http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/nasa-moon-announcement-when-watch-mission-b1209506.htmlNASA will be making an 'exciting' announcement regarding SOFIA observations of the Moon on the 26th... And that's more or less all we've got. Given what we know about the wavelengths SOFIA uses, and observation campaigns it's been used for that might be relevant to the Moon, I wondered if anyone might have any insight?
This is the only selected SOFIA observation out of 7 rounds to mention the moon.
https://www.sofia.usra.edu/science/proposing-and-observing/proposal-calls/cycle-7/selected-proposals/abstracts#61
Proposal ID: 07_0061
Principal Investigator: Paul Lucey
Title: Water abundance on the Moon from 6 µm observations
Abstract: This Thesis Enabling Program aims to detect or place upper limits on the abundance of molecular water on the lunar surface. A hydrogen-bearing species is causing an unexpected 3 µm absorption on the lunar surface. However existing data, including the proposers’ observations of the Moon at 3 µm using the InfraRed Telescope Facility (IRTF), cannot resolve the chemical form of this hydrogen, whether molecular water or the hydroxyl radical. The chemical form of the 3 µm absorber provides information on solar wind interaction with the lunar surface, and whether the hydrogen bearing compound is mobile. Low resolution spectroscopy at 6 µm is uniquely sensitive to the presence of molecular water in a spectral region both inaccessible from the ground and lacking in existing and planned spacecraft observations. SOFIA observations will enable definitive establishment of abundance limits of water and its degree of mobility. The project will produce 6 µm spectra of the Moon as a function of time, location and temperature for use by the wider planetary astronomy and lunar science community.
Thanks Doug!
Space.com is running an article which gives the names and positions of the presenters:
This may also be relevant.
https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2019/pdf/2199.pdf
My spies tell me this discussion is not off-track
The SOFIA related paper from the announcement:
I think it's fair to say that is possible, but we don't know it's true at this (what is in fact still quite early) stage in the investigation. I'd be surprised if there weren't regions of hogher concentration, as distributions of things in nature tend to be patchy, at least on some scale. But at this point all we can say is that this is probably enough data to justify in-situ follow up investigations - which are already planned. Judgement either way on practical fuel production is still premature at this point (my opinion only).
As a Moon hugger it is fascinating though. The more we explore the more interesting our nearest neighbour becomes (as is always the case with exploration).
Edit: I litre per 10 tons means processing a cube of regolith 2 meters-ish (regolith bulk density is around 1500kg /m^3 IIRC) on a side for 1 liter of water. If the water bearing regolith is easy to scoop up and process, then I might imagine a highly/fully automated 'slow accumulator' type process producing small amounts for niche applications (such as refuelling GEO satellites at intervals of years or more) But that's not just speculative, right now it's damn near sci-fi, which is the point I'm making.
Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)