IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Question about reseau marks.
J.J.
post Apr 18 2010, 03:50 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 22-March 06
Member No.: 722



In a lot of old pictures--Voyager and earlier--these markings are prominent in raw imagery. From Galileo onward, though I've not seen them; what has changed in imaging systems to render them unnecessary?

Thanks in advance!


--------------------
Mayor: Er, Master Betty, what is the Evil Council's plan?

Master Betty: Nyah. Haha. It is EVIL, it is so EVIL. It is a bad, bad plan, which will hurt many... people... who are good. I think it's great that it's so bad.

-Kung Pow: Enter the Fist
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Apr 18 2010, 03:55 PM
Post #2


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



The shift form Vidicon tubes to CCD's.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tasp
post Apr 18 2010, 06:24 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 903
Joined: 30-January 05
Member No.: 162



To expand on that a bit,

in CCD sensors, the pixels are physically fixed in size and position. With the old style vacuum tube technology, the scale of the image would vary somewhat with the brightness of the image. If you have noticed on picture tube TV sets vertical lines bending in their proximity to other bright and dark areas in the picture, a similar effect occurs in the vidicon tube. The brighter a region of brightness, the more charge is 'read' by the scanning electron beam that records the picture, but the beam is also slightly deflected by that charge too. The electron beam in the vidicon is rastered across the image by externally applied magnetic fields, the local variations in charge (due to brightness) on the image can also deflect the beam slightly. If you want to precisely measure the relationship of various features to each other in a vidicon, the reseau marks provide a fixed grid for this purpose as they are physically present on the vidicon sensor and are immune to shifts in position due to the vagaries of the brightness and resulting charge in the picture.

A recent development in picture tube TV technology shortly before LCD, DLP, plasma, etc took over was something called scan velocity modulation. This is essentially the converse of the vidicon tube problem. Here though, the electron beam is slowed as it 'writes' the bright areas of the picture and accelerated as it does the darker portions. (and here slowed and accelerated refer to the transverse velocity of the beam, not the speed of the electrons moving down the beam) This makes the bright areas brighter, and the dark areas darker, thus improving the contrast (and hopefully the realism) of the televised scene. Turning a 'problem' into a 'feature' is one of the main drivers in the advancement of technology that allows for ever more capable spacecraft to be designed and launched, and for the supporting technology we use here to study the results.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
J.J.
post Apr 18 2010, 10:36 PM
Post #4


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 22-March 06
Member No.: 722



Thanks much, folks! smile.gif


--------------------
Mayor: Er, Master Betty, what is the Evil Council's plan?

Master Betty: Nyah. Haha. It is EVIL, it is so EVIL. It is a bad, bad plan, which will hurt many... people... who are good. I think it's great that it's so bad.

-Kung Pow: Enter the Fist
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JohnVV
post Apr 20 2010, 06:03 AM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 890
Joined: 18-November 08
Member No.: 4489



a good tool for removing them ( besides ISIS)
is the Gimp add on tool G'mic
the "hot pixel filter" dose a very good job
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 16th May 2024 - 03:02 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.