IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Google Lunar X Prize
Phil Stooke
post Mar 28 2008, 08:53 PM
Post #1


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10153
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Am I completely out of it, or is there no GLXP thread on here? I couldn't find one. Anyway, things are moving on it, so I thought we ought to have one.

For the record, I just turned down my second invitation to join a team. I'm staying as an interested observer on this - for now, anyway.

There is a forum at the GLXP site as well as team info. There are a lot of people with half-baked ideas of how to go about it. The real professionals are not doing much on the forum, just working behind the scenes.

At LPSC two weeks ago, Bob Richards of Odyssey Moon invited people to propose instruments to carry on their rover - targeted to a pyroclastic deposit, probably Rima Bode or Sulpicius Gallus. And I see they have now signed an agreement to carry Celestis's lunar burials to the Moon. Richards will be here next week, and I'll be spending some time with him.

This whole thing is going to be interesting.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Betelgeuze
post Apr 11 2008, 09:11 PM
Post #2


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 21-December 05
Member No.: 614



Also the moon is so big, why land on a place weve already seen while there are so many exciting things we haven't seen yet?!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Apr 12 2008, 07:28 AM
Post #3


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (Betelgeuze @ Apr 11 2008, 10:11 PM) *
Also the moon is so big, why land on a place weve already seen while there are so many exciting things we haven't seen yet?!


Because somewhere in our DNA there's an urge to see places, people and things that we have heard about, been affected by, and attribute significance to. That's why we have museums like the Smithsonian and Natural History Museum; that's why we have "Pioneer Cabins" to look around; that's why we will drive hundreds or thousands of miles to see sections of Hadrian's Wall, the Oregon Trail tracks, or abandoned launch sites at KSC; that's why we go to art galleries to see famous paintings in person instead of just looking at them on t'internet. Looking at - better still, touching - something "famous" we've heard about makes it more real to us somehow, connects us to it and our own past, too.

I think this was beautifully shown in the Star Trek film FIRST CONTACT, when Picard and Data find the very first warp drive starship, the Phoenix, in Zeffram Cochrane's missile silo. To Data, lacking emotion, lacking a sense of history or occasion, it's just a spacecraft from his databanks... but to Picard, it's THE PHOENIX, the FIRST STARSHIP, the one that opened up the Galaxy to mankind and altered the course of history.

[Picard puts his hand on the Phoenix]

Captain Jean-Luc Picard: It's a boyhood fantasy... I must have seen this ship hundreds of times in the Smithsonian but I was
never able to touch it.

Lieutenant Commander Data: Sir, does tactile contact alter your perception of the Phoenix?

Captain Jean-Luc Picard: Oh, yes! For humans, touch can connect you to an object in a very personal way, make it seem more real.


I know that's just a movie, and it's a fantasy story, but it rings so true, doesn't it? Well, maybe not for everyone here, but for most, I'm sure. I'm certain many people here have visited the Smithsonian or other museums to see hardware from past space missions, because they want to see those pieces of history with their own eyes, and not just on pictures. I'm also sure many people here have waited (im)patiently in their gardens or on their doorsteps to watch the ISS going over on a clear night. Why bother, when the net is full of hi-res pics taken during shuttle missions? Because you can't beat seeing something with your own eyes and establishing a connection with it.

Which is why people want to see images of Apollo hardware now, and will go there to see it in person one day in the future, from a distance, under diamond sheeting, or whatever. Not just to wreck once and for all the arguments of the Moon Conspiracy nutters, but because that will link us to it personally. Right now, Apollo is almost considered "ancient history" by many people, especially kids who - rightly, I think, given the current state of manned space exploration - have a hard time believing we actually went to the Moon in those days of black and white television and funny haircuts. Check out the "Space Exploration" section on Amazon and you'll see one Apollo book after another, page after page of them. It's history, right there with the Victorian Era, Egyptians and Knights and Castles.

So, yes, you're right, there's a lot more of the Moon to see than the Apollo landing sites. I can imagine standing in the shadow of the Straight Wall and watching blazing sunlight slide down it as dawn breaks, or gazing across Copernicus crater from its rim, marvelling at the mountains looming up from its centre... but the Apollo 11 landing site is unique in the history of mankind as being the place where human beings first set foot on another world. In the future there'll be similar "First Landing" sites on Mars, Europa, Proxima Centauri B1 or whatever, and a thousand other worlds, but there'll only ever be one "Tranquility Base". Who wouldn't want to see the footprints of the first human being in history to walk on another planet?

smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Apr 12 2008, 01:13 PM
Post #4


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



QUOTE (Stu @ Apr 12 2008, 12:28 AM) *
In the future there'll be similar "First Landing" sites on Mars, Europa, Proxima Centauri B1 or whatever, and a thousand other worlds, but there'll only ever be one "Tranquility Base". Who wouldn't want to see the footprints of the first human being in history to walk on another planet?


Terrific, very moving post, Stu!

Yeah, I'm more than convinced that nothing & nobody should go near at least the Apollo 11 site--and maybe all the landing sites--except historians and preservationists to set up a proper viewing environment as EGD proposed. These places have the same significance as the unknown locales where our distant ancestors first set foot on the other continents of Earth beyond Africa.

Actually, even more: Neil Armstrong's first step is at the same level as the first step (or drag, or hop, or whatever) of the first ocean creature to venture onto land. It's damn hard to overstate the importance of preserving it.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
imipak
post Apr 12 2008, 02:41 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 646
Joined: 23-December 05
From: Forest of Dean
Member No.: 617



QUOTE (nprev @ Apr 12 2008, 01:13 PM) *
Neil Armstrong's first step is at the same level as the first step (or drag, or hop, or whatever) of the first ocean creature to venture onto land.


I humbly submit that ~500m years gives us a lot of perspective about the significance of animal life leaving the oceans - a lot more than 35 or 40 years gives us on Apollo. In another half a billion years posterity, if there is one, will doubtless thank us for leaving the landing sites as they were when the ascent modules lifted off.

Referring back to Doug's earlier comment about the funds needed for a successful mission being more than the prize money: what options are there for raising additional commercial funding for a GLXP project?

- Planetary Society-style "fly your name to the moon"
- Kaguya-style sponsorship, funded by subscription access to video eye-candy
- straightforward "picture of your corporate logo on the lunar surface" sponsorship

Anyone know any other possibilities? These don't look like they could raise 7 or 8 figure sums sad.gif


--------------------
--
Viva software libre!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Phil Stooke   Google Lunar X Prize   Mar 28 2008, 08:53 PM
- - djellison   I remember discussing it - but it must have been e...   Mar 28 2008, 09:26 PM
- - ugordan   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Mar 28 2008, 09:53 P...   Mar 28 2008, 09:30 PM
- - Phil Stooke   I've been thinking about the Google Lunar X Pr...   Apr 11 2008, 04:38 PM
- - Stu   Excellent post, and excellent work Phil. Preservin...   Apr 11 2008, 06:53 PM
- - Betelgeuze   Also the moon is so big, why land on a place weve ...   Apr 11 2008, 09:11 PM
|- - climber   QUOTE (Betelgeuze @ Apr 11 2008, 11:11 PM...   Apr 11 2008, 09:18 PM
|- - Stu   QUOTE (Betelgeuze @ Apr 11 2008, 10:11 PM...   Apr 12 2008, 07:28 AM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (Stu @ Apr 12 2008, 12:28 AM) In th...   Apr 12 2008, 01:13 PM
|- - imipak   QUOTE (nprev @ Apr 12 2008, 01:13 PM) Nei...   Apr 12 2008, 02:41 PM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (imipak @ Apr 12 2008, 06:41 AM) An...   Apr 12 2008, 07:05 PM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (mcaplinger @ Apr 12 2008, 11:05 AM...   Apr 15 2008, 03:29 AM
- - Betelgeuze   Not sure I understand what you mean with that. Wh...   Apr 11 2008, 11:17 PM
|- - stevesliva   QUOTE (Betelgeuze @ Apr 11 2008, 07:17 PM...   Apr 11 2008, 11:53 PM
- - djellison   There's the whole of antarctica to visit - so ...   Apr 11 2008, 11:30 PM
- - ElkGroveDan   It kind of makes you wonder how in the future such...   Apr 11 2008, 11:38 PM
- - Phil Stooke   An even better reason than 'because it's t...   Apr 11 2008, 11:50 PM
- - Betelgeuze   1969 Is not that long ago (heh and I'm only 21...   Apr 12 2008, 03:36 PM
|- - Stu   QUOTE (Betelgeuze @ Apr 12 2008, 04:36 PM...   Apr 12 2008, 08:32 PM
|- - Betelgeuze   If pictures and movies from 1969 don't inspire...   Apr 12 2008, 10:47 PM
||- - Greg Hullender   QUOTE (Betelgeuze @ Apr 12 2008, 03:47 PM...   Apr 13 2008, 12:10 AM
|||- - Stu   QUOTE (Greg Hullender @ Apr 13 2008, 01:1...   Apr 13 2008, 07:07 AM
|||- - Greg Hullender   QUOTE (Stu @ Apr 12 2008, 11:07 PM) I hav...   Apr 13 2008, 03:25 PM
||- - Stu   QUOTE (Betelgeuze @ Apr 12 2008, 11:47 PM...   Apr 13 2008, 07:28 AM
|- - JRehling   QUOTE (Stu @ Apr 12 2008, 12:32 PM) And t...   Apr 15 2008, 03:41 AM
|- - Greg Hullender   QUOTE (JRehling @ Apr 14 2008, 08:41 PM) ...   Apr 15 2008, 04:55 AM
- - Phil Stooke   I think this is missing the point. Look at Astrob...   Apr 12 2008, 04:13 PM
- - Phil Stooke   It's not about making money - nor was the Ansa...   Apr 12 2008, 08:23 PM
|- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Apr 12 2008, 01:23 P...   Apr 12 2008, 11:12 PM
- - Betelgeuze   I've never been in front of a classroom talkin...   Apr 13 2008, 11:18 AM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (Betelgeuze @ Apr 13 2008, 12:18 PM...   Apr 13 2008, 11:29 AM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (Betelgeuze @ Apr 13 2008, 01:18 PM...   Apr 13 2008, 11:36 AM
|- - Stu   QUOTE (Betelgeuze @ Apr 13 2008, 12:18 PM...   Apr 13 2008, 11:48 AM
- - djellison   If you want to have a slap fight about education -...   Apr 14 2008, 07:04 AM
- - Phil Stooke   I've made a map showing the various places on ...   May 3 2008, 04:57 PM
- - nprev   NOT liking the "Tranquility Trek", Astro...   May 3 2008, 05:06 PM
- - Phil Stooke   The disturbance issue is going to be big, and I...   May 3 2008, 05:18 PM
- - nprev   Glad to hear this, Phil. One other constraint must...   May 3 2008, 05:22 PM
- - Phil Stooke   The landing ellipse issue is very important, and I...   May 3 2008, 05:25 PM
- - nprev   Well, I'd concede that the lack of atmosphere ...   May 3 2008, 05:30 PM
|- - tedstryk   I would agree that I would hate to see an x-prize ...   May 3 2008, 11:05 PM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (tedstryk @ May 3 2008, 04:05 PM) I...   May 4 2008, 03:08 AM
- - Stu   Here's an idea: you disturb ANYTHING at Tranqu...   May 3 2008, 11:06 PM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (Stu @ May 4 2008, 12:06 AM) Or hac...   May 3 2008, 11:29 PM
|- - Stu   QUOTE (djellison @ May 4 2008, 12:29 AM) ...   May 3 2008, 11:37 PM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (djellison @ May 3 2008, 03:29 PM) ...   May 3 2008, 11:44 PM
- - Stu   Here's an interesting tidbit... was quite amaz...   May 3 2008, 11:49 PM
- - Phil Stooke   People who care about the protection of these site...   May 4 2008, 12:10 AM
- - Stu   On the Google Lunar X-Prize website, a YouTube vid...   May 4 2008, 09:38 AM
|- - Astroblogger   QUOTE (Stu @ May 4 2008, 09:38 AM) On the...   Jun 18 2008, 03:22 PM
- - nprev   Yeah...esp. with that little robot-vacuum-cleaner-...   May 4 2008, 12:13 PM
- - Stu   I'm going to make Preserving Tranquility Base ...   May 4 2008, 12:27 PM
- - ilbasso   This article on Space.com discusses how difficult ...   May 5 2008, 02:23 AM
- - nprev   Jeez... ...thanks, ILB! I'm sure that no...   May 5 2008, 10:35 AM
|- - ugordan   QUOTE (nprev @ May 5 2008, 12:35 PM) I...   May 5 2008, 11:57 AM
|- - nprev   QUOTE (ugordan @ May 5 2008, 04:57 AM) Al...   May 5 2008, 12:35 PM
|- - tedstryk   Knowing luck, we will take all sorts of drastic me...   May 5 2008, 12:41 PM
- - Stu   Looks like others feel the same about preserving T...   May 5 2008, 03:33 PM
- - jasedm   I'm 100% behind the principle of preserving th...   May 6 2008, 01:31 PM
- - Stu   Sadly, I'm 100000% certain that you're rig...   May 6 2008, 01:49 PM
|- - imipak   QUOTE (Stu @ May 6 2008, 02:49 PM) But th...   May 6 2008, 07:37 PM
||- - Stu   QUOTE (imipak @ May 6 2008, 08:37 PM) but...   May 6 2008, 09:29 PM
||- - mcaplinger   QUOTE (Stu @ May 6 2008, 02:29 PM) Astrob...   May 6 2008, 11:02 PM
|- - DDAVIS   “To destroy the relics of the past is, even ...   May 10 2008, 09:21 PM
- - Stu   Good point, but it does suggest an element of ...   May 7 2008, 05:27 AM
|- - imipak   Full inline quote removed. - Doug. It does; but i...   May 7 2008, 06:49 PM
- - Phil Stooke   No, imipak, several hundred million dollars is way...   May 7 2008, 07:46 PM
|- - tedstryk   What is the other one?   May 8 2008, 01:16 AM
|- - imipak   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ May 7 2008, 08:46 PM...   May 8 2008, 07:23 PM
- - Phil Stooke   I'm not saying! Can't afford to alien...   May 8 2008, 02:16 AM
- - Phil Stooke   "I still don't see how it can be done wit...   May 8 2008, 07:57 PM
|- - tedstryk   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ May 8 2008, 07:57 PM...   May 8 2008, 08:12 PM
- - nprev   Very good point really in your last, Don. Why the ...   May 10 2008, 11:42 PM
- - Phil Stooke   That is exactly the rationale of Odyssey Moon. Ph...   May 11 2008, 07:55 PM
- - nprev   I wish them luck; seems as if my opinions & th...   May 11 2008, 08:29 PM
- - Betelgeuze   heh nprev thats the point I've been trying to ...   May 11 2008, 10:23 PM
- - nprev   If you're referring to this post, then, yeah, ...   May 11 2008, 10:53 PM
- - dvandorn   Yeah, but... I have this image of Buzz Aldrin, in...   May 12 2008, 12:20 AM
- - nprev   Okay, NOW I have to go get my brain flashburned to...   May 12 2008, 12:26 AM
- - dvandorn   You can always add to that "Poor Neil -- he d...   May 12 2008, 01:45 AM
- - nprev   <removes creaking 386 space-certified processor...   May 12 2008, 01:59 AM
- - Mongo   Here is photographic evidence that the Apollo 11 l...   May 13 2008, 01:35 AM
- - nprev   Hey...nobody saw me, you can't prove anything,...   May 13 2008, 01:52 AM
- - Phil Stooke   Cease this friviolity at once! And now for so...   May 15 2008, 02:22 PM
- - Stu   A terrifying glimpse into the future...? Salvage ...   May 18 2008, 12:25 PM
- - nprev   ...now there's a blast from the past! Than...   May 18 2008, 12:42 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Four new GLXP teams announced, and one new landing...   May 23 2008, 11:41 AM
|- - SFJCody   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ May 23 2008, 12:41 P...   May 23 2008, 04:54 PM
|- - DDAVIS   QUOTE (SFJCody @ May 23 2008, 04:54 PM) M...   May 23 2008, 05:33 PM
- - Phil Stooke   ... and then there were 13. One GLXP team has dro...   May 25 2008, 12:55 AM
- - Stu   Thanks for that, Astroblogger, really appreciate y...   Jun 18 2008, 03:40 PM
- - helvick   One of our favourite PI's gets involved in the...   Jun 18 2008, 08:13 PM
- - Phil Stooke   Thanks for this, Astroblogger. This is a very fla...   Jun 19 2008, 01:10 AM
- - dvandorn   The only thing we need to be reasonably careful of...   Jun 19 2008, 04:43 AM
- - PDP8E   Here is a map of the Apollo 11 site superimposed o...   Jun 20 2008, 03:17 AM
- - Phil Stooke   Using some ideas already discussed here - includin...   Jul 8 2008, 08:53 PM
- - nprev   Looks great, Phil! Very honored by your ack...   Jul 8 2008, 09:22 PM
- - dvandorn   Very nice, Phil! Just one caution (and I know...   Jul 9 2008, 05:58 AM
- - AndyG   Good stuff, Phil. However, I have an issue with th...   Jul 9 2008, 09:01 AM
- - Phil Stooke   I don't suggest tracks or footprints should be...   Jul 9 2008, 11:14 AM
2 Pages V   1 2 >


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th April 2024 - 12:18 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.