IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

40 Pages V  « < 33 34 35 36 37 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Mercury Flyby 1
belleraphon1
post Feb 1 2008, 03:47 AM
Post #511


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 29-December 05
From: NE Oh, USA
Member No.: 627



Thanks nprev! smile.gif

But Stu is the true jewel..... beautiful, sir!

Yes, it appears Mars had an intrinsic magnetic field early on..... and some of the remnant frgaments are fairly strong!

As for Venus... hmmmmm..... the lack of a field cannot be soley due to slow planetary rotation, Mercury's rotation is long as well..... Venus I would also love to dive into...... does she have one thick lithosperic plate over a stagnant mantle and core?
Or are there other complications................ ???

All just so fascinating..... I was born when planets were basically just dots in the sky, litttle known.... and now I can virtually partipate in roving worlds....

Craig
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Feb 1 2008, 08:28 AM
Post #512


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Feb 1 2008, 12:14 PM
Post #513


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



QUOTE (Gladstoner @ Feb 1 2008, 03:28 AM) *
The spider grabens seem to radiate from a dark albedo feature that is offset from the crater.


Nice illustration and observation!


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Feb 1 2008, 02:40 PM
Post #514


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10146
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The spider fracture pattern looks to me like what I would expect from a dome-like uplift - either related to isostatic compensation in the old basin, or later intrusions.

But I'm particularly interested in this feature on the SW edge of Caloris:

Attached Image


a diffuse halo nothing like crater rays or ejecta. The multispectral images show it has a non-impact-like composition, as well. And it has an irregular depression in the middle. To me, it looks like a volcanic plume deposit of some kind.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Feb 1 2008, 03:17 PM
Post #515


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8783
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Nice find, Phil! That is indeed intriguing. Additionally, the thing looks like it's sitting on some sort of darker flow itself, or at least there seems to be a sharp boundary (a scarp?) to the right of the feature.

Can't wait for the orbital phase...bet we find a lot of things like this!


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Feb 1 2008, 08:02 PM
Post #516


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Feb 1 2008, 08:23 PM
Post #517


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Feb 1 2008, 10:16 PM
Post #518


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



QUOTE
The spider fracture pattern looks to me like what I would expect from a dome-like uplift - either related to isostatic compensation in the old basin, or later intrusions.

Bingo. The radial graben are clearly extensional features. The impacting asteroid excavated the basin, and the mobile, plastic mantle overlying the fluid iron core made an isostatic adjustment. I'll suspect that altimetry will show that Caloris isn't a basin...

It'll be interesting to see what the Skinakas Basin has to offer, as well as the Weird Terrain at the antipode of Caloris, etc.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nirgal
post Feb 2 2008, 09:46 AM
Post #519


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



Based on all the superb color reproductions posted here by tedstryk, ugordan, Vikingmars and others
I tried my own (hand-)colorized interpretation of one of the Mercury recent fly-over-limb images...
:-)


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Feb 4 2008, 07:55 AM
Post #520


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Browsing the Planetary Photojournal yesterday, looking for a pic to use in a talk, I found a Magellan image that looked naggingly familiar... then it came to me...

Attached Image


Venus image info: http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA00150

Not suggesting anything, just pointing out a similarity, that's all... Does make you think tho, especially with the speculation here about Caloris actually being Mercury's Tharsis... wink.gif

Edit: Also interesting: Navka


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pgrindrod
post Feb 4 2008, 10:02 AM
Post #521


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 59
Joined: 18-July 07
From: London, UK
Member No.: 2873



stu, i think it could be a very valid similarity! i’ve hunted through some of my own images and found a couple more features on venus that look similar.

Attached Image
Attached Image


there are about 160 on venus, and over half of these have a raised central summit region, showing that uplift might be playing a part in their formation. in fact, you can have some fun inflating a balloon in a box full of flour (sand would probably be better) to show how uplift can cause radial fractures.

Attached Image


but back to mercury…i don’t know how differently magma bodies (if they are the cause) behave inside mercury, but i wasn’t expecting this kind of feature (i was more hopeful for titan, but that doesn’t seem to have borne out). very exciting stuff though. the topography of the area will be very interesting i imagine.

pete
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Feb 4 2008, 01:10 PM
Post #522


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



QUOTE (pgrindrod @ Feb 4 2008, 05:02 AM) *
(i was more hopeful for titan, but that doesn't seem to have borne out).



Actually, I've been wondering if Sotra Facula on Titan might be a Nova - something like Ganesa Macula that bulged up, cracked in a goofy way, then oozed out a ways from the center. The T25 RADAR Swath image (PIA09182) shows bright "cracks" (cliff faces?), but doesnt' quite show the RADAR darker fracture depths you'd expect on a Nova. (Could these be infilled due to Titans erosion and dune sands and harder to see at this RADAR resoultion?)

If it indeed is a Titan version of a Nova, it's fracture pattern seems more random when compared to Venus and Mercury's regular star-crack pattern. Perhaps the goofy fracture pattern on Titan is due to it's different crustal materials?

Attached Image


(Alternatively, the radar bright features might be the steep edges of cryovolcanic flow boundaries.)

((This feature is right at the edge of the T28 Swath and there might be subtle hopeful hints of associated darker cracks, but it's of lower resolution.))

-Mike


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasp
post Feb 4 2008, 03:43 PM
Post #523


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



I suspect a similarity to the "Tiger Scratches" on Iapetus. In that example however, the compressional effect is offset along the flight vector of the impactor into the Iapetan equivalent of mantle. We do not see a 'spider' pattern, in that case, just the released compressional effects of the impacting body under and away from the rim.

Hate to harp about this, but we really do need a good close up set of observations of the Tiger Scratches. Neglecting everything else on Iapetus, the Tiger Scratches themselves, in view of this new Mercury finding, strongly merit additional study.


Amazing feature on Mercury, and one we can learn more about by studyoing additional examples. It is an intersting probe of deep material properties.


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Feb 4 2008, 04:18 PM
Post #524


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



A query - would subsidence produce a similar pattern as doming upward? Both involve extension of the surface. When molten metal cools from the outside in you tend to get dimple formation and tensional cracking in the middle. I'm thinking large 'ball' of molten rock following the Caloris impact, again cooling and shrinking from the outside inward. The last bit to solidify can't fill the available volume, hence subsidence and tensional cracking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Gladstoner
post Feb 4 2008, 09:03 PM
Post #525


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 714
Joined: 3-January 08
Member No.: 3995



.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

40 Pages V  « < 33 34 35 36 37 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 08:21 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.