ROVER WHEELS: Monitoring changes over time, NOTE: Read back through the thread to avoid repeating misconceptions |
ROVER WHEELS: Monitoring changes over time, NOTE: Read back through the thread to avoid repeating misconceptions |
May 18 2013, 03:10 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4256 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Once of the test-bed rovers at JPL had flight like wheels whilst dealing with 3x the effective weight of a real rover. The wheels were punctured, dent ridden, ripped, torn, dinged, bashed, smashed, crunched. You could put your finger thru the holes in places - you could see clean thru them. And they still worked absolutely fine. Here's a pic showing the VSTB rover with that damage. Worth a thousand words. |
|
|
May 18 2013, 04:04 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14434 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
May 18 2013, 08:24 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1465 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Columbus OH USA Member No.: 13 |
Good thing Mars surface gravity is only 0.38g.
-------------------- |
|
|
May 18 2013, 08:57 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 7-January 13 Member No.: 6832 |
Given the level of damage observed so far on the rover wheels and the small distance traveled, if you linearly extrapolate future damage vs distance traveled, how far can the rover drive before a wheel fails? I know no one can answer that but I would assume modeling is being done to try to answer that question??
I would also assume the rover drives will be planned to avoid sharp rocks whenever possible? |
|
|
May 18 2013, 09:27 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 21-August 12 Member No.: 6598 |
It is. That 'hole' is a dent, the stress of the dent has popped the anodized coating off the inside of the wheel and we have bare aluminum reflecting the sun. That dent isn't in shadow. Those that are can reflect the bright martian sky off them. Just because something is in shadow - it doesn't mean it can't 'see the sky'. Look at it - it's not even the same color as the terrain behind it. And even if it IS punctured - it doesn't matter. Once of the test-bed rovers at JPL had flight like wheels whilst dealing with 3x the effective weight of a real rover. The wheels were punctured, dent ridden, ripped, torn, dinged, bashed, smashed, crunched. You could put your finger thru the holes in places - you could see clean thru them. And they still worked absolutely fine. That testbed now has tougher wheels simply to deal with terrestrial gravity. The lightweight scarecrow rover has flightlike wheels. I'm not sure how long it's going to take until saying 'the wheels are fine' before it gets boring. Infact, I think it might already have passed. I certainly don't know the coating or type of specific anodizing used, but anodizing in general is not a coating that can be "popped" off. Anodizing involves an etching process process to create a sponge-like texture into the metal. Dyes or other other additives are infused into the spongy porous surface of the metal. Could the anodized metal have a coating applied over it? Sure. I would rather suspect that a gouge in the metal which removed the anodized metal to expose the un-anodized surface. -J |
|
|
May 18 2013, 09:32 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2106 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Good thing there's no shortage of soft surfaces on the way to Mt. Sharp. The dune fields are looking inviting, ironically (obviously we haven't seen them from the surface yet so pure speculation on what they're like).
|
|
|
May 19 2013, 01:00 AM
Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2542 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
I certainly don't know the coating or type of specific anodizing used, but anodizing in general is not a coating that can be "popped" off. Anodizing is an electrochemical process whereby the top layer of aluminum is converted to alumina (AlO2) -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anodizing There are several types and they tend to produce different thicknesses of alumina. In my experience, you can get a thin layer to pop off if you work at it, but I suspect that these dents are just specular highlights off the intact anodizing, since the black anodizing is not very matte. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
May 19 2013, 01:08 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2542 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Given the level of damage observed so far on the rover wheels and the small distance traveled, if you linearly extrapolate future damage vs distance traveled, how far can the rover drive before a wheel fails? I would also assume the rover drives will be planned to avoid sharp rocks whenever possible? It's not really a linear process. The tire is one solid piece of aluminum. It would have to be ripped all the way across so it started unpeeling from the flexures before driving would be impeded. Like the viewgraphs I linked to earlier said, localized rupture in the tire was expected. We're talking about sharp pebbles, I don't think driving around them would be feasible. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
May 19 2013, 01:10 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2542 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Doug has seen the damaged VSTB wheels in person and I haven't, so he's in a better position than me to know if the anodizing is actually broken off or not.
-------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
May 19 2013, 01:15 AM
Post
#25
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14434 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
May 19 2013, 01:46 AM
Post
#26
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3009 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
The likely failure point will not be on the wheel tread surface itself, but at the annulus on the inner surface where the wheel spokes attach to the wheel.
--Bill -------------------- |
|
|
May 19 2013, 02:18 AM
Post
#27
|
||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2542 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
The likely failure point will not be on the wheel tread surface itself, but at the annulus on the inner surface where the wheel spokes attach to the wheel. I'm not following your reasoning; the entire tire is one piece of aluminum, beefed up where the flexures attach. Maybe the slide I referenced will be useful. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
||
May 19 2013, 04:42 AM
Post
#28
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1057 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
Cool design. Wheels are NOT a likely failure mode. How many ways need this be said before the subject is dropped?
|
|
|
May 19 2013, 05:31 AM
Post
#29
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14434 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
May 20 2013, 02:12 AM
Post
#30
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1592 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 07:19 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |