retired non-optical telescopes put to use as optical telescopes? |
retired non-optical telescopes put to use as optical telescopes? |
Feb 29 2008, 04:31 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 31-October 06 Member No.: 1305 |
I am wondering.
When space based telescopes like IR telescopes, ones used for astrometry, or planet hunting end their mission lifespan or use up mission critical expendables likes coolant, can they be converted to be used as regular optical telescopes? Telescopes like Spitzer and Kepler still have mirrors and regular CCD cameras right? |
|
|
Feb 29 2008, 04:47 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
I kind of doubt that they have "regular" (i.e., visible-light-sensitive) CCDs, at least with respect to IR instruments. Not sure about UV devices, but I think that they're a lot more tolerant of higher temps. IR detectors use all sorts of exotic materials that generally have to be kept at cryogenic temperatures to function.
Think the problem is that the detectors for non-visible band instruments are mounted permanently in the scope's focal plane, so there's no way to get them out of the way, nor any sensors onboard that could interpret visible light. Might be cool for a future scope to have a rotable focal plane that could present another set of sensors for use once the primary mission's exhausted, but of course the other limiting factors such as attitude control consumables, gyro/inertia wheel longevity, etc. must be considered before deciding to invest in such a potential extended mission before launch...to say nothing of the anticipated returns of such an effort. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Feb 29 2008, 05:05 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Designs can be quite dissimilar. Chandra, for example, has "mirrors" that resemble concentric tubes which funnel X-rays to the detector. Nothing like a focusing mirror set or a CCD array in that baby.
-the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Feb 29 2008, 05:44 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 87 Joined: 9-November 07 Member No.: 3958 |
Something of the sort happened when WIRE's cryogens were lost before beginning its prime IR mission - a few clever folks realized that there was interesting work in asteroseismology and exoplanet transits to be done with the CCD on its star-tracker, originally intended for attitude determination. Being in such a stable environment lets you start out at precision levels which are very difficult to get from the ground and imprpve matters from there. For this to be an option, you need something to happen which ends the primary mission but leaves attitude control, power, and telemetry. The "Warm Spitzer" mission almost qualifies, continuing use of the two shortest-wavelength camera modes once cryogens are depleted (coming up this year, alas). ISO continued work a bit after cryogen depletion, doing a near-IR spectral atlas of bright stars. As best I can recall, IRAS and maybe ISO were used to train ground controllers on live but otherwise useless spacecraft for a while after end of mission.
|
|
|
Feb 29 2008, 09:09 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 10-December 06 From: Atlanta Member No.: 1472 |
AKARI (Astro-F), JAXA's IR telescope has this capability. During its primary mission, it surveys the sky in IR 2-180 um until its liquid helium reserve runs out, then it works as a near IR telescope using "mechanical cooling":
http://www.ir.isas.jaxa.jp/AKARI/Outreach/unyou_e.html |
|
|
Feb 29 2008, 11:23 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 213 Joined: 21-January 07 From: Wigan, England Member No.: 1638 |
Designs can be quite dissimilar. Chandra, for example, has "mirrors" that resemble concentric tubes which funnel X-rays to the detector. Nothing like a focusing mirror set or a CCD array in that baby. On the contrary, Chandra has several CCDs, and they are also sensitive to visible light (optical blocking filters are used to allow only X-ray photons to pass). -------------------- "I got a call from NASA Headquarters wanting a color picture of Venus. I said, “What color would you like it?” - Laurance R. Doyle, former JPL image processing guy
|
|
|
Mar 1 2008, 04:00 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
On the contrary, Chandra has several CCDs, and they are also sensitive to visible light (optical blocking filters are used to allow only X-ray photons to pass). Really? Interesting -- you didn't get that impression from the detailed documentary that ran on NASA-TV six times a day for two months... they referred more to "X-ray detectors," IIRC. Good to know -- thanks, Del! -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Mar 1 2008, 05:05 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 128 Joined: 10-December 06 From: Atlanta Member No.: 1472 |
Based on ACIS website (Chandra's Imagings Spectrometer), it is very sensitive to visible light as well as X-ray, hence the dark mask in front of the CCD:
http://acis.mit.edu/acis/eb-paper/detector.html However, Chandra also has an aspect camera, which works in visible light and is used for fine pointing. In fact, it has been successful in doing science independently: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AAS...211.6003N |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 07:39 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |