BepiColombo Launch & Cruise Phase |
BepiColombo Launch & Cruise Phase |
Oct 2 2021, 07:03 PM
Post
#46
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 754 Joined: 9-February 07 Member No.: 1700 |
Astounding how precisely successful this maneuver appears! Question: how close did the actual flyby match the calculations in terms of effect on the spacecraft's speed and course? Or was there a ballpark/range predicted based on how precisely we know Mercury's mass and orbit?
|
|
|
Oct 2 2021, 07:19 PM
Post
#47
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10164 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
JRehling: "At global resolution, Messenger has given us a complete map of Mercury that leaves little to improve upon. However, BepiColombo will nonetheless perform a great deal of original science"
Messenger certainly gave excellent results, but there is much that can be improved on. Messenger had an orbit which gave low passes over the north pole and high passes over the south, so imaging and all datasets were better in the north than in the south. As an example, the laser altimeter was unable to collect data over much of the southern hemisphere, so the global topo map is less accurate in the south where only stereoscopic imaging is available (stereo gives great detail but it needs altimetry to determine the location in space of the stereo model). BepiColombo will improve on many of Messenger;s datasets in the south. And the high resolution imager will greatly extend the limited high resolution mapping by Messenger. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Oct 3 2021, 06:28 AM
Post
#48
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 28-October 12 Member No.: 6732 |
JAXA's flyby webcast and ESA Operations tweets reminded me how cool it would have been if we had got, among others, real-time temperature readings through ESA's BepiColombo Quick-Look Analysis web interface during the flyby, but alas!
|
|
|
Oct 3 2021, 06:14 PM
Post
#49
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 127 Joined: 15-April 21 Member No.: 9009 |
JRehling: "At global resolution, Messenger has given us a complete map of Mercury that leaves little to improve upon. However, BepiColombo will nonetheless perform a great deal of original science" Messenger certainly gave excellent results, but there is much that can be improved on. Messenger had an orbit which gave low passes over the north pole and high passes over the south, so imaging and all datasets were better in the north than in the south. As an example, the laser altimeter was unable to collect data over much of the southern hemisphere, so the global topo map is less accurate in the south where only stereoscopic imaging is available (stereo gives great detail but it needs altimetry to determine the location in space of the stereo model). BepiColombo will improve on many of Messenger;s datasets in the south. And the high resolution imager will greatly extend the limited high resolution mapping by Messenger. Phil did any of the images from the flyby image the south at all? |
|
|
Oct 3 2021, 10:55 PM
Post
#50
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
did any of the images from the flyby image the south at all? Not better than this: https://astrogeology.usgs.gov/search/map/Me...aic_Global_166m |
|
|
Oct 4 2021, 03:54 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2086 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Video including some more distant departure views (overexposed, but still neat!)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdOLeGeqAEI |
|
|
Jan 12 2022, 04:40 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 28-October 12 Member No.: 6732 |
It seems BepiColombo experienced a Safe Mode event sometimes during Christmas holidays between 23.12.2021 and 05.01.2022 (no pass was scheduled during this period). So far all we know is that a "Safe Mode recovery extra pass" was requested on 05.01 and carried out on 07.01.2022.
|
|
|
Jan 12 2022, 09:44 PM
Post
#53
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2086 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Nothing new on their social media, either. Must have been very minor.
|
|
|
Jan 13 2022, 02:07 PM
Post
#54
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 28-October 12 Member No.: 6732 |
Nothing new on their social media... Not too surprising, ESA so far has shown no intention to provide the general public with timely updates on BepiColombo spacecraft operations and status, besides PR coverage of flybys. Having said that, in this article summing up the first 2.5 years (until May 2021) of flight operations we learn that up to this point, BepiColombo experienced only three unplanned safe modes, all in the first few months of the expedition, so at least in this regard a safe mode would be a notable event. |
|
|
Jan 23 2022, 07:11 AM
Post
#55
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 28-October 12 Member No.: 6732 |
BepiColombo is going to enter superior solar conjunction (SSC), and so starts the second observation session for the BepiColombo Solar Conjunction Experiment (SCE) to test General Relativity (GR).
|
|
|
Feb 2 2022, 02:10 PM
Post
#56
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 28-October 12 Member No.: 6732 |
A strange dark streak with greyish "halo" appeared on BepiColombo's High-Gain Antenna (HGA). Unfortunately, the front side of the HGA is rarely imaged by the MCAM3 monitoring camera. In an image taken on 09 Aug 2019 and earlier images everything is fine; then, however, in an oblique view taken on 18 Oct 2020 a dark spot can be seen tentatively at the edge of the HGA dish, the same spot and entire streak is clearly visible on the next image taken on 07 Apr 2021. The dark streak together with the greyish background doesn't seem to change over time when comparing with the most recent available image taken on 09 Dec 2021. Because of thermal control reasons great care was taken in the development and testing of the NV14 ceramic white coating of the HGA and thus coating deterioration by contamination/irradiation processes is unlikely, I think.
|
|
|
Feb 2 2022, 07:50 PM
Post
#57
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 905 Joined: 15-June 09 From: Lisbon, Portugal Member No.: 4824 |
A strange dark streak with greyish "halo" ... This is an interesting information. Can you please check what is causing the error "https://archives.esac.esa.int/psa/APP/connector/0/4291/url/cam_raw_sc_cam3_browse_20210809t223002_61_f__t0005.jpeg" cannot be displayed because it contains errors." in all but the third link? Thanks. Fernando |
|
|
Feb 2 2022, 08:14 PM
Post
#58
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 239 Joined: 28-October 12 Member No.: 6732 |
... cannot be displayed because it contains errors. OK, that's funny?!?! The image links have changed and will probably keep changing (very useful). Please, try this direct link to the MCAM instrument archive and search with the image identifiers, e.g. 20210809t223002_61_f__t0005. Below I have attached the most crucial images taken on 2021-12-09, 2021-08-09, 2020-10-18, 2021-04-07 and for better comparison an additional image from 2019-05-14 respectively. |
|
|
Feb 2 2022, 11:32 PM
Post
#59
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 233 Joined: 14-January 22 Member No.: 9140 |
Perhaps a coincidence, but the streak has a similar size and shape (but not location) to the shadow that some of the antenna gear is casting in some of those photos.
|
|
|
Feb 3 2022, 12:43 AM
Post
#60
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 905 Joined: 15-June 09 From: Lisbon, Portugal Member No.: 4824 |
Thanks for the tip.
I found it best to set the number of images per page to a high number(500?) and search for just this part of the image label "20210809t223002_61_f__t0005". Fernando |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2024 - 01:46 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |