Dust Storm- Opportunity EOM, the end of the beginning of a new era in robotic spaceflight |
Dust Storm- Opportunity EOM, the end of the beginning of a new era in robotic spaceflight |
Sep 17 2018, 05:55 AM
Post
#241
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 507 Joined: 10-September 08 Member No.: 4338 |
The DSN Now display shows 4 antennas at each complex. However, there may actually be more than 4. For example, Goldstone seems to have 8.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldstone_Dee...omplex#Antennas Are the antennas that are not displayed idle, or are they doing stuff that we can't see, such as attempts to transmit commands to Opportunity? This might explain why we don't see the every-day attempts discussed in the most recent MER press release. QUOTE With more sunlight reaching the rover's solar array, the Opportunity team at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, are increasing the frequency of commands it beams to the 14-plus-year-old rover via the dishes of NASA's Deep Space Network from three times a week to multiple times per day. [EDIT] Uplink to MER1 from Goldstone now (12:30am). Maybe the action just happens while I'm asleep... |
|
|
Sep 17 2018, 03:18 PM
Post
#242
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2018, 07:53 AM
Post
#243
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 282 Joined: 18-June 04 Member No.: 84 |
There's a good chance that the first signals will only be seen in radio science recordings, which won't show up in the realtime DSN status anyway. arggh you're right, was just watching the DSN status page and their twitter page, and another false alarm, this time with Maven. edit: Here is the History of MAVEN from the DSN status twitter feed https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&q=M...us&src=typd And Opportunity's last DSN comm from June 10th? https://twitter.com/dsn_status/status/1005823559166459908 |
|
|
Sep 18 2018, 08:02 AM
Post
#244
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 470 Joined: 24-March 04 From: Finland Member No.: 63 |
Well, that momentary carrier lock at 8.4351GHz was a lot closer to the expected Oppy frequency (8.4358GHz you pointed before), than Maven's 8.4454GHz... But yeah, maybe it's the doppler shift around the orbit.
-------------------- Antti Kuosmanen
|
|
|
Sep 18 2018, 03:20 PM
Post
#245
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
-148dBm is FAR too strong for a MER LGA on the surface. That last DSN Now entry was a high gain antenna. Not the low gain that will be used now. Expect something more like -160 dBm.
Honestly - given the idiosyncrasies of how the DSN works - it is unlikely you're gonna be able to identify a successful vehicle recovery via DSN Now. |
|
|
Sep 19 2018, 07:12 AM
Post
#246
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 470 Joined: 24-March 04 From: Finland Member No.: 63 |
DSN has brought out the big guns tonight. The 70 metre DSS 14 "Mars" in action with MER1 now
-------------------- Antti Kuosmanen
|
|
|
Sep 19 2018, 08:37 AM
Post
#247
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 282 Joined: 18-June 04 Member No.: 84 |
DSN has brought out the big guns tonight. The 70 metre DSS 14 "Mars" in action with MER1 now Still up linking, although it did disappear for about 15 minutes then come back. EDIT: About 2 hours now, maybe trying to cover the whole window where Oppy might be awake with the larger antenna? |
|
|
Sep 23 2018, 06:01 AM
Post
#248
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 507 Joined: 10-September 08 Member No.: 4338 |
Expect something more like -160 dBm. That would be lower even than the signal strength from the Voyagers at around 10 billion miles! https://twitter.com/dsn_status/status/1043512420768120833 https://twitter.com/dsn_status/status/1043219216659361793 Admittedly, they would be using high-gain antennas and the bit rate is around 160 b/sec. https://twitter.com/dsn_status/status/1043220222327627776 |
|
|
Sep 23 2018, 03:54 PM
Post
#249
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14431 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
That would be lower even than the signal strength from the Voyagers at around 10 billion miles! The Voyagers all transmit with large high gain antennas that are VERY directional and pointed at Earth. At X Band they have a beam width of half a degree and 48db of gain. Opportunity will be using its low gain antenna that transmits to 180 degrees of the sky and has only 7 dB of gain Physics is mean like that. |
|
|
Sep 23 2018, 06:47 PM
Post
#250
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4246 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
In defence of physics, I've never known it to be mean. It just doesn't care.
|
|
|
Sep 24 2018, 02:19 AM
Post
#251
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 507 Joined: 10-September 08 Member No.: 4338 |
Hypothetically, if the low gain transmitter were non-functional, but the receiver and other communication assets (UHF, high gain) were ok, could the rover still be recovered? From a practical standpoint, would recovery be unlikely in that case?
|
|
|
Sep 24 2018, 02:53 AM
Post
#252
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2504 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Hypothetically, if the low gain transmitter were non-functional, but the receiver and other communication assets (UHF, high gain) were ok, could the rover still be recovered? There's only one X-band transmitter (though there are redundant solid-state power amplifiers) that can be switched between the LGA and the HGA. The HGA can't be pointed at the Earth in a clock fault because the rover doesn't know what time it is and therefore where the Earth is. So the HGA path is useless for recovery unless the clock can be updated. See https://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/DPSummary/MER...cmp20051028.pdf Figure 3-1 on page 17. In theory both transmit and receive could happen via the UHF. With a clock fault, though, the exact time of UHF comm windows is moving around in a hard-to-predict manner and it's unlikely that an orbiter pass will happen to coincide with one of these windows, though I expect this is being tried. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Sep 25 2018, 06:42 PM
Post
#253
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2917 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
Hi Oppy, we can at least see you again: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7245
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 25 2018, 08:24 PM
Post
#254
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2073 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Glad to see the old girl... a poignant image if there ever was one!
|
|
|
Sep 26 2018, 01:09 AM
Post
#255
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 07:57 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |