IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

27 Pages V  « < 17 18 19 20 21 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Dawn Mission, pre-launch disscusion
BPCooper
post Jul 6 2007, 11:45 PM
Post #271


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 22-October 05
From: Daytona Beach / Cape Canaveral, FL
Member No.: 534



Hate to be the informer but its NET July 15 now. I have a feeling...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_AlexBlackwell_*
post Jul 7 2007, 12:11 AM
Post #272





Guests






Jeez, this is turning from bad to rotten, quickly. I wonder if Ed "The Axe" Weiler were still running SMD whether he would be close to saying, "Take it off the pad and ship it to NASM."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mars loon
post Jul 7 2007, 02:19 AM
Post #273


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Princeton, NJ, USA
Member No.: 212



Here is the latest just in on the July 15 launch target from spaceflightnow.com

------

FRIDAY, JULY 6, 2007
2355 GMT (7:55 p.m. EDT)

ANOTHER DELAY. The Dawn asteroid exploration mission won't be launching before Sunday, July 15, NASA officials announced Friday evening after extensive decisions about the availability of downrange tracking assets and the overall readiness to go fly.

The United Launch Alliance Delta 2-Heavy rocket stands fully assembled with Dawn nestled inside the vehicle's nose cone at Cape Canaveral's pad 17B.

But this is the third delay in the past two days for the launch. Stormy weather prevented the Delta 2 rocket's second stage from being fueled on Thursday, forcing the liftoff to be delayed from Saturday to Sunday. NASA decided early Friday morning to slip the launch another 24 hours - to Monday - because of troubles with a telemetry-relay aircraft.

Problems with the tracking plane and delays getting a substitute ship into the Atlantic Ocean region has been a source of headaches for the launch officials. Either the aircraft or the instrumented ship is required to receive telemetry from the rocket during the second and third stage firings off the west-central coast of Africa. Without a mobile tracking asset in place, engineers would have no insight or data while those critical events of the launch occur.

NASA is racing against the calendar because Dawn's current launch opportunity closes July 19, giving just a few days left to get the spacecraft on the required trajectory to fly past Mars for a sling-shot maneuver and then into the asteroid belt for its rendezvous with Vesta and Ceres over the next eight years.

If this period is missed, another one opens in September and extends through late October.

What impact, if any, this latest delay could have to the planned August 3 launch of the Mars lander Phoenix aboard another Delta 2 rocket from the neighboring pad is not immediately clear. The alignment of the planets dictates a tight August 3 to August 24 window for the Phoenix liftoff to happen.

The start of Dawn's mission to examine up close two of the solar system's largest asteroids has been hit by a number of setbacks, including outright cancellation of the project in March 2006. After a heated controversy, NASA restarted the mission less than a month later.

Plans called for the launch to happen June 20, but that date was scrapped because more time was needed to prepare the Delta rocket before on-pad assembly could start. Then a targeted June 30 launch day was doomed when the pad's crane developed a problem last month, causing a hiatus in attaching the solid-fuel boosters.

Launch on July 15 would be possible during a window stretching from 3:22 to 3:54 p.m. EDT.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Analyst_*
post Jul 7 2007, 01:15 PM
Post #274





Guests






QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Jul 7 2007, 12:11 AM) *
Jeez, this is turning from bad to rotten, quickly. I wonder if Ed "The Axe" Weiler were still running SMD whether he would be close to saying, "Take it off the pad and ship it to NASM."


AFAIK all delays from June 20th onwards have nothing to do with the spacecraft itself but with the launch vehicle or support equipment (tracking assets, crane etc.). I repeat myself with saying this isn't only bad luck but also a lack of planning, contincency planning, lack of strategy etc.

Analyst
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 7 2007, 01:21 PM
Post #275


Administrator
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 13232
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Anyone who has read and understood Jim's posts can see why the situation is as it is - and given the resources available, no ammount of contingency or planning could have avoided it.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jim from NSF.com
post Jul 7 2007, 02:39 PM
Post #276


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Cape Canaveral
Member No.: 734



QUOTE (Analyst @ Jul 7 2007, 09:15 AM) *
AFAIK all delays from June 20th onwards have nothing to do with the spacecraft itself but with the launch vehicle or support equipment (tracking assets, crane etc.). I repeat myself with saying this isn't only bad luck but also a lack of planning, contincency planning, lack of strategy etc.

Analyst


Not so. You have no clue what is going on. No amount of planning would have avoided these "things" and allowed Dawn to launch any earlier. The strategy is to launch Dawn ASAP

1. Crane. Crap happens. No amount of planning would avoid this
2. TM airplane upon returning from depot maintenance experiences a delamination of an aileron
3. TM airplane experiences failure in mission equipment
4. TM ship experiences stronger currents than planned
5. weather

A. TM airplane is owned by the Army and supports many users, most with higher priorities
B. The TM equipment is owned by the USAF and the boat is chartered.
C. NASA "contracts" both for assets, but they managed by their owning org, NASA just requests where they are needed and when. How they get their is determined by the owning org.


Let's see you put together a decision matrix to take all this into account. Meanwhile, spacecraft contractor is charging for the delays and ULA is charging for the delays (TM is a NASA requirement).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 7 2007, 03:00 PM
Post #277


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6474
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Yeow. Sounds horribly familiar, Jim, and I agree with you. The only thing in your list that makes me mad is that delaminated aileron; that definitely should have been caught & fixed by the Depot contractor, and I hope NASA/DCMA(?) is raising hell with them about it...pretty shoddy.

Come to that, though, most planes need at least two weeks to shake out problems after coming out of Depot; pity there apparently isn't enough asset depth to permit this to happen & it had to fly a hot mission so soon. sad.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jul 7 2007, 03:04 PM
Post #278


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3534
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (Jim from NSF.com @ Jul 7 2007, 03:39 PM) *
Crap happens.

I blame everything that's happened on gremlins.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jim from NSF.com
post Jul 7 2007, 03:59 PM
Post #279


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 321
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Cape Canaveral
Member No.: 734



QUOTE (nprev @ Jul 7 2007, 11:00 AM) *
should have been caught & fixed by the Depot contractor, and I hope NASA/DCMA(?) is raising hell with them about it...pretty shoddy.


It is not NASA's plane.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BPCooper
post Jul 7 2007, 08:42 PM
Post #280


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 22-October 05
From: Daytona Beach / Cape Canaveral, FL
Member No.: 534



It's off till September officially. :-(


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tom Tamlyn
post Jul 7 2007, 08:54 PM
Post #281


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 264
Joined: 1-July 05
From: New York City
Member No.: 424



Since they didn't fuel the second stage, I gather (based on the press conference) that they will have a longer September window than if they had been forced to find a new second stage. That's a (very) small sliver lining.

TTT
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BPCooper
post Jul 7 2007, 09:01 PM
Post #282


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 22-October 05
From: Daytona Beach / Cape Canaveral, FL
Member No.: 534



I believe the September window (planetary window) opens Sept. 7. I might be wrong though.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
belleraphon1
post Jul 7 2007, 11:08 PM
Post #283


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 29-December 05
From: NE Oh, USA
Member No.: 627



All...

http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2007/jul/H...stpone_Sep.html

"NASA will hold a news briefing at 11:30 a.m. EDT on Monday, July 9, to preview the launch of the Phoenix Mars Lander. Prior to the Phoenix presentations, media will have the opportunity to learn in more detail about the rescheduled Dawn launch.[i][u] The briefing will originate from the NASA Headquarters auditorium, 300 E St., S.W., Washington. It will air live on NASA Television and be streamed online at: http://www.nasa.gov/ntv"

Craig
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BPCooper
post Jul 7 2007, 11:23 PM
Post #284


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 22-October 05
From: Daytona Beach / Cape Canaveral, FL
Member No.: 534



SFN story:

http://www.spaceflightnow.com/delta/d325/070707delay.html


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 8 2007, 01:00 AM
Post #285


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 6474
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



(sigh)... sad.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

27 Pages V  « < 17 18 19 20 21 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 08:50 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is a project of the Planetary Society and is funded by donations from visitors and members. Help keep this forum up and running by contributing here.