IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Major Announcement!
ustrax
post Jan 5 2007, 05:52 PM
Post #1


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2149
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



Wait till Monday... wink.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post Jan 5 2007, 06:05 PM
Post #2


Rover Driver
***

Group: Members
Posts: 981
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



QUOTE
The online edition of Nature will publish, on 8 January 2007, a major scientific achievement in astronomy, in which European astronomers have participated, using a space telescope with ESA participation.


wow, all the details (!)
...so it's Hubble I assume, or are there more space telescopes 'with ESA participation'? Can't think of one right now....unless they have results from Corot already biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SigurRosFan
post Jan 5 2007, 06:12 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



QUOTE
... or are there more space telescopes 'with ESA participation'?

SOHO?


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuvas
post Jan 5 2007, 09:26 PM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 428
Joined: 21-August 06
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 1062



Hmmm... This does have me curious. Astronomy itself is rarely my thing, but who knows? It should be interesting...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astrophil
post Jan 5 2007, 09:39 PM
Post #5


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 33
Joined: 13-April 05
Member No.: 232



I wonder if it's a reference to the story reported here:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6231623.stm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 5 2007, 09:45 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3534
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (Astrophil @ Jan 5 2007, 10:39 PM) *
I wonder if it's a reference to the story reported here:

That's what I put my money on.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jan 5 2007, 09:50 PM
Post #7


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5546
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Wow, have we actually found something top secret you don't know about in advance altready tuv?!?!?! wink.gif wink.gif wink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuvas
post Jan 5 2007, 09:55 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 428
Joined: 21-August 06
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 1062



LOL. I only really know HiRISE stuff, and occasionally bits from the other teams, for something I don't know about, just look at the MGS recent discovery.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jan 5 2007, 10:00 PM
Post #9


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5546
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



If it's the black hole story I'll be a bit disappointed. "Major" to me would be COROT discovering its first rocky world, or Hubble imaging Battlestar Galactica powering past Pluto... wink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuvas
post Jan 5 2007, 10:23 PM
Post #10


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 428
Joined: 21-August 06
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 1062



QUOTE (Stu @ Jan 5 2007, 03:00 PM) *
If it's the black hole story I'll be a bit disappointed. "Major" to me would be COROT discovering its first rocky world, or Hubble imaging Battlestar Galactica powering past Pluto... wink.gif


Please do keep in mind who is announcing the discovery... That's all I have to say on that subject.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jan 5 2007, 10:26 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3534
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



It's not like NASA PR doesn't know how to blow up an announcement out of proportion every now and then...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jan 5 2007, 10:26 PM
Post #12


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5546
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (tuvas @ Jan 5 2007, 10:23 PM) *
That's all I have to say on that subject.


Yeah, apart from the crumbs you'll feed us one by one over the weekend until someone leaks it properly... wink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Paolo
post Jan 7 2007, 06:46 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1147
Joined: 3-August 06
From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E
Member No.: 1004



Here it is (far less exciting than I had hoped): First 3D map of the Universe’s Dark Matter
http://television.esa.int/photos/EbS50295.pdf


--------------------
I'm one of the most durable and fervent advocates of space exploration, but my take is that we could do it robotically at far less cost and far greater quantity and quality of results.

James Van Allen
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRehling
post Jan 7 2007, 07:43 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1513
Joined: 20-April 05
Member No.: 321



QUOTE (Paolo @ Jan 7 2007, 10:46 AM) *
Here it is (far less exciting than I had hoped): First 3D map of the Universe’s Dark Matter
http://television.esa.int/photos/EbS50295.pdf


This seems (it is described, not shown!) to simply be a map of the universe's matter, assuming that it coincides with the dark matter, no?

What about dark energy? If it is the prime mover and shaker, would it make sense to opine that a map of the universe is basicaly a map of dark energy, which is NOT co-located with the matter and dark matter?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mongo
post Jan 7 2007, 07:44 PM
Post #15


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 514
Joined: 13-June 04
Member No.: 82



Okaaaay.....

I probably should not be making editorial comments on the existence (or lack of same) of dark matter, but I cannot help but point out that dark matter is still just a hypothesis -- it has never been DIRECTLY detected (or indeed explained by standard physics). The anomalous motions that the dark matter hypothesis was invented to explain are also explainable by other hypotheses; in particular, by Milgrom's MOND hypothesis -- or possibly by full General Relativity, which is not normally used in these models, as it is very difficult computationally, but which in its first use in a galactic-scale model a few months ago, reproduced the effects of dark matter while utilising only the known baryonic matter.

This announcement is (in my opinion) yet another example of assuming that dark matter exists, and then using that assumption as an unchallenged given while presenting 'proof' of dark matter's existence.

Bill
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 03:25 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.