IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

9 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
UMSF space history photo of the month
Paolo
post May 4 2008, 10:25 AM
Post #61


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



Mariner 5 during ground tests (radiooccultation antenna calibration, I think)

http://i43.servimg.com/u/f43/11/13/59/33/marine10.jpg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post May 4 2008, 11:15 PM
Post #62


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Does anyone recall whether or not Mariner 5 flew with the same solar wind vanes that Mariner 4 sported? I seem to recall the experiment had very minimal effect on Mariner 4, but Mariner 5 was flying into an area of increased solar wind density. Just wondering if they tried it -- especially since it's pretty obvious in the preceding image that the attach points for the vanes are certainly still there.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
edstrick
post May 5 2008, 01:43 AM
Post #63


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



The vanes were light-sail vanes, they were essentially an engineering experiment.

As I understand, shiny bright metal surfaces get about 10 times the light-sail pressure as solar-wind particle pressure... (somebody correct me if I'm wrong)

My poorly documented understanding is that the vanes were ment to auto-adjust somehow the off-center solar pressure on the not-quite-symmetric spacecraft and so null out light pressure induced attitude drift, thus reducing use of attitude control gas. The vanes apparently were "sticky" and didn't adjust properly and didn't yield the expected benefit.

THEY WERE NOT CARRIED ON MARINER 5.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post May 5 2008, 02:12 PM
Post #64





Guests






correct, see the rightside picture ontop of page 4 of this topic
the other Phil (waiting for my flight to Phoenix AZ & browsing UMSF) smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Jun 3 2008, 03:49 PM
Post #65





Guests






1971: Mariner IX to Mars
The 998 kg (launch weight) (565 kg in orbit) Mariner IX was launched to the red planet Mars on 30th May 1971 and reached the planet on 13th November 1971 becoming the first spacecraft to orbit another planet! Mariner 9’s arrival in orbit was greeted by a planet-wide duststorm, but the orbiter sat out the storm and started to map the planet. In January 1972, the first sections of the 4000 km long & 100 km wide Vallis Marineris rift valley were photographed. The ‘discovery’ of these geological features transformed our view of Mars and scientists regained a strong intrest for the red planet as it could be the place that once harboured life. Mariner 9 performed 698 revolutions during 350 Earth days of operation. After 7330 photos, the mission was over and Mariner 9’s orbit was believed to be stable for half a century, satisfying international planetary quarantine requirements…
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Jul 6 2008, 11:54 AM
Post #66





Guests






Well, after Mariner IX comes Mariner X

The 503 kg Mariner 10 spacecraft, launched on 3rd November 1973, was the first to make use of an interplanetary gravitational sling-shot maneuver, using the planet Venus to bend its flight path and bring its perihelion (point closest to the Sun) down to the first rock from the Sun, planet Mercury's orbit. Venus flyby occurred in February 1974 and Mariner 10 flew by Mercury in March + September 1974 and later in March 1975…
Mariner 10 completed one of the most successful planetary explorations: 4 encounters in 13 months!

The other Philip
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Jul 6 2008, 12:00 PM
Post #67


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



That picture in very high resolution, plus others of Mariner 10 can be found here:
http://images.ksc.nasa.gov/photos/1973/cap...C-73P-0539.html
http://images.ksc.nasa.gov/photos/1973/cap...C-73P-0541.html
http://images.ksc.nasa.gov/photos/1973/cap...C-73P-0542.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Jul 6 2008, 03:16 PM
Post #68


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1729
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



From a contemporary magazine, I have scanned and put on my website http://utenti.lycos.it/paoloulivi/pioneer1.html a sequence of images of the launch of Pioneer 1 in 1958
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Aug 1 2008, 06:05 AM
Post #69





Guests






Well, after last month's failure to come up with a 'rare' photograph, I had to do better on Mariner 10: Here's an artist impression of the September 1974 Mercury flyby smile.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Aug 26 2008, 05:35 PM
Post #70





Guests






As a follow-on of the Mariner series, Pioneer F/G were built...
The 260 kg spin-stabilised Pioneer 10 spacecraft established a historic triumph of science and engineering by setting unprecedented flight records. Pioneer 10 not only became the first spacecraft to pass beyond the orbit of Mars, cross the asteroid belt and travel to Jupiter but also became the first spacecraft to leave the solar system and head into interstellar space.

See the Pioneer topics for more info smile.gif


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Sep 8 2008, 10:24 AM
Post #71





Guests






As I already posted the Pioneer 10 photo for September 08, I wanted this time to point out an interesting Blog entry of a guy who found an old NASA-JPL trailer on a dusty lot of grand between Los Angeles & Las Vegas: great " retro space-tech " photos!

http://thisisharrington.com/projects/nasa/index.html
cool.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 8 2008, 11:31 AM
Post #72


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (PhilCo126 @ Sep 8 2008, 11:24 AM) *
an old NASA-JPL trailer on a dusty lot


Untrue
http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2008/08/...yone_missi.html

Specifically
"This story is completely misleading. I have been in this trailer myself. It is on the grounds of the Owens Valley Radio Observatory, operated by the California Institute of Technology. It is used to control a small radio antenna nearby, and is NOT abandoned."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 8 2008, 12:02 PM
Post #73


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Indeed. And as for "retro space-tech" it looks a lot more modern than many bits of radio telescope hardware I've seen, much of it still in use!


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_PhilCo126_*
post Sep 8 2008, 05:17 PM
Post #74





Guests






O.K. guys... this means I gave to come up with some real " Retro " Space Technology huh.gif
What about this IBM 7090 as used by NASA Ames Research and NASA-JPL in the 1960s:

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lyford
post Sep 8 2008, 09:28 PM
Post #75


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1281
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



That is so.... beautiful! *sniff* *sniff* I must have something in my eye.... biggrin.gif


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

9 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 10:35 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.