IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
STS-124, Kibo to the ISS
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post May 31 2008, 09:32 PM
Post #16





Guests






I saw a lot of debris falling away. Hope nothing struck the orbiter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mars loon
post May 31 2008, 09:36 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Princeton, NJ, USA
Member No.: 212



beautiful launch

a small piece of foam did strike the underbelly of the shuttle shortly after SRB sep.

clearly visible via the camera on the ET.

did not appear to strike the RCC panels on the wing leading edge

this is likely after the period of much concern, but will be an area of close, detailed investigation during the crew inspection
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post May 31 2008, 09:58 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1582
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (mars loon @ May 31 2008, 04:36 PM) *
this is likely after the period of much concern, but will be an area of close, detailed investigation during the crew inspection


Incidentally, they'll have to wait until they pick the boom system up at the station-- it wouldn't fit in the bay with Kibo. It's too bad there will likely be more concern on this launch.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mars loon
post May 31 2008, 10:21 PM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Princeton, NJ, USA
Member No.: 212



At a NASA press conference on going at this moment, Bill Gerstenmaier just said "the foam strike is not of much concern". But off course they will check it throughly after picking up the OBSS at the ISS, during the back flip, etc
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 1 2008, 05:21 PM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



TPS inspections are complete for today. They're having to make do without the OBSS (the sensor boom) for this inspection due to the size of Kibo.

Tomorrow we dock!


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jun 2 2008, 04:10 PM
Post #21


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



For those who missed Saturday's Discovery/ET flyover of Europe...



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jun 2 2008, 04:52 PM
Post #22


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Discovery approaching ISS right now... gorgeous pix on NASA TV...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/nasa/index.html



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jun 2 2008, 05:06 PM
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



I notice the solar panels are still aligned differently on opposite ends of the station.
Anyone know when that is planned to be fixed?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 2 2008, 05:38 PM
Post #24


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



QUOTE (alan @ Jun 2 2008, 12:06 PM) *
I notice the solar panels are still aligned differently on opposite ends of the station.
Anyone know when that is planned to be fixed?


This is done on purpose to protect the arrays from docking and undocking vehicles. The Russian vehicles have their arrays 'feathered' as well right now, as are some of the radiators.

The overall SARJ issue (the massive joint that rotates the starboard array) has not yet been resolved, though. There will be an attempt to clean the joint during this docked mission, and work will continue beyond that throughout the year.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 2 2008, 05:47 PM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Discovery is within 150 feet of docking. They are in an orbital night right now, but the features within the payload bay can be made out.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 2 2008, 06:05 PM
Post #26


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Discovery has successfully docked to the ISS.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 2 2008, 07:42 PM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



And now with hatch opening the crews can finally come together.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 3 2008, 02:32 PM
Post #28


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Today is the mission's first EVA. Tasks on hand:

  • Release the straps from the Shuttle robotic arm elbow camera
  • Transfer the OBSS from Station to Shuttle
  • Inspect the starboard SARJ
  • Reinstall trundle bearing assembly into the SARJ
  • Demonstrate cleaning technique on SARJ
  • Prepare Kibo for installation on Station


This EVA is scheduled to start in about an hour, and scheduled to last 6 1/2 hours.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kspace
post Jun 3 2008, 04:22 PM
Post #29


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 17-November 07
From: in a IA corn field
Member No.: 3963



Has anyone else seen this article?

http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/08060...39a-damage.html

or seen anymore pictures of the damage?

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


Of all the launches I have seen I have never seen damage to the pad like this. Could it just be the aging pad or was it the fact they were taking the larges element to the station? Would they have needed more power at liftoff because of Kibo's weight?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 3 2008, 04:26 PM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



They're trying to figure it out as we speak. The structure was old, initially built in the 60's. And Kibo is certainly a heavier payload, but not the heaviest payload even since return to flight.

But yeah, your assessment is pretty much the same as those close to the program. Never seen such damage before.

(edited to remove quote)


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th April 2024 - 01:02 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.