Charon Occultation, New Nature Paper |
Charon Occultation, New Nature Paper |
Jan 5 2006, 03:09 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 531 Joined: 24-August 05 Member No.: 471 |
http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0601/04charon/ - Rare opportunity seized to measure Pluto's large moon
--- In a paper released in the January 5, 2006, edition of Nature, the MIT-Williams collaboration determined Charon's radius to be 606 ± 8 km. For perspective, this radius is roughly twice the width of Massachusetts with an error of only 5 miles. The size was combined with mass measurements from Hubble Space Telescope data to establish a density for Charon of 1.72 g/cm3. This density, roughly 1/3 that of the Earth, reflects Charon's rocky-icy composition. "We also find that Charon contains roughly 10% less rock by mass than Pluto. This difference suggests that either, or both, objects involved in a Charon-forming collision had concentrations of heavier materials in their cores." A collisional formation like this has a parallel in theories for the formation of the Earth-Moon system.--- -------------------- - blue_scape / Nico -
|
|
|
Jan 5 2006, 04:04 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 531 Joined: 24-August 05 Member No.: 471 |
VLT press release:
http://www.eso.org/outreach/press-rel/pr-2006/pr-02-06.html - Measuring the Size of a Small, Frost World --- This accuracy now allows astronomers to pin Charon's density down to 1.71 that of water, indicative of an icy body with about slightly more than half of rocks. Quite remarkably, Charon's density is now measured with much more precision than Pluto's. --- -------------------- - blue_scape / Nico -
|
|
|
Jan 5 2006, 04:41 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 204 Joined: 29-June 05 Member No.: 421 |
In a Scientific American article on the this, the author states
Similar occultations could provide data on Sedna and 2003UB313. That, in turn, could decide whether they are planets, because the IAU is working on a definition based on minimum size. I wonder if he has inside information about this -- last time there were rumors the IAU committee on the definition of a planet was nearing a decision, it came to naught. Hmmm... |
|
|
Feb 6 2006, 09:03 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2454 Joined: 8-July 05 From: NGC 5907 Member No.: 430 |
Astrophysics, abstract
astro-ph/0602082 From: Michael Person [view email] Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:35:45 GMT (651kb) Charon's radius and density from the combined data sets of the 2005 July 11 occultation Authors: M. J. Person, J. L. Elliot, A. A. S. Gulbis, J. M. Pasachoff, B. A. Babcock, S. P. Souza, J. Gangestad Comments: 25 pages including 4 tables and 2 figures. Submitted to the Astronomical Journal on 2006 Feb 03 The 2005 July 11 C313.2 stellar occultation by Charon was observed by three separate research groups, including our own, at observatories throughout South America. Here, the published timings from the three data sets have been combined to more accurately determine the mean radius of Charon: 606.0 +/- 1.5 km. Our analysis indicates that a slight oblateness in the body (0.006 +/- 0.003) best matches the data, with a confidence level of 86%. The oblateness has a pole position angle of 71.4 deg +/- 10.4 deg and is consistent with Charon's pole position angle of 67 deg. Charon's mean radius corresponds to a bulk density of 1.63 +/- 0.07 g/cm3, which is significantly less than Pluto's (1.92 +/- 0.12 g/cm3). This density differential favors an impact formation scenario for the system in which at least one of the impactors was differentiated. Finally, unexplained differences between chord timings measured at Cerro Pachon and the rest of the data set could be indicative of a depression as deep as 7 km on Charon's limb. http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0602082 -------------------- "After having some business dealings with men, I am occasionally chagrined,
and feel as if I had done some wrong, and it is hard to forget the ugly circumstance. I see that such intercourse long continued would make one thoroughly prosaic, hard, and coarse. But the longest intercourse with Nature, though in her rudest moods, does not thus harden and make coarse. A hard, sensible man whom we liken to a rock is indeed much harder than a rock. From hard, coarse, insensible men with whom I have no sympathy, I go to commune with the rocks, whose hearts are comparatively soft." - Henry David Thoreau, November 15, 1853 |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th March 2024 - 03:50 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |