"Dewdrop" spotted on Titan..? |
"Dewdrop" spotted on Titan..? |
Dec 16 2008, 07:15 AM
Post
#1
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Dec 16 2008, 08:44 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 688 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Sweden Member No.: 273 |
Would methane dew really collect on Huygens? I would expect the probe to be warmer than its surroundings, not colder.
|
|
|
Dec 17 2008, 04:14 PM
Post
#3
|
||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
The last 50km of the descent exposed Huygens to colder temperatures. I recollect that methane was evaporated from the surface by the 'hot' intake for the mass spectrometer. However, I expect that the rest of the probe's exterior was cold, being well insulated from the warm interior.
http://www.obspm.fr/actual/nouvelle/nov05/titan.en.shtml |
|
|
||
Dec 17 2008, 04:36 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Also, keep in mind that Huygens was thermally insulated pretty well so on the outside it could have conceivably cooled to ambient temperature.
-------------------- |
|
|
Dec 18 2008, 12:04 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1372 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
You know it's nice to remember we have pictures from the surface, I had not seen that in many months and it brings back a nice warm feeling of a successful mission.
|
|
|
Dec 18 2008, 02:21 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 610 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD Member No.: 1764 |
Also, keep in mind that Huygens was thermally insulated pretty well so on the outside it could have conceivably cooled to ambient temperature. exactly - see my analysis of the thermal interaction of Huygens with its environment http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~rlorenz/huygens_thermal.pdf |
|
|
Dec 18 2008, 07:41 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 688 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Sweden Member No.: 273 |
As far as I can see you estimate in the paper that the skin temperature of Huygens was 5 K above ambient at landing rising to "a few tens of K above ambient" which I should think would preclude condensation.
|
|
|
Dec 19 2008, 08:14 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
As far as I can see you estimate in the paper that the skin temperature of Huygens was 5 K above ambient at landing rising to "a few tens of K above ambient" which I should think would preclude condensation. From the link in the opening post: "Scientists think heat from the probe caused humid air to rise and condense on the cold edge of the craft." I think protruding edges would be closer to the ambient temperature than would the overall surface temperature of the probe. And since the ambient temperature quickly rose 24 degrees before impact: "....just prior to surface impact, although the environmental temperature increases from 70 to 94 K...." (from Ralph Lorenz's paper), I can see how it would be possible for protruding edges such as those around the DISR to be colder than the surface ambient temperature for a while after landing. |
|
|
Dec 19 2008, 02:48 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 610 Joined: 23-February 07 From: Occasionally in Columbia, MD Member No.: 1764 |
As far as I can see you estimate in the paper that the skin temperature of Huygens was 5 K above ambient at landing rising to "a few tens of K above ambient" which I should think would preclude condensation. As long as a surface like the DISR baffle is cooler than the ground spot heated by the lamp you can have condensation |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 03:14 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |