Juno Perijove 15, September 07, 2018 |
Juno Perijove 15, September 07, 2018 |
Sep 8 2018, 12:09 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 12 2018, 01:06 AM
Post
#2
|
|||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
#32, and #33:
Btw., I've completed the calibration milestone. But the above images have been rendered with the parameters I've provided after the posts with the part 1 uploads. Results of the new calibration iteration step are: focal length 1482.29 pixels, optical center (809.09; 609.20), rotation around optical axis 0.00145 radians, K1=-5.75E-8, K2=2.73E-14. The origin (0; 0) of the applied frame is the lower left corner pixel of the CCD (the side with the red filter). But I think, that it's still possible, that the corners of the CCD are off up to 10 pixels with this approximation. However, that's outside the readout regions. Nevertheless, I'll try to narrow this further down with higher-order approximations. |
||
|
|||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2024 - 09:32 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |