IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

31 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
The western route, 5th leg after stop at Absecon / Reeds Bay
Poolio
post Jul 28 2009, 04:04 PM
Post #106


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 28-October 08
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 4469



QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Jul 27 2009, 11:13 PM) *
Yes, the reason is to go back for a look at the rock, Block Island.

True, but in post 52 Tim Parker suggests that there are other reasons as well. We'll just have to wait and see.

(BTW, whenever I see or hear any reference to Ozymandias, all I can think of is Graham Chapman stumbling around drunk in Monty Python's Michael Ellis episode. A bit unfortunate...)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 28 2009, 05:29 PM
Post #107


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Other reasons we're going to the rock (other than it being big). Not that there are other reasons to go in that direction.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PaulM
post Jul 28 2009, 05:38 PM
Post #108


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 206
Joined: 15-August 07
From: Shrewsbury, Shropshire
Member No.: 3233



QUOTE (CryptoEngineer @ Jul 28 2009, 03:12 PM) *
This is probably a stupid question, but.....

Are meteorites on Mars actually interesting? I'm fully aware that BI may be a piece of deep ejecta, and appreciate why that would make it worth investigating, but the rovers have seen a couple well identified meteorites, and spent some considerable time going over them.

What can we learn from them that is different than what we would learn from meteorites on Earth?

CE

I suspect that each time a cobble is investigated it is hoped that it is not a meteorite but rather a rock from some distance away on Mars. Opportunity has studied hundreds of rather simillar local Meridiani rocks and so a rock from elsewhere on Mars is of great interest.

Such a rock is Bounce Rock which was found by Opportunity in April 2004. The rock was named for the fact that it was struck by Opportunity as the craft bounced to a stop during its landing stage. Bounce Rock bears a striking resemblance to a class of meteorites found on Earth known as shergottites, that are believed to have originated from Mars:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_Rock

I think that the Mars rock which would be of most interest would be another fragment of the formation of which the Antarctic meteorite AH84001 formed a part:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Hills_84001

The large meteorite which blasted AH84001 into space presumably blasted another million fragments of this formation into space. At least one of these fragments must currently be lying on the plain of Meridiani.

I understand that the most interesting meteorites of all would be fragments of the Earth close to 4 billion years old. Metamophism has severely altered all rocks of this age on Earth but it has been suggested that fresh fragments of Earth rocks of this age could be found on the Moon or Mars.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 28 2009, 05:52 PM
Post #109


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4246
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (PaulM @ Jul 28 2009, 06:38 PM) *
At least one of these fragments must currently be lying on the plain of Meridiani.

How can we be sure? Even if the ejecta from the AH84001 impact spread globally over Mars, what would be the surface number density of ejecta pieces large enough for Oppy to study, as a function of distance to the impact antipode?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 28 2009, 07:52 PM
Post #110


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (CryptoEngineer @ Jul 28 2009, 09:12 AM) *
...the rovers have seen a couple well identified meteorites, and spent some considerable time going over them.

The rocks did not become "well identified" until after going over them. An assumption that a rock is a meteorite before inspection could turn out to be wrong. More is learned about the geology of Mars if the rocks turn out to be Martian, but I guess the crater counters are interested in the number of surviving meteors on the surface.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 28 2009, 08:31 PM
Post #111


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (PaulM @ Jul 28 2009, 12:38 PM) *
...I think that the Mars rock which would be of most interest would be another fragment of the formation of which the Antarctic meteorite AH84001 formed a part....

It would be as interesting as Bounce rock: A piece of Mars from far away. I wonder if Opportunity would even be capable of detecting the carbonates in AH84001.

My vote for most interesting rock would be a chunk of limestone. laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Jul 28 2009, 11:08 PM
Post #112


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



Astrophil, I think your reading is correct -- thanks!

Cryptoengineer, you make a good point re value of Block Island as a meteorite vs. piece of ejecta. But it's hard for us space junkies to ever think about a meteorite as anything but way cool -- even laying on the surface of Mars.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 28 2009, 11:52 PM
Post #113


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



If ever you want proof of how cool a meteorite is, take a piece of Canyon Diablo (the meteorite that blasted out Meteor Crater) into a school classroom full of 6 year olds and let them hold it... "That's from space... it fell from the sky 50,000 years ago...!" Wow...! Then let them hold a piece (or in my case some VERY small pieces!) of a Mars meteorite... "... and that's from the planet Mars..." Cue eyes wide as saucers and a mouth formed into an amazed "o" shape...

Priceless... smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
PDP8E
post Jul 29 2009, 01:52 AM
Post #114


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 10-October 06
From: Maynard Mass USA
Member No.: 1241



nothing much happening .... so a super zoomed image of Block Island ...hyper processed
(zounds! the jpeg artifacts are awful!)

Attached Image



oh well...


--------------------
CLA CLL
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jul 29 2009, 05:21 AM
Post #115


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



QUOTE (PaulM @ Jul 28 2009, 11:38 AM) *
...
I understand that the most interesting meteorites of all would be fragments of the Earth close to 4 billion years old. Metamophism has severely altered all rocks of this age on Earth but it has been suggested that fresh fragments of Earth rocks of this age could be found on the Moon or Mars.


What a far-out thought! Those possibilities had not occurred to me, though they should have. Thanks for mentioning that, Paul. smile.gif Do you have a reference to who first suggested it?


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jul 29 2009, 06:24 AM
Post #116


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1043
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



Given that any ejecta from an Earth impact would be going the wrong way in the gravitational well, what would be the probability that it could have the kick off velocity necessary to reach the orbit of Mars? And since Mars sweeps a greater orbit than Earth, wouldn't this further diminish the possibility of impact? Given the resouces available on site, how could we identify the provenance in any case?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 29 2009, 07:25 AM
Post #117


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Jul 29 2009, 01:21 AM) *
Do you have a reference to who first suggested it?

The following is a study reported in 1989 which references previous studies.

Science News Mar 25, 1989
"According to S.A. Phinney... kicking a rock hard enough to free it from Earth's gravity would require a meteorite capable of making a crater more than 60 miles across. In addition, Mars' orbit is much larger than Earth's, so the chance of an Earth rock hitting Mars is about 10 percent that of the same thing in reverse....

...The group found fewer particles seemed likely to get to Mars than suggested by some previous analyses."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Jul 29 2009, 08:32 AM
Post #118


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



Looks like an iron meteorite. But a very intimidating one with a strange hole in one side. I hope it doesn't bite!
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...ARP0713L0M1.JPG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 29 2009, 08:35 AM
Post #119


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14431
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



That is a big ass chunky lump of metal I think. It'd be worth a fortune if it was on Earth smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
remcook
post Jul 29 2009, 08:38 AM
Post #120


Rover Driver
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1015
Joined: 4-March 04
Member No.: 47



Looks like the Beagle-2! *ducks and runs*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

31 Pages V  « < 6 7 8 9 10 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 02:19 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.