IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
'rock' satellite flybys, The next ten weeks
jasedm
post Aug 14 2008, 09:35 AM
Post #16


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



Can't compare to Enceladus' close-up of course, but Cassini has a moderately close approach (non-targeted) to the moon Pallene on the 19th August, and I understand there are some planned images in the sequences.
The approach distance is just under 40,000km, although images probably won't be taken bang-on C/A.
The moon is only ~4km across, but with luck, a few shots in the order of about 15 pixels in the NAC should be possible.

The best raw images I could find to date of Pallene were taken on June 8th 2005 and the distance to target is not given. From the apparent diameter of the moon in the images though, I'm guessing range was between 50,000km and 100,000km.
Below is one of those images cropped, enhanced, and magnified x4
The speckling evident is likely artefacts of the processing rather than actual surface features, but it does show pronounced non-sphericity.

Hopefully if the sequences on Rev 81 do include Pallene, we may see a crater or two at the high phase angles



Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ken90000
post Aug 22 2008, 02:54 PM
Post #17


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 8-November 06
From: Indiana, USA
Member No.: 1337



Did we miss Pallene? The images appear blank. I had hoped that we would see some detail on its tiny ten-pixel surface.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tallbear
post Aug 22 2008, 04:32 PM
Post #18


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 45
Joined: 30-November 05
Member No.: 592



QUOTE (Ken90000 @ Aug 22 2008, 06:54 AM) *
Did we miss Pallene? The images appear blank. I had hoped that we would see some detail on its tiny ten-pixel surface.



Yes... Pallene was missed...No Live Update was performed
but it would not have mattered .... Pallene was in Eclipse .


T
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ken90000
post Aug 23 2008, 09:45 PM
Post #19


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 55
Joined: 8-November 06
From: Indiana, USA
Member No.: 1337



Thanks, T

Perhaps there will be another opportunity later in the mission.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jasedm
post Aug 24 2008, 02:29 PM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



The relevant looking-ahead article on Ciclops suggested imaging attempts whilst Pallene was in direct sunlight, so was this a pointing error, or was that part of the sequence not uploaded to the spacecraft?
Cassini flies closer (around 30,000km) on 17th October this year, but I think there is a downlink during close-approach so images are unlikely to be planned.
This means no closer images than the 2005 ones in the XM. sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Feb 3 2009, 11:26 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



Lots of great images of DAPHNIS--potential movie. In this image you can see Daphnis' shadow on the rings. Additional representative images 2, 3, 4. The gores seem to be drawn out of the plane and catch the sun.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jasedm
post Feb 5 2009, 04:49 PM
Post #22


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 655
Joined: 22-January 06
Member No.: 655



It seems Daphnis kicks a lot of material up out of the ringplane and into sunlight as it orbits. It certainly causes more obvious ring material disturbances than does Pan within the Encke gap.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Feb 5 2009, 05:20 PM
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (jasedm @ Aug 14 2008, 10:35 AM) *
The best raw images I could find to date of Pallene were taken on June 8th 2005 and the distance to target is not given.

For what it's worth, here's that dataset in calibrated natural color, magnified 4x:
Attached Image

No other enhancements were done. Target distance was reported to be 76 000 km, phase angle 21 degrees. Effectively featureless surface, down to the NAC resolving power. It does appear to have a noticeable bluish tint to it, something Prometheus, Pandora and inner ring moons don't share, but Telesto does.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Feb 5 2009, 09:23 PM
Post #24


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 444
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



Will there be any opportunities for better images of Pallene in the current mission?

TTT

Edit: The three Pallene encounters listed on the Cassini site for 2009 are all further away the June 8, 2005 image (94,000 km or further).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pat
post Feb 11 2009, 12:26 PM
Post #25


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 19-October 05
Member No.: 532



QUOTE (Tom Tamlyn @ Feb 5 2009, 09:23 PM) *
Will there be any opportunities for better images of Pallene in the current mission?

TTT

Edit: The three Pallene encounters listed on the Cassini site for 2009 are all further away the June 8, 2005 image (94,000 km or further).


there are no flyby observation of Pallene during 2009. The only Pallene flyby request in 2010 that is still a possibility is the one in rev 128 on DOY 79, that segment of the extended mission hasn't been integrated yet (the one in rev 130 on DOY 117 seems to be Dead Right There due to an RSS gravity pass during the Enceladus flyby)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th April 2024 - 04:27 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.