopicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th April 2024 - 07:57 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.