Do you have a list of stereo pairs that could be processed? ISS images usually process pretty quickly in ASP and would make a fun test case for me. I could then share my results back to you via this thread.

Quote removed - Mod

You could also use Hugin for a normal mosaic.

http://hugin.sourceforge.net/

In the past (3 years ago), I had bad experiences with the software. Now-a-days it's actually pretty awesome and can stitch things together automatically. You can also swap out the automatic tie point software with whatever you like.

Hey UMSF,

You guys might find this interesting even after DLR/ASU just finished an epic LRO-WAC DEM.

http://byss.ndc.nasa.gov/stereopipeline/da...ollo_metric.kml

The above is a KML where you can view a Digitial Elevation Mosaic (DEM) and Digital Image Mosaic (DIM) that was created from about 4000 Apollo Metric Images. The final results are mosaics that cover about 18% of the Moon at 1024 pixels per degree with an average accuracy about 40 meters when compared to LOLA.

I wish this paper had more content. Yet that doesn't take away the multiview stereo coolness.

Does Leberl know that on Mars we don't use frame cameras? He's response seems to be that he expecting a simple pinhole model.

Not quite 11, but USGS covered Apollo 15 when working with the Apollo Pan Cam.

http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/webgis/

Someday, I'd like to work with that data set.

Wow! That's some gorgeous work you have there.

Okay fine. I'll bug Trent next week when I see him. A while back MSSS did work with Larry Edwards that involved ASP. Since the open source release his custom camera models for MOCNA and CTX are no longer a part of our software. We now use ISIS to provide those. I hope to get this all worked out as a lot of our users are creating 3D models from CTX.

Care to elaborate on what is wrong with the CTX models? It might be an easy fix to send to the ISIS developers as our camera models are their camera models.