A new old Enterprise..., Boldly going soon... |
A new old Enterprise..., Boldly going soon... |
Nov 12 2008, 10:37 PM
Post
#1
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Any Trek fans out there who haven't seen the new-look Enterprise from the new movie, just click here...
Shiny! -------------------- |
|
|
Nov 12 2008, 10:43 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1582 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
Wow, they've taken warp drives and added variable inlet geometry! Who knew air-breathing engine technology would help in creating a warp field?
|
|
|
Nov 13 2008, 01:38 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Shiny indeed, and I see that the phased array is gone & the parabolic dish is back!
The inlets must be for the sublight drive; who needs impulse power when you got twin Bussard ramjets! -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Nov 13 2008, 01:40 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Half the internet exploded last night when they released this picture.
I, for one, absolutely love it. -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Nov 13 2008, 04:04 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1582 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
|
|
|
Nov 13 2008, 04:09 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
how is impulse supposed to work? It goes forward on a whim. -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Nov 13 2008, 04:17 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1419 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
I must say I'm repulsed by this design.
I think they went a bit too far, but that's just my honest opinion. I prefer the original to this one. -------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Nov 13 2008, 05:15 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8783 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
True though... how is impulse supposed to work? Without slipping into full-blown geekiness here, I always thought that it was a field-pinch fusion drive. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Nov 13 2008, 06:22 AM
Post
#9
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
It goes forward on a whim. Awful. Very funny, but AWFUL!!!!! They're obviously trying to make the film's Enterprise look more "realistic", in that it now fits visually into the timeline between Archer's Enterprise and the V'Ger-chasing Enterprise. I think it works, personally. Lovely sweeping lines, the familiar saucer section... Good to have the Old Lady back on the big screen. -------------------- |
|
|
Nov 13 2008, 05:27 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1276 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
I love it!
What would they do? Can't use the 60's design!?!? I hope we get a series spin off. Also check out Uhura! What a Fox! http://www.imdb.com/media/rm2214302208/nm0757855 |
|
|
Nov 14 2008, 01:16 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4404 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! When I was in college, my Psychology professor subjected us to Star Trek clips. My sophomore roommate subjected me to whole episodes. I have since had nightmares about it. No one should have to suffer through that show again.
-------------------- |
|
|
Nov 14 2008, 05:08 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Ted?
I find your lack of faith disturbing... -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Nov 14 2008, 05:14 AM
Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
As for my own reaction to this version of NCC-1701, I was afraid they were going to try something like this. After they made Archer's Enterprise look a lot sexier than the original series' starship, I was worried that any TOS prequel movie was going to try and make the Enterprise look sleeker and higher tech than Kirk's ship.
As far as design goes, it's like a company was making Italian sportscars for generations, and for one single generation decided to retrofit all of their products to look like a 1970 Volvo. It's possible to make the original TOS version of a Constitution-class starship look and move really great without damaging the original design -- they did it with CGI in the "Mirror, Darkly" two-parter near the end of ST:Enterprise's last season. I'm unhappy that some guy has decided to remake the Star Trek canon in order to produce Starfleet 90210. Sigh. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Nov 17 2008, 02:37 AM
Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1276 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
QUOTE It's possible to make the original TOS version of a Constitution-class starship look and move really great without damaging the original design -- they did it with CGI in the "Mirror, Darkly" two-parter near the end of ST:Enterprise's last season I'm sorry But I disagree 100% on this. Those where made for TV episodes! |
|
|
Nov 17 2008, 11:06 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 593 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
Hmmm...a discussion on unmannedspaceflight of mannedunspaceflight!
Andy. Not a fan. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th April 2024 - 08:14 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |