IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

TNOs: could some have formed elsewhere?
elakdawalla
post Mar 28 2006, 05:35 PM
Post #1


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



I got a question today for Planetary Radio Q&A that I couldn't answer, being pretty ignorant about solar system formation research. Can anybody help?

QUOTE
We know from the metal composition of our solar system that the Sun is at least a second or third generation star. It made me wonder if it was possible that some of the comets or other KBOs that we witness might be from the Sun's predecessor star or stars. If not, could such bodies exist a bit further out? I should think it would be fantastic to be able to investigate such objects.


--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
ngunn
post May 16 2006, 12:47 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



I saw that, and I can see why the probability of a solitary object getting captured by the sun is virtually nil, but I'm not convinced that it's true if there is a significant population of dark, loosely-bound multiple systems floating about. Nobody knows whether or not there are, and if so how common, so I don't think we're in a position to calculate odds.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 16 2006, 01:05 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (ngunn @ May 16 2006, 01:47 PM) *
I saw that, and I can see why the probability of a solitary object getting captured by the sun is virtually nil, but I'm not convinced that it's true if there is a significant population of dark, loosely-bound multiple systems floating about. Nobody knows whether or not there are, and if so how common, so I don't think we're in a position to calculate odds.

Somehow, I get the feeling that this binary capture scenario only works well when there's an appreciable gravity gradient across the binary object separation distance. Alternatively, you could state this as the two-body distance being not too small compared to the large 3rd body distance. How does this apply to the KBOs and OC? These are so far away from sun, that two components in a binary system would need to be very, very separated for this capture scenario to be feasible. At tens and hundreds of AU from the sun, both objects are likely to feel effectively the same amount of gravitational pull from the sun, with the net effect being virtually no disrupting force upon the binary pair.

I agree we can't know how many binary objects there are that wander around the interstellar space, but even if there are many (not likely), furthermore ones that are very loosely bound (even less likely), IMHO the Triton-like capture mechanism would be highly improbable. I'd be interested to hear if more knowledgeable people know more about this -- Alan et. al. ?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post May 16 2006, 01:47 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (ugordan @ May 16 2006, 02:05 PM) *
I'd be interested to hear if more knowledgeable people know more about this -- Alan et. al. ?


Me too! I was only speculating, not calculating. Relative velocity's important too. I'm guessing that for maximum disruption you would want the dark binary to be in the vicinity of the sun for about half of it's own mutual revolution period. Experts please come in! Computer simulations??
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- elakdawalla   TNOs: could some have formed elsewhere?   Mar 28 2006, 05:35 PM
- - AlexBlackwell   QUOTE (elakdawalla @ Mar 28 2006, 05:35 P...   Mar 28 2006, 05:57 PM
|- - Alan Stern   Hi Emily, I personally have worked on this proble...   Mar 28 2006, 06:19 PM
|- - AlexBlackwell   QUOTE (Alan Stern @ Mar 28 2006, 06:19 PM...   Mar 28 2006, 06:38 PM
||- - Stephen   QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 28 2006, 06:38...   Mar 29 2006, 01:19 AM
|- - SFJCody   QUOTE (Alan Stern @ Mar 28 2006, 07:19 PM...   Mar 28 2006, 07:45 PM
|- - Alan Stern   QUOTE (SFJCody @ Mar 28 2006, 07:45 PM) C...   Mar 28 2006, 10:52 PM
- - elakdawalla   Thanks, Alan, Alex! Emily   Mar 28 2006, 06:55 PM
- - ngunn   Another angle on Emily's query. The recent pa...   May 16 2006, 11:21 AM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (ngunn @ May 16 2006, 12:21 PM) The...   May 16 2006, 11:29 AM
- - ngunn   I saw that, and I can see why the probability of a...   May 16 2006, 12:47 PM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (ngunn @ May 16 2006, 01:47 PM) I s...   May 16 2006, 01:05 PM
|- - ngunn   QUOTE (ugordan @ May 16 2006, 02:05 PM) I...   May 16 2006, 01:47 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   What about a close (in interstellar terms) encount...   May 16 2006, 05:27 PM
- - Richard Trigaux   Well, such interstellar interactions and captures ...   May 16 2006, 07:56 PM
- - ngunn   It's all too easy to picture the sun's ste...   May 17 2006, 09:37 AM
|- - The Messenger   QUOTE (ngunn @ May 17 2006, 03:37 AM) It...   May 17 2006, 05:17 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   Two populations of objects sharing the same space?...   May 17 2006, 07:57 PM
- - Richard Trigaux   Eventually if the solar system had crossed a zone ...   May 17 2006, 02:20 PM
- - ngunn   Indeed, and I like your multiple disc idea too. W...   May 17 2006, 03:22 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   Hopefully, future astrometry missions will provide...   May 17 2006, 04:22 PM
|- - Richard Trigaux   QUOTE (ngunn @ May 17 2006, 03:22 PM) Ind...   May 17 2006, 05:15 PM
- - BruceMoomaw   The most interesting part of Michael Brown's i...   May 18 2006, 06:23 AM
- - ngunn   A marvellous quote, Bruce, music to my ears. It...   May 18 2006, 09:12 AM
|- - Rob Pinnegar   QUOTE (ngunn @ May 18 2006, 03:12 AM) Not...   May 19 2006, 06:02 PM
- - Richard Trigaux   Eventually Sedna is the best candidate for a body ...   May 18 2006, 10:50 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ May 18 2006, 11...   May 18 2006, 11:17 AM
- - dvandorn   'Is not' is not 'not is'... -the ...   May 19 2006, 05:21 AM
- - dvandorn   Not looking for the unexpected is a slippery slope...   May 20 2006, 05:02 PM
- - ngunn   My comment was about astronomy, as in studying cel...   May 20 2006, 08:25 PM
- - ljk4-1   Astrophysics, abstract astro-ph/0605745 From: Da...   Jun 1 2006, 04:04 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 1st May 2024 - 10:07 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.