IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Charon Occultation, New Nature Paper
SigurRosFan
post Jan 5 2006, 03:09 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0601/04charon/ - Rare opportunity seized to measure Pluto's large moon

--- In a paper released in the January 5, 2006, edition of Nature, the MIT-Williams collaboration determined Charon's radius to be 606 ± 8 km. For perspective, this radius is roughly twice the width of Massachusetts with an error of only 5 miles. The size was combined with mass measurements from Hubble Space Telescope data to establish a density for Charon of 1.72 g/cm3. This density, roughly 1/3 that of the Earth, reflects Charon's rocky-icy composition.

"We also find that Charon contains roughly 10% less rock by mass than Pluto. This difference suggests that either, or both, objects involved in a Charon-forming collision had concentrations of heavier materials in their cores." A collisional formation like this has a parallel in theories for the formation of the Earth-Moon system.---


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SigurRosFan
post Jan 5 2006, 04:04 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 24-August 05
Member No.: 471



VLT press release:

http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2006/pr-02-06.html - Measuring the Size of a Small, Frost World

--- This accuracy now allows astronomers to pin Charon's density down to 1.71 that of water, indicative of an icy body with about slightly more than half of rocks. Quite remarkably, Charon's density is now measured with much more precision than Pluto's. ---


--------------------
- blue_scape / Nico -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tfisher
post Jan 5 2006, 04:41 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 204
Joined: 29-June 05
Member No.: 421



In a Scientific American article on the this, the author states
Similar occultations could provide data on Sedna and 2003UB313. That, in turn, could decide whether they are planets, because the IAU is working on a definition based on minimum size.

I wonder if he has inside information about this -- last time there were rumors the IAU committee on the definition of a planet was nearing a decision, it came to naught. Hmmm...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ljk4-1
post Feb 6 2006, 09:03 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2454
Joined: 8-July 05
From: NGC 5907
Member No.: 430



Astrophysics, abstract
astro-ph/0602082

From: Michael Person [view email]

Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:35:45 GMT (651kb)

Charon's radius and density from the combined data sets of the 2005 July 11 occultation

Authors: M. J. Person, J. L. Elliot, A. A. S. Gulbis, J. M. Pasachoff, B. A. Babcock, S. P. Souza, J. Gangestad

Comments: 25 pages including 4 tables and 2 figures. Submitted to the Astronomical Journal on 2006 Feb 03

The 2005 July 11 C313.2 stellar occultation by Charon was observed by three separate research groups, including our own, at observatories throughout South America. Here, the published timings from the three data sets have been combined to more accurately determine the mean radius of Charon: 606.0 +/- 1.5 km. Our analysis indicates that a slight oblateness in the body (0.006 +/- 0.003) best matches the data, with a confidence level of 86%. The oblateness has a pole position angle of 71.4 deg +/- 10.4 deg and is consistent with Charon's pole position angle of 67 deg.

Charon's mean radius corresponds to a bulk density of 1.63 +/- 0.07 g/cm3, which is significantly less than Pluto's (1.92 +/- 0.12 g/cm3). This density differential favors an impact formation scenario for the system in which at least one of the impactors was differentiated.

Finally, unexplained differences between chord timings measured at Cerro Pachon and the rest of the data set could be indicative of a depression as deep as 7 km on Charon's limb.

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602082


--------------------
"After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance.
I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard,
and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does
not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is
indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have
no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft."

- Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 03:50 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.