The Return to Home Plate |
The Return to Home Plate |
Jun 11 2007, 08:32 PM
Post
#301
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 530 Joined: 21-March 06 From: Canada Member No.: 721 |
|
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 11:23 PM
Post
#302
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 910 Joined: 4-September 06 From: Boston Member No.: 1102 |
You are right Tesheiner, the change of plans is in the just released update
"Having completed studies of bright, silica-rich soil deposits at a target known as "Gertrude Weise," Spirit drove to a perch on the eastern edge of the circular, plateau-like feature known as "Home Plate" and began studying its stratigraphy. Spirit will next drive back in the direction of Gertrude Weise to study another nearby outcrop. The nearby outcrop, known as "Nancy Warren," appears similar to a previously studied outcrop known as "Elizabeth Mahon" that had a silica content of approximately 72 percent, somewhat lower than the 90-percent silica measaured at Gertrude Weise." -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 09:26 AM
Post
#303
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1619 Joined: 12-February 06 From: Bergerac - FR Member No.: 678 |
Thanks nprev and Dicktone
To follow this jvandriel panorama, I've made my own, with a larger resolution. And an analgyph : All resolutions here : http://www.astrosurf.com/merimages/Images_...-2007.html#pano -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 10:16 AM
Post
#304
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Subotica Member No.: 384 |
...with a larger resolution... Thank you! I love to see nice Hi-res panorama. -------------------- The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr... |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 06:32 PM
Post
#305
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 07:58 PM
Post
#306
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 910 Joined: 4-September 06 From: Boston Member No.: 1102 |
Fantastic Mosaic! The Geology is just so amazing.
-------------------- |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 09:04 PM
Post
#307
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2918 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
...The Geology is just so amazing. It's NOT Geology Floyd, it's NOT Geology! What else than a dinosaur vertebral column can it be ! Fascinating picture(s) anyway. -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 11:14 PM
Post
#308
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 910 Joined: 4-September 06 From: Boston Member No.: 1102 |
I guess it's Marsology not Geology . Can't be stratigraphy as my dictionary defines that as the study of the stratified rocks of the earth's crust. I guess there are no words to describe the study of rocks on other planets.
You'r right Climber, it is an undescribable fascinating image. I particularly like the bird beak rock. -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 13 2007, 04:28 AM
Post
#309
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2228 Joined: 1-December 04 From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA Member No.: 116 |
It's a beautiful view of a beautiful outcrop, alan. Thanks.
-------------------- ...Tom
I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast. |
|
|
Jun 13 2007, 11:33 AM
Post
#310
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10146 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Phil checking in from sunny Winchester, UK.
Floyd, get a better dictionary. Geo- means land, not planet Earth. This whole issue was settled 45 years ago (notably by Luciano Ronca) and the usage is very well established. Unless you want a different -ology for every one of the 60 or so worlds we can study today, you use geology for all of them. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Jun 13 2007, 12:44 PM
Post
#311
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3431 Joined: 11-August 04 From: USA Member No.: 98 |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2007, 12:52 PM
Post
#312
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 910 Joined: 4-September 06 From: Boston Member No.: 1102 |
Fantastic Mosaic! The Geology is just so amazing. It's NOT Geology Floyd, it's NOT Geology! What else than a dinosaur vertebral column can it be ! Fascinating picture(s) anyway. I guess it's Marsology not Geology . Can't be stratigraphy as my dictionary defines that as the study of the stratified rocks of the earth's crust. I guess there are no words to describe the study of rocks on other planets. You'r right Climber, it is an undescribable fascinating image. I particularly like the bird beak rock. Floyd, get a better dictionary. Geo- means land, not planet Earth. This whole issue was settled 45 years ago (notably by Luciano Ronca) and the usage is very well established. Unless you want a different -ology for every one of the 60 or so worlds we can study today, you use geology for all of them. Phil Phil, I thought Climber was busting my chops about using Geology. I tried to respond humerously. Floyd -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 13 2007, 01:53 PM
Post
#313
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
I've heard people try to use "areology" for the study of Martian landforms, "selenology" for the study of lunar landforms, etc. Frankly, I'd rather just use the term "geology" for all of them, and I'm glad there is an acceptance of the term as it applies to the study of non-terrestrial landforms.
-the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jun 13 2007, 02:28 PM
Post
#314
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
I know we've wandered OT here but can't resist comment on what is bound to become a terminology minefield. Geology is fine for rocks, and anything that behaves in a rock-like fashion. But think about ice - we have Glaciology on Earth, but (presumably) Ice Geology on the moons of the outer solar system. Which is it to be on Mars? - on Ceres? Then there's liquids that flow about, evaporate and recondense. Should that always be Hydrology, even if the liquid isn't water? People seem to balk at that. What about the behaviour of carbon dioxide at the Martian poles - is that Geology? Can you really have a 'rock' that exchanges with the major constituent of the atmosphere via sublimation? Or should that be Meteorology? As to the various goings-on on Io - that probably requires an Omniologist. And that's before we even start going extra-solar . . .
|
|
|
Jun 13 2007, 08:48 PM
Post
#315
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4246 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
This sol 1221 hazcam image shows beautifully the difference 450 sols makes: Crossing in front of the front wheels you can see the faint tracks from sol 774.
I could imagine the regular tracks being essentially invisible after 5 or 10 years. The wheel drag marks will be around for a lot longer - maybe even when tourists start doing "Spirit trail". |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 08:54 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |