Falcon Surprise, SpaceX Says Something Big is Coming |
Falcon Surprise, SpaceX Says Something Big is Coming |
Apr 5 2011, 04:01 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
From SpaceX about two hours ago.
QUOTE Something Big is Coming Judging from the video (and the fact that the Falcon 9 Heavy Maiden Launch showed up on their mainifest a month or two ago) I'm guessing this'll be the F9H announcement. But, given the fanfare, it could be anything.ElonMusk Holding Press Conference on Tuesday, April 5th Elon Musk,CEO and Chief Technical Officer of SpaceX, will hold a press conference on Tuesday, April 5th at 11:20am EST to discuss SpaceX's latest venture. Get a sneakpeak of the discussion on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th6HQ9RtVCE. The press conference will be webcast live at: http://www.visualwebcaster.com/spacex. The press conference will also be accessible via the home page ofSpaceX.com by clicking the main banner. If you are unable to watch live, the press conference will be archived at http://www.visualwebcaster.com/spacex for future viewing. --Greg This post has been edited by Astro0: Apr 5 2011, 04:31 AM
Reason for edit: Edited to fix formatting problems
|
|
|
Apr 5 2011, 04:35 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 131 Joined: 31-May 08 From: San Carlos, California, USA Member No.: 4168 |
I've taken all the fanfare to mean that SpaceX hired a new Chief of Marketing, who has promptly turned it up to 10.
|
|
|
Apr 5 2011, 06:23 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 14-July 06 Member No.: 972 |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2011, 11:49 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 70 Joined: 12-November 06 Member No.: 1354 |
If Space X gets this thing off the ground (and they have come close on all their other vehicle predictions) the Falcon Heavy (FH) will have a huge impact on the launch market since it is advertised to reach the mythic $1000/lb to LEO. How much that would impact interplanetary science launch costs remains to be seen.
Edit; Elon did say that a single FH launch could handle the entire Mars sample return mission. The Falcon Heavy has enough power to reach Mars with a 30,000-pound payload with a launch cost of around $100 million. |
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 02:37 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Spaceflight Now says NASA is eager to certify the regular Falcon 9 for unmanned space probes.
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n1104/04launchcosts/ |
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 04:43 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Anyone have any idea why the maiden launch for FH would be from Vandenberg? Ideal for a polar launch, of course, but why do that?
|
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 05:30 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14448 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Pad ready quicker? Less conflicts on the range? Closer to Hawthorne? I can think of lots of reasons.
|
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 05:37 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1598 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
Beats me.
Because there is a brand new space launch complex there for the Delta IV heavy that probably won't be doing very much? edit: Actually, looks like they'll be using the Titan IV SLC-4 that the air force should've kept around a little longer. Might just allow more multitasking. |
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 01:08 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 813 Joined: 8-February 04 From: Arabia Terra Member No.: 12 |
I wonder what could be done with a little New Horizons size spacecraft + kick stage on a monster launch vehicle like that. Flybys of Eris or Sedna?
|
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 01:44 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 593 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
~12 tonnes in low Mars orbit would be rather entertaining, too!
|
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 04:33 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Anyone have any idea why the maiden launch for FH would be from Vandenberg? Ideal for a polar launch, of course, but why do that? Because the pad at the Cape doesn't support the Heavy and would need a new integration hangar, new ground support equipment, additional propellant tanks, etc. All that would interfere with the planned COTS/CRS launches and I think neither SpaceX nor NASA want that. They plan on adding support for the Heavy there in late 2013/early 2014. Also, the Air Force kind of gave them a requirement that to be eligible for EELV program contracts, they would need a west coast pad for polar launches and a vehicle more capable than the standard Falcon 9. So they're attempting to kill two birds with one stone. -------------------- |
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 04:34 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
~12 tonnes in low Mars orbit would be rather entertaining, too! 12 tons to TMI and 12 tons in Mars orbit are two different things. -------------------- |
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 06:46 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 593 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
12 tons to TMI and 12 tons in Mars orbit are two different things. Oh, agreed. If the Earth-orbited 52 tonne figure is correct and the back of my envelope is working, ~6.2km/s takes you from LEO to LMO, and that delta V gives you a 12T final mass with a LH/LOX rocket of specific impulse ~450. Andy |
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 07:09 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
I wouldn't count on Falcon Heavy having anything near those 53 mt in the near future. The current 1st stage tank size simply doesn't support that kind of propellant load. Wer'e talking 1450 tons liftoff mass compared to 310 t of current Falcon 9.
It seems obvious an upgrade path at one point would be to stretch the tank by as much as 40 or 50% to take advantage of the upgraded Merlin engine thrust. The CGI video shows a Falcon Heavy with current tank sizes and I'd wager that one would put in the ballpark of previous Falcon 9 Heavy estimates - about 30 tons to LEO. Tanks stretched by that much would look unnaturally skinny for F9's diameter. -------------------- |
|
|
Apr 6 2011, 09:37 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1598 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
I wouldn't count on Falcon Heavy having anything near those 53 mt in the near future. The current 1st stage tank size simply doesn't support that kind of propellant load. Wer'e talking 1450 tons liftoff mass compared to 310 t of current Falcon 9. I know you follow this stuff closer than I do, but I saw something mention that the center 1st stage tank would stay full due to connections to the strap-ons. Is that where the figure comes from? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 10:53 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |