Future Stardust Missions?, What's She Gonna Do Now? |
Future Stardust Missions?, What's She Gonna Do Now? |
Jan 31 2006, 07:50 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 31-January 05 From: Havre, MT Member No.: 163 |
Hi folks...
I read today that Stardust has been placed in hibernation, while in an orbit that reaches out substantially further than Mars. No mention was made regarding future plans. I was curious... since the Dawn mission has been put on hold, is it possible that Stardust will be used to explore any bodies in the Belt? ...John... -------------------- "To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe..."
-- Carl Sagan |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Jan 31 2006, 07:54 PM
Post
#2
|
Guests |
QUOTE (John M. Dollan @ Jan 31 2006, 07:50 PM) Hi folks... I read today that Stardust has been placed in hibernation, while in an orbit that reaches out substantially further than Mars. No mention was made regarding future plans. I was curious... since the Dawn mission has been put on hold, is it possible that Stardust will be used to explore any bodies in the Belt? Note that potential proposers for the Discovery 2006 and Missions of Opportunity AO are being offered the option to propose uses for both Stardust and Deep Impact. |
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 08:09 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 31-January 05 From: Havre, MT Member No.: 163 |
Thanks much for the information!
...John... -------------------- "To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe..."
-- Carl Sagan |
|
|
Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Jan 31 2006, 09:57 PM
Post
#4
|
Guests |
I'm rather skeptical about an extended mission for Stardust. First, unless they can find another comet for it to fly by (as opposed to near-Earth asteroids), the only usable science instrument it has is a black and white camera. Second, it's much lower on remaining delta-V than Deep Impact is.
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 10:22 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
The Stardust people seemed quite bold and confident when suggesting such a follow on. I agree - DI is more likely to get an extension that Stardust, but given it's shielding, Stardust could be sent on a fairly do-or-die flyby of another nucleus in a few years. No reason why they can't just hibernate the thing as they have now for 4, 5 years, and wake it up in the way they did for Giotto for another flyby. Even just an imaging sequence would be another set of images of a small body.
Doug |
|
|
Feb 1 2006, 12:29 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4404 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Jan 31 2006, 09:57 PM) I'm rather skeptical about an extended mission for Stardust. First, unless they can find another comet for it to fly by (as opposed to near-Earth asteroids), the only usable science instrument it has is a black and white camera. Second, it's much lower on remaining delta-V than Deep Impact is. As for instruments, that is simply not true. First, it has the Cometary and Interstellar Dust Analyzer (CIDA), a mass spectrometer, and it also has the Dust Flux Monitor Instrument (DFMI). On top of that, it is only a black and white camera due to the stuck filter wheel. I remember reading that they thought they could likely free it, but didn't want to risk it later getting stuck on a less favorable filter during the main flyby. But at this point, they could risk it. -------------------- |
|
|
Guest_BruceMoomaw_* |
Feb 1 2006, 07:23 AM
Post
#7
|
Guests |
Well, I specified "unless they can find another comet" -- in which case of course those other two instruments do become relevant. It's if they fly it by an asteroid (a lot easier to do, given the number of them) that only the camera would be of any use.
|
|
|
Feb 1 2006, 05:15 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4404 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Feb 1 2006, 07:23 AM) Well, I specified "unless they can find another comet" -- in which case of course those other two instruments do become relevant. It's if they fly it by an asteroid (a lot easier to do, given the number of them) that only the camera would be of any use. Oops..missed that part -------------------- |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Feb 1 2006, 05:24 PM
Post
#9
|
Guests |
QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Feb 1 2006, 07:23 AM) Well, I specified "unless they can find another comet" -- in which case of course those other two instruments do become relevant. It's if they fly it by an asteroid (a lot easier to do, given the number of them) that only the camera would be of any use. I would only add that the radio system could be used during a flyby (e.g., for mass determination and/or occultation science). |
|
|
Feb 1 2006, 07:32 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Feb 1 2006, 06:24 PM) I would only add that the radio system could be used during an flyby (e.g., for mass determination and/or occultation science). That would only work if the spacecraft was reaction wheel stabilized. Does Stardust use reaction wheels or regular attitude thrusters? -------------------- |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Feb 1 2006, 07:38 PM
Post
#11
|
Guests |
QUOTE (ugordan @ Feb 1 2006, 07:32 PM) That would only work if the spacecraft was reaction wheel stabilized. Huh?? 3 axis-stabilized (and spin-stabilized) spacecraft have long carried out radio science experiments. Have you ever heard of, say, Voyager? |
|
|
Feb 1 2006, 07:45 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Feb 1 2006, 08:38 PM) Huh?? 3 axis-stabilized (and spin-stabilized) spacecraft have long carried out radio science experiments. Have you ever heard of, say, Voyager? Yeah, but you're talking about radio occultations. Mass determination requires long periods of radio tracking WITHOUT any perturbations such as attitude thruster firings as they would trash the effect. Similar to the problem of measuring the Pioneer anomalous acceleration with the Voyagers - impossible. Granted, I forgot about spin-stabilized craft, but Stardust isn't one such craft, is it? -------------------- |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Feb 1 2006, 07:52 PM
Post
#13
|
Guests |
QUOTE (ugordan @ Feb 1 2006, 07:45 PM) Yeah, but you're talking about radio occultations. Mass determination requires long periods of radio tracking WITHOUT any perturbations such as attitude thruster firings as they would trash the effect. Similar to the problem of measuring the Pioneer anomalous acceleration with the Voyagers - impossible. I ain't talkin' about "the Pioneer anomalous acceleration"; I'm talking about standard flyby mass determinations which, by definition, are not "long periods." Are you aware that 3-axis and spin-stabilized spacecraft have routinely done this over the decades? For example, Galileo (Galileans), Viking (Phobos/Deimos), etc. |
|
|
Feb 1 2006, 08:12 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Feb 1 2006, 08:52 PM) Are you aware that 3-axis and spin-stabilized spacecraft have routinely done this over the decades? For example, Galileo (Galileans), Viking (Phobos/Deimos), etc. I'm aware Galileo did mass determinations of either/both Gaspra and Ida, but it was spin stabilized craft. As for the Vikings, I'm not aware of the extent of their measurements, but a couple of hours of tracking data before and after the flyby might have probably done the trick. However, any attitude maneuvers during the measurement will likely destroy any gravitational effect, especially if a small target body is concerned. Another thing, determining a comet's mass might prove to be a bigger problem than that. Cometary particles impacting the S/C would also trash the the effect of the body's gravity. -------------------- |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Feb 1 2006, 08:53 PM
Post
#15
|
Guests |
QUOTE (ugordan @ Feb 1 2006, 08:12 PM) However, any attitude maneuvers during the measurement will likely destroy any gravitational effect, especially if a small target body is concerned. Which is precisely why attitude maneuvers are not planned when acquiring gravity data, regardless of spacecraft type. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 08:16 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |