Most Interesting/Most Boring Objects in the Solar |
Most Interesting/Most Boring Objects in the Solar |
Jun 7 2007, 07:07 AM
Post
#1
|
|
SewingMachine Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 27-September 05 From: Seattle Member No.: 510 |
Yes, it's time to Rock the Inner Geek and proclaim your love for what you consider to be what's hot and what's...well, boring in terms of planetary excitement. Criteria may include dynamicism, color, scale, grandeur, crater-counting wrist torture, budgetary reality, and whatever else you might consider relevant. I'll open with my own picks, without giving any particular reasons. (Earth can count if you like)
In descending order... Most Interesting: 1.) Io 2.) Titan 3.) Europa 4.) Enceladus 5.) Mars 6.) Triton 7.) Venus 8.) Pluto 9.) Dione 10. Iapetus Least Interesting: 1.) Rhea 2.) Luna 3.) Mercury 4.) Oberon 5.) Mimas 6.) Tethys 7.) Callisto 8.) Ganymede 9.) Earth 10.) New Jersey -------------------- ...if you don't like my melody, i'll sing it in a major key, i'll sing it very happily. heavens! everybody's all aboard? let's take it back to that minor chord...
Exploitcorporations on Flickr (in progress) : https://www.flickr.com/photos/135024395@N07/ |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 07:24 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
hehe
Most Interesting: 1) Io 2) Titan 3) Triton 4) Enceladus 5) Venus 6) Earth 7) Miranda 8) Ganymede 9) Vesta 10) Pluto Least Interesting: 1) Europa 2) Mars 3) Tethys 4) Rhea 5) Callisto 6) Mars 7) Mercury 8) Charon (in my mind, it looks exactly like Rhea) 9) The Moon 10) Pasiphae (EDITL Replaced Hati with the Moon) -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 07:49 AM
Post
#3
|
|
SewingMachine Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 27-September 05 From: Seattle Member No.: 510 |
Bonus points for listing Mars twice, and equating Charon with Rhea is thought-provoking. Europa provokes deathmatch in the alley behind Pizza Hut of your choice. I'm slow and uncoordinated, so play nice.
-------------------- ...if you don't like my melody, i'll sing it in a major key, i'll sing it very happily. heavens! everybody's all aboard? let's take it back to that minor chord...
Exploitcorporations on Flickr (in progress) : https://www.flickr.com/photos/135024395@N07/ |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 08:26 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 11-December 04 Member No.: 120 |
My list, kind of search-for-life centered I think....
Most: 1.Exo planets 2.Mars 3.Enceladus 4.Titan 5.Europa 6.All other, except... Least: 1.Low Earth Orbit 2 to 10.The Moon |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 08:56 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Most interesting:
Earth Titan Mars Venus Sedna Ganymede Europa Io Triton Iapetus I refuse to name boring ones - there aren't any. |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 09:03 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Subotica Member No.: 384 |
I can't believe that some of you put Moon in the "Most boring" part of your lists...
Here's my list. I will put no numbers because they are all most interesting in they own way. Most Interesting: Io Jupiter Mars Europa Titan Moon (buy yourself a telescope) Enceladus Iapetus All Asteroids/Comets (Ida,Gaspra,Eros,Itokawa,Tempel 1,Halle-Bopp...) Sun This list does not contain Ceres,Vesta,Lutetia or Pluto because they are not explored/seen by spacecrafts yet but they are damn interesting to me... Most boring: Sorry but I cannot think of any Solar System object that would easily fit here... -------------------- The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr... |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 10:15 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
I can't think of a single body in the solar system that I'd find boring.
Doug |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 11:57 AM
Post
#8
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2251 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
I echo what Doug said (and no, I'm not forgetting about Rhea).
Interesting ones in very approximate/crude order by how interesting they seem: Titan Io Jupiter Europa Saturn Enceladus Triton Uranus (!) Venus Mars Neptune Vesta Pluto Miranda I was unable to limit myself to only 10 bodies. |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 12:19 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 470 Joined: 24-March 04 From: Finland Member No.: 63 |
As most interesting: Comets! Possibly the most active orbiting objects in the solar system. Especially Churyumov- Gerasimenko with the arrival of Rosetta. I cried after observing the many seperate components of the comet Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 and realising only afterwards that it would have been the target of the (failed) COUNTOUR mission.
-------------------- Antti Kuosmanen
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 12:41 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 710 Joined: 28-September 04 Member No.: 99 |
From most to least interesting:
Terra Titan Mars Venus ( I'm sure, were there pretty MER-like surface panoramas, it would be very popular ) Triton Io Enceladus Europa Miranda Ganymede Luna .......all known asteroids Dione Ariel Titania Callisto ( the fact that it's 'melting' saves it from total boredom ) Mercury Iapetus ( it's Rhea's twin sister. Only with lousy make-up and a love handle around the waist ) Oberon Umbriel Tethys Mimas ( that whole death-star routine doesn't fool me ) a frozen corpse in the morgue Rhea |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 01:20 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4404 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
I started with a list, but I realized that there were no major moons, planets, or kuiperoids I left off. I have dificulty with the "boring" thing. Rhea, for example, isn't all that exciting in and of itself, buut understanding why it evolved so much differently than Dione, with Tethys in the middle, is fascinating.
-------------------- |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 01:57 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 509 Joined: 2-July 05 From: Calgary, Alberta Member No.: 426 |
Well, here we go.
Most interesting: Titan, Mars, Io, Europa, Triton, Saturn's rings, Iapetus, Enceladus, Miranda, Venus. honorable mention: Hyperion, Ganymede, Ariel, Luna, Vesta (#11-15) Least inspiring: Rhea, Tethys, Oberon, Umbriel, Uranus, Mercury, Saturn proper, Mimas, Ceres, Dione. And making up a new category: Most interesting *for its size*: Hyperion, with Enceladus and Miranda close behind (Phobos, too). Least interesting *for its size*: Saturn. Something with 95 Earth masses can do better. Uranus is a close second, though. |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 02:23 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Least interesting *for its size*: Saturn. Something with 95 Earth masses can do better. Uranus is a close second, though. You can't blame the planet for high altitude hazes obscuring interesting cloud dynamics. Blame the temperature!For me, I can't really select favorite places in the solar system because each of the places is unique, but I can select a random few I find Moon, Mercury, Mimas, Rhea, Uranus (though the equinox did bring some life to it). Tethys and Dione.. well, they're also dull, but Dione has a dark stain and "wispy" terrain and Tethys has the orangish splat so from an imaging standpoint it pulls them out of the brink for me. There's also a few Uranian moons I find less than awe-inspiring but at least they're brownish in color! -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 02:36 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 257 Joined: 18-December 04 Member No.: 123 |
Quote of the Day for ugordan!
"You can't blame the planet for high altitude hazes obscuring interesting cloud dynamics. Blame the temperature!" Only at UMSF, classic -------------------- Turn the middle side topwise....TOPWISE!!
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 02:51 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
The ironic part is I included Uranus in the boring list and yet the same don't blame it statement could be said about that planet as well.
-------------------- |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 03:07 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
I find the denigration of Ceres as an object of interest to be puzzling. The fact that so little is known, yet before long we are about to find out so much is what is drawing me. Let's face it, the most interesting item in your house when you were a kid was an unwrapped Christmas present the day before Christmas. Those vague tantalizing Hubble images just add to the excitement -- as thought the present was wrapped with slightly transparent paper.
Right now Ceres is the MOST interesting object in the Solar System. If I had to list an uninspiring object, I'd have to say it would be Comet Kohoutek, but then most of you kids won't remember that big let-down. -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 04:05 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 754 Joined: 9-February 07 Member No.: 1700 |
Most dull and uninteresting object in the solar system? Paris Hilton
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 05:06 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1281 Joined: 18-December 04 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 124 |
QUOTE (Toma B @ Jun 7 2007, 02:03 AM) I can't believe that some of you put Moon in the "Most boring" part of your lists... Well, the most boring was done by Apollo and the Lunakhod missions on the moon.... but I don't think that's what he meant. I have to agree that the question "What is the most boring object in the solar system?" doesn't make sense to me, unless we stretch the definition of objects to include television about celebrity heiresses. EDIT - DOH - brellis beat me to it..... -------------------- Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 05:47 PM
Post
#19
|
|
SewingMachine Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 27-September 05 From: Seattle Member No.: 510 |
I clearly could have phrased the topic/question better. Absolutely true that each world is fascinating in it's own right, but I was aiming for personal tastes. ( I've spent a fairly disporportionate amount of time sorting and staring at pictures of Rhea ) An entirely seperate poll based on percentage of hard drive space occupied would paint a different picture too.
-------------------- ...if you don't like my melody, i'll sing it in a major key, i'll sing it very happily. heavens! everybody's all aboard? let's take it back to that minor chord...
Exploitcorporations on Flickr (in progress) : https://www.flickr.com/photos/135024395@N07/ |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 06:07 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Now, see, I'm in the camp that every solar system object is interesting. I think Luna is *tremendously* interesting -- all you guys and gals who think that samples returned from eight sites, and varying degrees of in-situ measurements from another six or seven, means we know everything we need to know about the place, are just plain misguided... Luna is more the norm than the exception in this system, and we can learn a LOT more from it that will apply to other bodies, such as Mercury and the asteroids.
There are very definite classifications of bodies, too, each of which holds its own fascination. Vacuum-shrouded rocky bodies; rocky bodies with atmospheres; small rocky bodies; small icy bodies; large gas bodies; and large ice and gas bodies. Each has its own general set of processes, each has its own general set of geological conditions. (Titan, as a small icy body with an atmosphere, is sort of in a class by itself...) Even Rhea, with the interesting organization of its crater chains, holds some interest for me. I'm still convinced that a lot of Rhea's crater chains are endogenically controlled... -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 06:18 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2785 Joined: 10-November 06 From: Pasadena, CA Member No.: 1345 |
My preferences based on hard drive storage percentages:
58% Titan 20% Europa/Ganymede/Callisto 17% Mars 3% Exoplanets 1% Enceladeus 1% Venus -Mike -------------------- Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 07:01 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
LOL let me try that out. No percentages, just the raw numbers. I should also point out that this is on my laptop, not my work computer as that would skew Titan's numbers considerably...
Io: 5.39 GB Ganymede: 15.4 MB Titan: 1.30 GB Enceladus: 717 MB Rhea: 35.8 MB Dione: 92.6 MB Tethys: 64.8 MB Saturn: 18.2 MB Phoebe: 18.0 MB Mimas: 11.8 MB Iapetus: 62.1 MB Triton: 14.0 MB -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 07:18 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
There's a slight hint of you being an Io fan right there.
-------------------- |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 08:10 PM
Post
#24
|
|
SewingMachine Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 27-September 05 From: Seattle Member No.: 510 |
(Expletive deleted), that really does skew the balance!!!
Mars 6.56gb Terra 1.54gb Europa 1.22gb Titan 843mb Luna 751mb Venus 496mb Io 352mb Saturn 302mb Mercury 291mb Enceladus 234mb -------------------- ...if you don't like my melody, i'll sing it in a major key, i'll sing it very happily. heavens! everybody's all aboard? let's take it back to that minor chord...
Exploitcorporations on Flickr (in progress) : https://www.flickr.com/photos/135024395@N07/ |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 08:52 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 160 Joined: 4-July 05 From: Huntington Beach, CA, USA Member No.: 429 |
Most Interesting:
1) Europa 2) Titan 3) Mars 4) Ganymede 5) Ceres 6) Venus 7) Io 8) Eris 9) Vesta 10) Sedna I just cannot call anything boring. If it seems boring, it means we know too little about it to be intrigued. |
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 11:26 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
What's very telling is VP's space allocated to Mars, which would be not so much as a single bit...
My top ten, in descending order (I don't store many images, actually): 1. Titan 2. Mars 3. Io 4. Europa 5. Triton 6. Enceladus 7. Miranda 8. Hyperion 9. Luna 10. Puck My bottom ten: 1. Rhea 2. Rhea 3. Rhea...(well, you get the idea...) I feel kind of sorry for any future colonists from there; Rhea is definitely the North Dakota of the Solar System. All that said, I agree with ElkGroveDan; Dawn may (in fact, almost certainly will) reveal some real surprises from Ceres and Vesta...to say nothing of the Pluto system from NH. Many lists will be reshuffled! -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 12:54 AM
Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
What's very telling is VP's space allocated to Mars, which would be not so much as a single bit... I do have the USGS labeled Europa map... QUOTE 3. Rhea...(well, you get the idea...) I feel kind of sorry for any future colonists from there; Rhea is definitely the North Dakota of the Solar System. And Io is the Texas of the Solar System, and Mars and Europa can fight over the title of California of the Solar System. Titan is a combination of Minnesota and Arizona. QUOTE All that said, I agree with ElkGroveDan; Dawn may (in fact, almost certainly will) reveal some real surprises from Ceres and Vesta...to say nothing of the Pluto system from NH. Many lists will be reshuffled! I have included Vesta, Pluto, and Charon on my lists. Though to be honest, I fear Vesta will be like a mini-Moon, only with a giant hole at the South Pole - heavily cratered with mare filling in some of the larger impact basins. My listing of Pluto and Charon are based on my own imaginings of those two worlds. I imagine Pluto as a cross between Triton and Dione. Imagine Dione's varying crater density, fracture systems, but with Triton's polar caps and volatile cycle. I imagine Charon as much like Rhea, with a large impact basin in the northern part of its leading hemisphere.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 01:01 AM
Post
#28
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
You sure Io isn't the Hawaii of the Solar System? Mauna Loa, after all...
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 01:22 AM
Post
#29
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 723 Joined: 13-June 04 Member No.: 82 |
I am taking a similar post I made here several years ago, which was about my personal 'top 12' moons, and adding in planets and minor planets as appropriate. The top 10 in that combined list are as follows:
1: Titan 2: Earth 3: Europa 4: Venus 5: Io 6: Mars 7: Triton 8: Jupiter 9: Neptune 10: Luna Bill |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 07:10 AM
Post
#30
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
"...If I had to list an uninspiring object, I'd have to say it would be Comet Kohoutek...."
Hey!.. I SAW Khoutek... 6" home assembled Edmonds telescope. Most boring object in the solar system... At the moment: PARIS HILTON! |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 07:45 AM
Post
#31
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 599 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 476 |
Based on where I would like to see umsf craft go further explore --
1. Titan 2. Mars 3. Enceladus 4. Europa 5. Io 6. Vesta 7. Ceres 8. Triton 9. Pluto 10. Miranda Boring: I have to agree with most of the folks here, Rhea. Hey, Paris Hilton was the leadoff story on network news tonight. If you can't beat them, I'd say join them. Let's rename Opportunity as Paris Hilton! Ducks. |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 07:52 AM
Post
#32
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Subotica Member No.: 384 |
Least inspiring: Rhea, Tethys, Oberon, Umbriel, Uranus, Mercury, Saturn proper, Mimas, Ceres, Dione. How can you say that for Ceres when it has not been imaged better than 30km/pix... From what I can see in these HST images it is very intersting. I can't wait for Dawn to do some up close inspection... QUOTE A study led by Peter Thomas of Cornell University suggests that Ceres has a differentiated interior: observations coupled with computer models suggest the presence of a rocky core overlain with an icy mantle. This mantle of thickness from 120 to 60 km could contain 200 million cubic kilometres of water, which is more than the amount of fresh water on the Earth. -------------------- The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr... |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 09:39 AM
Post
#33
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
That's the flaw in this debate. What is intrigue, what is interesting etc. The less we know about something (up to a point) , the more intriguing it becomes. The Columbia Hills were a point of intrigue when we landed, then they became interesting after we arrived.
Ceres is certainly full of intrigue right now - with the tiny HST images just saying "look - I could be all sorts of things - come see". Does that intrigue defy the realty of what may be an uniteresting world - or can any world not yet explored be considered uninteresting. It's an interesting issue...intruigingly. Doug |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 11:35 AM
Post
#34
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
I have a feeling Ceres can't turn out as boring as Rhea even if it tried. Just look at color/albedo variations in that HST composite. Even if it turns out to be completely ancient geologically, at least visually it'll be interesting.
-------------------- |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 12:31 PM
Post
#35
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
That's the flaw in this debate. What is intrigue, what is interesting etc. I wasn't thinking in terms of a debate, just a light-hearted exchange of highly subjective personal impressions. 'Interesting' to me can mean anything from very familiar but magnificently complex and beautiful (Earth's biosphere) to right-on-the-edge-of-the-observable and pregnant with intriguing possibilities (Sedna). I think another factor that probably influenced my list was the realistic potential for more to be revealed within the next few decades. (How exactly does the machinery of terrestrial life operate? What is consciousness? Is there any sign of life on Mars? Does Titan posess an evolved ecosystem with broken symmetries - chirality? - and sub-systems maintained in stasis but out of equilibrium? Is Sedna the tip of a new iceberg as Pluto has turned out to be? Did it form around the Sun or was it captured from elsewhere? - all questions we can think about addressing now.) One day we may be able to explore the deep interiors of the giant planets. They will be extremely interesting when that time approaches, but in the meantime . . . |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 12:54 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 11-March 04 Member No.: 56 |
Rather than just list "most interesting" objects, it might be helpful to say why they are interesting.
I think a solar system object is more interesting if it has: 1. Presently flowing liquids on its surface (Titan) 2. Formerly flowing surface liquids (Mars) 3. Subsurface liquids (Europa, Mars?) 4. Meteorologically interesting atmosphere (Mars, Titan, Venus; Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune) 5. Present geological/cryological(?) activity (Io, Enceladus - Triton? Venus? Titan??) 6. Past (but not ancient in terms of the age of the Solar System) geological activity (Mars, Venus) 7. Older geological activity with interesting results (Iapetus etc.) So I guess I find a world more interesting if it has something going on, some kind of movement or activity, now -- rains and rivers on Titan, volcanoes on Io, dust devils on Mars. I don't find floating rocks like Jupiter XLIX (or whatever they're up to now) to be particularly interesting. I am not particularly moved by asteroid classifications. The Kuiper Belt leaves me cold. (Joke!) I'm interested to see what NH finds at Pluto, but only on the supposition that it's something more than just a big, frozen iceball. |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 03:33 PM
Post
#37
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 160 Joined: 4-July 05 From: Huntington Beach, CA, USA Member No.: 429 |
Perhaps instead of "most boring objects" we should be talking about "most overrated objects", i.e. those that receive too much attention compared to other objects. I nominate Enceladus for the first spot.
|
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 04:25 PM
Post
#38
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1281 Joined: 18-December 04 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 124 |
Good distinction, Pavel! Which object is unduly hogging the public spotlight?
(Though I might quibble with your first choice for purely aesthetic reasons that will become clearer in a future thread....) -------------------- Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 04:26 PM
Post
#39
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 94 Joined: 22-March 06 Member No.: 722 |
^
Agree with Pavel...I don't think anything in the Solar System is truly boring, but I do think many things are overrated. That said, that doesn't mean I think the overrated places don't have plenty of great science potential. Faves: 1.) Earth (as someone with a lifelong interest in geology, I could never consider the Earth boring) 2.) Jupiter 3.) Europa 4.) Titan 5.) Venus 6.) Uranus 7.) Mercury 8.) Any long-period comet 9.) Any NEO 10.) Iapetus Overrated: 1.) Mars 2.) Enceladus 3.) Io 4.) Phobos 5.) Any short-period comet 6.) Any KBO (except Pluto and Sedna) 7.) Triton 8.) The Moon 9.) Interplanetary dust 10.) Rhea Picking the last two was a real bear... The Sun, main-belt asteroids, Pluto, and Neptune fall in between the two extremes. -------------------- Mayor: Er, Master Betty, what is the Evil Council's plan?
Master Betty: Nyah. Haha. It is EVIL, it is so EVIL. It is a bad, bad plan, which will hurt many... people... who are good. I think it's great that it's so bad. -Kung Pow: Enter the Fist |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 05:51 PM
Post
#40
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Io...overrated.... oohhh, it's on!
Seriously, I am with you on Phobos. Can someone please tell me why the Soviets/Russians were/are so interested in Phobos?!? -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Jun 8 2007, 06:13 PM
Post
#41
|
Guests |
Seriously, I am with you on Phobos. Can someone please tell me why the Soviets/Russians were/are so interested in Phobos?!? Genuine scientific interest combined with a chance for a "first" at Mars (i.e., something the U.S. had not done nor shown much interest in pursuing). |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 09:12 PM
Post
#42
|
||
SewingMachine Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 27-September 05 From: Seattle Member No.: 510 |
This whole exchange gave me another bright idea. This is at a quarter scale and some of the images are placeholders. I'll get the full scale one up at a free hosting site later.
-------------------- ...if you don't like my melody, i'll sing it in a major key, i'll sing it very happily. heavens! everybody's all aboard? let's take it back to that minor chord...
Exploitcorporations on Flickr (in progress) : https://www.flickr.com/photos/135024395@N07/ |
|
|
||
Jun 8 2007, 09:26 PM
Post
#43
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 12-September 05 From: France Member No.: 495 |
Very nice !
|
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 09:33 PM
Post
#44
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
I agree, that's beautiful, but please can we have captions or a key or something? I recognise quite a few of them but not all.
|
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 10:31 PM
Post
#45
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 710 Joined: 28-September 04 Member No.: 99 |
please can we have captions or a key or something? My best guess: Moon, Io, Europa, Tethys, Earth, Venus, Mars, Io, Saturn, Venus, Io, Earth, Enceladus, Europa, Ganymede, Mars, Eros, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Jupiter, Itokawa, Neptune, Saturn, Earth, Mercury, Europa, Dione, Ganymede, Titan, Venus, Sun, Dione, Moon, Rhea, Earth, Earth, Triton, Titan, Enceladus, Mars, Tempel 1, Earth, Callisto, Io, Enceladus, Saturn, Phoebe, Mars, Hyperion, Phobos, Earth, Miranda, Hyperion, Iapetus, Saturn, Mars, Earth, Moon, Earth, Callisto, Ganymede, Titan, Mars, Earth, Earth, Io, Triton, Iapetus, Mars. |
|
|
Guest_AlexBlackwell_* |
Jun 8 2007, 10:32 PM
Post
#46
|
Guests |
|
|
|
Jun 9 2007, 05:19 AM
Post
#47
|
|
SewingMachine Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 27-September 05 From: Seattle Member No.: 510 |
Sorry about the captions, ngunn...OWW is correct on the identifications.I'm a real space cadet, but in a totally different way. The toughest one would probably be the second image on the top row of the Tohil Montes on Io. I love that image in particular, part of a five-frame mosaic from I32 in October 2001. I put it above Everest for the echo effect. I was actually working on a key sheet to go with the poster with the place names included (not like the GRS needs an introduction).
VP, I'll tag-team with JJ against you in the deathmatch just on principle. I did like the "California of the solar system" statement, though. It has the ring of truth. On second thought here...JJ, when has Rhea ever hogged the public spotlight?!? Here? -------------------- ...if you don't like my melody, i'll sing it in a major key, i'll sing it very happily. heavens! everybody's all aboard? let's take it back to that minor chord...
Exploitcorporations on Flickr (in progress) : https://www.flickr.com/photos/135024395@N07/ |
|
|
Jun 9 2007, 07:49 AM
Post
#48
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 710 Joined: 28-September 04 Member No.: 99 |
Sorry about the captions, ngunn...OWW is correct on the identifications. No, I was not. Fourth row, Seventh picture. That's not Earth, It's Titan. And Bottom row, Sixth picture is Venus. Don't be mad, it was late. I'm a real space cadet, but in a totally different way. Maybe 'Space Geek' is a better term. |
|
|
Jun 9 2007, 08:28 AM
Post
#49
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
The toughest one would probably be the second image on the top row of the Tohil Montes on Io. I love that image in particular, part of a five-frame mosaic from I32 in October 2001. Come on, if people didn't know that was the peak of Tohil Mons just to the southeast of Radagast Patera, well, then I just can't help them. I did have some difficult telling on some images whether they were of Mars, or a desert on Earth... -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Jun 9 2007, 12:36 PM
Post
#50
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 20-September 06 From: Hanoi, Vietnam Member No.: 1164 |
Here're my favourite places
1. Titan's seas (imagine the strange waves you'll see) 2. Underground ocean on Europa 3. The Face on Mars, the Inca site, the Dome, the Pyramid... the Cydonia region, Mars 4. The newly found cave on the flank of Arsia Mons, Mars (I wonder what's inside?) 5. Triton 6. Pluto&Charon 7. Iapetus 8. South Pole of the Moon 9. LEO 10. Earth To me there're no boring places in the SS but I'd rather call them my least preferred places to visit |
|
|
Jun 9 2007, 04:37 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 94 Joined: 22-March 06 Member No.: 722 |
VP, I'll tag-team with JJ against you in the deathmatch just on principle. I did like the "California of the solar system" statement, though. It has the ring of truth. On second thought here...JJ, when has Rhea ever hogged the public spotlight?!? Here? Thanks for the backup; I'll need it. As for Rhea, I was really grasping at straws. "Better put *something* there! But what...ah, Rhea! One person in a thousand talks about it." -------------------- Mayor: Er, Master Betty, what is the Evil Council's plan?
Master Betty: Nyah. Haha. It is EVIL, it is so EVIL. It is a bad, bad plan, which will hurt many... people... who are good. I think it's great that it's so bad. -Kung Pow: Enter the Fist |
|
|
Jun 9 2007, 08:29 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
|
|
|
Jun 10 2007, 04:42 AM
Post
#53
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
QUOTE As for Rhea, I was really grasping at straws. "Better put *something* there! But what...ah, Rhea! One person in a thousand talks about it." Ironically, Rhea's about the only body that I can think of that actually looks like what we expected a pre-Voyager outer planet icy moon to look like...what does this fact tell us about what we really know and understand? -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 10 2007, 08:54 AM
Post
#54
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1870 Joined: 20-February 05 Member No.: 174 |
"Ironically, Rhea's about the only body that I can think of that actually looks like what we expected a pre-Voyager outer planet icy moon to look like...what does this fact tell us about what we really know and understand?"
1.) Ice balls (ice and mud, really) can do interesting things if they have energy. Tidal energy was predicted for Io pre-Voyager, but estimates seem to repeatedly be off. The orbital dynamics involved are nonlinear and may be chaotic 2.) It seems likely that colder ice-balls contain "lubricant".. ammonia or something, that helps keep activity "up" as you go outward from Jupiter to Neptune. 3.) There is an imperfect tendency for outer solar system objects to be more active the more reflective they are.. Europa was identified as an ice-ball pre-voyager, based on spectra and albedo, and assumed to be BORING... but it's a self-renewing-surface ice-ball. 4.) Bigger ice balls may be less interesting.. they may hold heat better, but they're often further out and less likely to get tidal heating.. Callisto.. Rhea, Iapetus (fascinating despite no activity), Oberon. |
|
|
Jun 10 2007, 04:19 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 11-March 04 Member No.: 56 |
Rhea is the moon that looks more like any other moon (in the 1000+km range) than it does like itself... that is, if you wanted an image of a generic "solar system moon" that could not be quickly identified as being an individual moon (the way that an image of Io always looks like Io, or that Ganymede, or Triton, or Earth's Moon, have their own distinctive patterns and appearance) you would likely choose Rhea.
|
|
|
Jun 10 2007, 04:45 PM
Post
#56
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
I can't get into the mindset of what's most interesting given what we NEED to know. My list is what is most interesting based on what we do, plus my speculation. My top 25 -- hash marks after #10.
Funny, because my recent thoughts on Ganymede were that it's an interesting world and all that has the problem of being about the tenth most interesting place in the solar system. After sizing everything up, that was about right. Earth Titan Europa Mars Enceladus Io Venus Triton Jupiter Sun - - - Ganymede Saturn Miranda Pluto Iapetus Saturn's rings Neptune Dione Mercury Moon Uranus Tethys Callisto Vesta Amalthea |
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 07:56 AM
Post
#57
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 599 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 476 |
|
|
|
Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
Jun 11 2007, 09:50 AM
Post
#58
|
Guests |
Most interesting:
1. Mars 2. Europa 3. Titan 4. Earth's moon 5. Triton 6. Ceres 7. Pluto 8. Io 9. Phobos 10. Mercury Least interesting 1. Venus ( quite boring, huh ) 2. Uranus ( except the moon Miranda ) |
|
|
Jun 11 2007, 08:00 PM
Post
#59
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
Least interesting 1. Venus ( quite boring, huh ) No way! It's just hard to explore. We might end up finding out that Venus is the second most volcanic body in the solar system, or third if it doesn't beat Earth. There are at least three mysteries regarding its atmosphere, it vomits its innards into a new surface every 700 million years, and we don't know why it has the funny rotation or how it turned out so different from Earth in the first place. And even just taking the geomorphology of today, it's got scads of wrinkly terrains, tessarae and compression, etc. Venus is way above average! As far as we know so far, it clobbers Mercury. |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 05:57 AM
Post
#60
|
|
Director of Galilean Photography Group: Members Posts: 896 Joined: 15-July 04 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 93 |
No way! It's just hard to explore. Venus is probably one of the easiest planets to explore: 1. No extreme radiation environment 2. Easy to reach 3. Has a nice, think, constant atmosphere. Don't need to worry about altitude, or depth/temp varying 4. Nearly earth gravity. 5. Close enough to the sun for solar power in orbit. 6. Close enough to the Earth for high data rates 7. No Great Galactic Ghoul gobbling up spacecraft. 8. ED (not L obviously) testing could be done in your back yard, more or less. 9. Lots of hours of daylight, something like 60 days? (Anyone think up 1 more reason? Top Ten lists have to have, um, ten items. I mean really, what's a little sulfuric acid and 700 K? Just rework your system to work with vacuum tubes and wind up springs and you're good to go. Seriously though, there is lots of good stuff on Venus exploration at the VEXAG website, and in a blog entry Emily did last year at a VEXAG meeting: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/vexag/vexag.html http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00000560/ Their Reports and Conference Reports are pretty informative. I agree with John, Venus is not boring, and has more interesting things to tell us than Mercury. I think there's lots of things worth taking a look at, with short duration landers, or a yo-yo-ing balloon. -------------------- Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
-- "The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality. |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 09:47 AM
Post
#61
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
I'd like to join the 'interesting Venus' lobby. The atmosphere alone would be enough. It's by far the thickest one in our Solar System that we can study all the way from top to bottom. Surface exploration is challenging, but I've no doubt that new materials will some day (soon?) be devised and assembled into a fleet of rovers that are happy in that environment and can conduct detailed geological surveys over extended periods of time. It is a truly wonderful place, and right on our doorstep.
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 05:46 PM
Post
#62
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
The Venus quirk that blocks what would otherwise be the easiest means to explore it are the clouds. Venus would be a hell of a target for Earth-based telescopes, not to mention orbiter imagery, if it weren't for those darned clouds. As a result, if there are smoking plumes of volcanic origin, we can't see them. Whatever vis/IR spectroscopy could do in determining the mineralogy of landforms (a la TES and THEMIS at Mars) -- impossible from above the clouds. Visible-light sounding or star occultation studies of the lower atmosphere -- impossible. So even way up there (over here?) away from the heat, Venus is still tough.
By analogy to Titan, imagine losing all of the ISS/VIMS imagery, leaving you with RADAR and Huygens. That's roughly what we have at Venus. The only solution will be to have aerobots look at the surface beneath the clouds, and doing that on a global basis is inconceivable. I guess eventually, we'll have some aerobots paint "stripes" of vis/IR mapping across long noodles of Venus's map, coloring in representative samples of the terrain types. Assuming such mapping has scientific and not just aesthetic purpose -- which the high temperature makes tough for IR. Monitoring for smoking calderas is a tough problem if they erupt infrequently (think Mount St. Helens). Very tough problem. A one-time visit might be pointless, and monitoring a volcano from a permanent surface station with cameras aimed at the caldera would be a very pricey mission for possibly little return. I would suggest that if a seismographic network is ever put into place that landing VERY near a suspected active volcano or two would be a good idea. |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 05:59 PM
Post
#63
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Venus is an interesting place, yes. It is somewhat more difficult to get to than some other places -- you have to lose a lot of your solar orbital velocity to get there from Earth, it's not as simple as it sounds. And while it has very interesting processes, it takes a lot of power and sophistication to see through the very dense atmosphere to study the surface. So, it's by far not the easiest place in the Solar System to explore.
And there is another factor -- it's a place that humans will likely never visit. The conditions are just too extreme. There is something of a disinclination for people to get interested in places they can never, ever visit. As much as I enjoy unmanned space exploration, it's easier to get people's imaginations fired up if you can get them to visualize standing there, themselves. Seeing it with their own eyes. If that can never realistically happen, it's more difficult for most people to get enthusiastic about it. Oh, I'm assuming you had your tongue fully in your cheek, hendric, with your little list there. Most of the items you list make Venus *more* difficult to explore than other Solar System bodies, not less... -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 06:06 PM
Post
#64
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Why would you need to place the seismic network "VERY" close to a suspected active volcano. As a first shot, you send a network of seismometer spread widely across the surface of Venus. These should be capable of working for about a year or so. This shouldn't be terribly difficult as long as you KISS, and don't add any other gizmos to the lander except the seismometer. This network could be used to identify the regions that are experiencing the most geologic activity by looking for earthquake (or venusquake) swarms. On your next shot to Venus, you send an aerobot to investigate any prime targets identified by the seismic network.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 09:04 PM
Post
#65
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
There is something of a disinclination for people to get interested in places they can never, ever visit. Whilst you make a lot of good points, this is one you've made before (in connection with Titan) and I have once again to register my disagreement. I think this assumption is terribly limiting, and underestimates 'people'. There are really very few places we can currently envisage visiting in the flesh. Meanwhile the universe teems with exotic worlds that are at last coming into our field of view. They are already making headline news and this can only continue as the pace of revelation accelerates. Even if one accepts your premise I don't think it applies particularly forcefully to Venus. It is entirely possible to imagine being on board a Venus orbiter, or even in an aeroplane or airship at high altitude where the pressure and temperature are rather similar to Earth surface values. |
|
|
Jul 2 2007, 03:05 AM
Post
#66
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1276 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
|
|
|
Jul 2 2007, 04:26 AM
Post
#67
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 11-March 04 Member No.: 56 |
Even if one accepts your premise I don't think it applies particularly forcefully to Venus. It is entirely possible to imagine being on board a Venus orbiter, or even in an aeroplane or airship at high altitude where the pressure and temperature are rather similar to Earth surface values. In a sense, there's some value in not being able to land on (or take off from) Venus; it provides a good excuse for doing an interplanetary roundtrip without the added complexity of a landing; which is sort of necessary for the proof-of-concept that human interplanetary travel is possible at all -- which I gather is still debatable. Not having done the math, I might require a little explanation as to why it would be harder to get from Earth to Venus than it is to get back to Earth from Mars; at first thought the complexities of round-trip travel would seem to be comparable, except that Mars is farther away and takes longer to get into favorable configurations. |
|
|
Jul 2 2007, 04:58 AM
Post
#68
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Most 1.) Europa 5.) Iapetus 9.) Dione 10.) Mars Least 1.) Io 9.) Io 10.) And don't forget Io! Someone is getting a lump of coal in their stocking for Christmas... -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Jul 2 2007, 08:39 AM
Post
#69
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 599 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 476 |
Note Decepticon did not state Most WHAT / Least WHAT. It could be Most Interesting / Least Interesting, or it could be Most Boring / Least Boring.
|
|
|
Jul 2 2007, 04:00 PM
Post
#70
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1276 Joined: 25-November 04 Member No.: 114 |
|
|
|
Jul 2 2007, 05:56 PM
Post
#71
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 401 Joined: 5-January 07 From: Manchester England Member No.: 1563 |
In rough order of personal preference:
Earth Titan Venus Mars Europa Sol Io Enceladus Saturn (Rings and wierd looking atmospheric features at its poles) Jupiter Luna Yes I know its eleven, if that bothers any one take out mars for the reasons below. Plus honourable mentions for: Ceres Pluto (and moons) Vesta Chiron Just because ther could be interesting and no ones gone to look yet! Most overrated? Paradoxically I'm gonna have to say mars; yes its fascinating geologically and atmospherically, yes it may have habitatable spots, and I post under it, and, yes I put it in my top ten, but it sometimes gets so much attention I wonder if we haven't all got a bit too hung up over it. -------------------- |
|
|
Nov 7 2007, 05:48 PM
Post
#72
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 655 Joined: 22-January 06 Member No.: 655 |
I've been thinking about this from the point of view of (a) the interest of remote sensing-these objects from a spacecraft or ( actually visiting them, and have plumped for the latter.
Therefore top ten most interesting: 1. Earth - for the sex, beer, music, food, beauty, variety, and not having to wear a space suit whilst enjoying these hedonistic pursuits 2. Titan - possible volcanism, lightning, methane-rapids/rain/flash-floods/lakes and seas 3. Io - for the spectacle of seeing Pele or Loki let rip from a safe distance - also the view of Jupiter from the surface must be awesome. 4. Mars - for the views! Standing on the edge of Valles Marineris, or seeing the other huge volcanoes from the summit of olympus mons 5. Saturn - very dynamic atmosphere, with lightning and hugely powerful winds. The rings in close-up would be phenomenal 6. Europa - for the remote chance of life existing there, a form of possibly ongoing plate tectonics, and again Jupiter would fill the sky 5. Miranda - to run off the top of the 20km high Verona Rupes icecliffs and fall (very slowly) to the bottom. That crazy terrain 7. Triton - on-going spectacular volcanism, possible triton-quakes and again, the views of Neptune would be spectacular 8. Enceladus - ok it has cryo-volcanism, so it is intrinsically interesting but then again, it's not that much bigger than a golf ball..... 9. Venus - probably dead for a while, and a tad inhospitable but geologically a very interesting place to spend some time I reckon 10. Daphnis - probably the best view in the solar system (assuming the rotation is stable and you could stay attached) Honourable mention: Luna - earth meteorite prospecting and other geology has some surprises in store I reckon Top ten most boring: 1. Phoebe - a collection of impact craters held together by very ancient dust 2. Rhea - yes, I concur with most - the solar systems 21st largest object and second most dull 3. Mimas - were it not for Herschel....... 4. Proteus - ditto Phoebe above 5. Larissa - etc etc 6. Mercury - am hoping that Messenger will change my mind - possible comet ice at the poles though.....interesting 7. Deimos - great views but trumped by Phobos 8. Callisto - The largest solar system object to show no signs of anything other than impact gardening 9. Umbriel - Uranus' version of Callisto - two bright craters relieve the utter monotony 10. Hyperion - craters on craters, but dark stuff in the bottom of some, and how weird does this moon look? Honourable mention: Titania - larger than Rhea....slightly more interesting |
|
|
Guest_Geographer_* |
Nov 11 2007, 04:59 PM
Post
#73
|
Guests |
The moons of the outer planets fascinate me the most. Granted most of them are uninterested hunks of rock, but there is such diversity too! I guess Europa is the most intriguing with its hypothesized underground liquid water ocean kept war by tidal forces feeding steam vents.
|
|
|
Nov 11 2007, 06:46 PM
Post
#74
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10164 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Just to correct a surprisingly common misconception...
The "20km high Verona Rupes icecliffs " are not vertical, they are talus slopes at the angle of repose. You would skid and bounce down them, not bungee. The error arose when the images were first released, with the 'cliff' vertical in the image. But the whole image is tilted with respect to the horizontal. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Nov 11 2007, 07:01 PM
Post
#75
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Most interesting object in the solar system: Mars - come on... volcanoes the size of France, a canyon longer than the Atlantic is wide, endless plains of ochre dust, lavendar dawn and dusk skies, life hiding under the rocks or just beneath the surface, destined to be Mankind's next home in space. I rest my case.
Most boring object in the solar system: Howard, off the Halifax adverts. No contest. -------------------- |
|
|
Nov 11 2007, 09:56 PM
Post
#76
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
Here's one for the probably most surprisingly least boring object:
Ariel {In light of the intersting surprises on the Saturnian flock, I suspect Ariel to be a good candidate for most interesting Uranian satellite} |
|
|
Nov 11 2007, 10:56 PM
Post
#77
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 37 Joined: 21-December 05 Member No.: 614 |
My list:
1) Ceres 2) Europa 3) Titan 4) Enceladus 5) Luna 6) Mars 7) Eris 8) Pluto 9) Io 10) Vesta |
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 02:45 AM
Post
#78
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 123 Joined: 21-February 05 Member No.: 175 |
.
|
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 09:22 AM
Post
#79
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 655 Joined: 22-January 06 Member No.: 655 |
The "20km high Verona Rupes icecliffs " are not vertical, they are talus slopes at the angle of repose. You would skid and bounce down them, not bungee. Ok, the solar-system's most inviting ski slope...... This does beg therefore, the question of the location of the solar-system's highest vertical (or near-vertical) cliff: Valles Marineris? 5-7km Herschel on Mimas? At less than a mile, the Earth's highest cliff is not hard to beat. |
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 02:07 PM
Post
#80
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 477 Joined: 2-March 05 Member No.: 180 |
The moons of the outer planets fascinate me the most. Granted most of them are uninterested hunks of rock, but there is such diversity too! I guess Europa is the most intriguing with its hypothesized underground liquid water ocean kept war by tidal forces feeding steam vents. Agreed. I was all hopeful about the Prometheus project allowing for powerful orbiters to be put around Jupiter, but of course that was canceled. Europa's got a young, active surface, and I find those colored cracks especially interesting. (Wouldn't it be incredible if the coloration was from plant-life, killed off by sudden exposure to space?) Whatever the coloration is, it's something welling up from below the icy crust. An orbiter could give more data about Europa, and maybe it could find fresh cracks, where an lander could gain easy access to new material from below the surface. But that's likely a long time away. Too darn much radiation for most of our electronics, too. |
|
|
Nov 12 2007, 08:36 PM
Post
#81
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 59 Joined: 25-December 05 From: Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA Member No.: 619 |
My two main criteria for “most interesting/boring”: A balance of spectacular scenery (including active processes such as geyser, volcanoes and lakes) along with positive prospects for life.
Most interesting: 1. Mars – C’mon now, it’s not even close here - The most earthlike place; diverse topography with views to distant mountains dozens of km away (my prejudices as a “desert rat” who loves Death Valley and the Atacama Desert may be coloring my opinion here), lots of water near the surface, active weather with cool dust devils, and some prospects for present-day life or at least fossils of past life. 2. Europa – A huge ocean lying just a few km down makes life more likely here than anywhere else extra Terra. Downside: Fairly boring surface (and you’d be fried in minutes by radiation). 3. Titan – Exotic hydrocarbon rivers and oceans – What do these look like standing on their banks and shores? Downside: Small prospects for life. 4. Io – Most spectacular volcanic landscape in the solar system. 5. Enceladus and Triton (tie) – Geysers must be great fun to watch from a few km away. We don’t know yet where Pluto, Ceres, etc. will fall out – Perhaps in the Enceladus/Triton class. Most boring: 1. Luna – What a shame earth’s moon isn’t more interesting; had it been so, a much greater impetus would’ve been given to space exploration in the last century or so, and the century or so to follow. Upside: Possible ice at the poles. 2. Mercury – Ditto. Same upside as the moon. 3. Callisto – Jupiter’s Luna surrogate. 4. Rhea – Saturn’s Luna. 5. Venus – For all we know it might’ve been a garden at one time, but the global resurfacing event 100 MYBP and views from Soviet Venera landers show a grim planetscape that most resembles the Kau Desert of Hawai’i. |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 09:52 AM
Post
#82
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 714 Joined: 3-January 08 Member No.: 3995 |
.
|
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 03:12 PM
Post
#83
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
{work with me here}
Rhea's 'boringness' is actually very interesting. Really. Same size as Iapetus, in the same part of the Solar System as Iapetus, and orbits the same planet as Iapetus. Yet it is totally boring. Why ?? It's actually almost as interesting as Iapetus. |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 05:04 PM
Post
#84
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 401 Joined: 5-January 07 From: Manchester England Member No.: 1563 |
I have at least one paper suggesting Rhea may be much more interesting on the inside!
Attached File(s)
-------------------- |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 05:57 PM
Post
#85
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 655 Joined: 22-January 06 Member No.: 655 |
Poor old Rhea (old being the operative word) - Nobody loves saturation cratering on an iceball.
Compared to the glamour moons orbiting either side, she does look like the one to avoid at the party.... I contend though, that in 60 years time or so, when the solar system out as far as Pluto holds no particular surprises for us, most of the asteroids, and a fair few moons will fall well short of Rhea in terms of interesting geology. Every gas or ice giant seems to have a damp squib satellite - Callisto at Jupiter, Umbriel at Uranus and Proteus at Neptune - at least Rhea has some wispy streaks analogous to Dione's.... Here's hoping for a momentous discovery on Rhea following the extended mission very close pass (not holding my breath though.....) |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 07:13 PM
Post
#86
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
Well . . .
An 'active' Ariel might be what has stained our little darkling, Umbriel. Or perhaps it has 'self darkened' from some internal process. Not to sure we should be considering Umbriel 'dull' yet. A 'fresh' crater, Wunda, punching through an outer layer of 'crud' could be vera, vera intresting. |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 08:25 PM
Post
#87
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 655 Joined: 22-January 06 Member No.: 655 |
Agreed.
I think it almost certain that Ariel has been active in recent geologic epochs judging by the surface contortions, and relative lack of impact architecture. However, I can't envisage any process which could work against the gravitational gradient to darken Umbriel. The evidence in the outer solar system seems to point to bright materials/features below the crusts of these bodies, and that any dark material seems to be exogenous in nature (c.f. Iapetus, Dione, Rhea Phoebe etc) With Enceladus in mind, my feeling is that high albedo = recent, and low albedo = ancient as a general rule. Consequently, save a few projectiles punching through the crust, Umbriel is as old as the hills. I agree wholeheartedly though, that no solar system body could be considered 'dull' per se. |
|
|
Jan 15 2008, 10:06 PM
Post
#88
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
I think Rhea's boringness is a psychological artifact. It has everything that Tethys and Dione do, just paler and less exaggerated. It comes down to the opinion of whether a taller cliff is more interesting than a shorter cliff made by the same forces.
|
|
|
Jan 16 2008, 02:35 AM
Post
#89
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 655 Joined: 22-January 06 Member No.: 655 |
Not too sure we should be considering Umbriel 'dull' yet. Having mused on this for a while, and perused some pictures, I'm prepared to admit I may have been a bit hasty in dismissing Umbriel out of hand. Wunda does indeed appear impact-related, but the crater nearer the pole (towards the centre of the image) has a central peak dusted with frost which surely is aeolian - some of the processes here are perhaps analogous to Iapetan geology. In any case, Umbriel becomes infinitely more interesting than your average 30km asteroidal rock. |
|
|
Aug 9 2015, 06:26 PM
Post
#90
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 48 Joined: 10-September 06 Member No.: 1129 |
Bumping this thread in light of recent exploration!
Here's my list -- I’m biased toward worlds that are active, have complex geology, and have striking visual features. 1. Earth (oceans, storms, active volcanism, mountain ranges, tectonics, biodiversity, possibly intelligent life) 2. Io (hundreds of active volcanoes across surface with sulfuric eruptions hundreds of km high, snow, volcanic terrain, mountains) 3. Titan (chemically complex atmosphere, methane precipitation, storms, seas, rivers, dunes) 4. Enceladus (small moon with water eruptions hundreds of km high, powers E-ring, biological potential) 5. Venus (scorching and high-pressure atmosphere, sulfuric acid virga, metallic "snowcapped" mountains, volcanic terrain) 6. Pluto (water mountains, nitrogen glaciers, albedo variation, binary dwarf planet) 7. Triton (solar-powered nitrogen plumes 8 km high, cryovolcanic terrain) 8. Europa (freshly cracked global surface, biological potential) 9. Mars (inert volcanoes, dust storms, carbon dioxide activity in polar cap) 10. Iapetus (yin-yang albedo variation, ancient equatorial ridge) Honorable mentions: Miranda, Jupiter, Saturn, and 67P (on behalf of all comets) |
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 08:17 PM
Post
#91
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
Great list, Superstring, I think you and I would get along just fine I think if you are going for geologically active worlds I would probably put Pluto aside for just a bit. How much its surface looks young as the result of endogenic activity and how much of it is due to exogenic processes like active glaciers remains to be seen. Cthulhu Regio certainly looks quite ancient (with more glacially eroded, cratered terrains to the north of Tombaugh Regio). Right now, I would put Triton above Pluto given its much younger surface (overall).
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Aug 10 2015, 11:50 PM
Post
#92
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 48 Joined: 10-September 06 Member No.: 1129 |
Great list, Superstring, I think you and I would get along just fine I think if you are going for geologically active worlds I would probably put Pluto aside for just a bit. How much its surface looks young as the result of endogenic activity and how much of it is due to exogenic processes like active glaciers remains to be seen. Cthulhu Regio certainly looks quite ancient (with more glacially eroded, cratered terrains to the north of Tombaugh Regio). Right now, I would put Triton above Pluto given its much younger surface (overall). Yeah, that is true -- although I count active glaciers as, well, activity (even if it doesn't involve eruptions). Ranking Pluto higher was splitting hairs. Triton, in the part we've seen, has active geysers and a younger surface overall, but lacks the mountains and glacial flows. They're both fascinating worlds, for sure. |
|
|
Aug 11 2015, 05:13 PM
Post
#93
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 684 Joined: 24-July 15 Member No.: 7619 |
Most interesting, Methone, the Mork-from-Ork moon of Saturn.
It's 1-2 km diameter. weights basically nothing, and is completely unlike any other body in the solar system. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methone_%28moon%29 That image is in focus. E.g., it's not a smooth oval image with a two-tone surface because the picture is out of focus and the light/dark line is a jpeg artifact. It IS a smooth oval with a two tone surface. It has incredibly low mass for the volume it takes up. How light? Rough-back-of-the-envelope calculations- So light that it must be empty space. Snow-fluff, or hollow. Roughly the same volume to weight ratio as an aircraft carrier. |
|
|
Aug 12 2015, 10:58 PM
Post
#94
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1583 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
How much its surface looks young as the result of endogenic activity and how much of it is due to exogenic processes like active glaciers remains to be seen. New press release today about accounting for Pluto's rate of Nitrogen loss, and how endogenic processes might be the source for it... http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/News-Center/News-A...p?page=20150812 and this... https://blogs.nasa.gov/pluto/2015/08/10/atm...lutos-nitrogen/ |
|
|
Aug 16 2015, 10:01 AM
Post
#95
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 423 Joined: 13-November 14 From: Norway Member No.: 7310 |
Hmm, tough task. Of the objects that have been visited, these I find the most interesting:
I am not familiar enough with the science of gas and ice giants to rank Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. List may change radically as new information is learnt about the bodies in the solar system. Most interesting objects that have not been visited yet:
All objects are interesting when the solar system and the universe is viewed as a whole, since they are all pieces of the larger puzzle. But many pieces are almost identical, so in their own right, they might not be that interesting. -------------------- |
|
|
Feb 16 2022, 07:10 PM
Post
#96
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 227 Joined: 13-October 09 From: Olympus Mons Member No.: 4972 |
Sorry to necropost but this is a fun topic
Most interesting: 1. Earth (obviously cause it has the most geologic processes going on at once) 2. Mars (Most extreme terrain aside from perhaps Miranda and possible geologic activity ongoing) 3. Titan (Basically if Earth was made of ice) 4. Venus (Lots of interesting terrain going on) 5. Europa (activity and a form of art) 6. Io (Lots of color and activity) 7. Enceladus (activity) 8. Triton (different types of geologic activity) 9. Miranda (What kind of geologic activity happened here?) 10. Ganymede (Looks like a jigsaw puzzle) Most boring objects: 1. Umbriel (for an object its size, it sure lacks any geologic activity, the whole thing looks like the lunar highlands) 2. Rhea (Dione's less interesting sibling) 3. Mimas (cool you got a crater but geologically boring) 4. Tethys (see 3) 5. Oberon (not much happened here, a couple cool rayed craters is it) 6. Callisto (cool colors, just craters though) 7. Vesta (aside from a couple possible long dead volcanoes, its super dead) 8. Mercury (no color) 9. Moon (no color, maria bump it down from 8) 10-some millions. almost all asteroids and satellites smaller than Vesta and Pallas aside from ringed Centaurs, just a featureless clump of boulders shaped into potatoes that beg to be mapped Stuff we gotta visit: 1. Sedna (coldest thing out there!) 2. Psyche (in progress, iron asteroid!) 3. Chiron (those rings and any possible moons!) 4. 2005 HC4 (this thing probably turns to soft plastic at perihelion) 5. Whatever interstellar comet enters the solar system next 6. Apophis after 2029 Earth encounter (that things gotta have rocks jostled around from tidal interactions) 7. Haumea (lotta bodies to explore at once!) 8. Northern hemisphere of Uranus moons 9. Northern hemisphere of Triton 10. Amalthea when Juno does an end of mission plunge (this thing is redder than Mars!) -------------------- "Thats no moon... IT'S A TRAP!"
|
|
|
Feb 23 2022, 11:00 PM
Post
#97
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10164 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Hi Antdoghalo.
Most of the worlds you say are boring are not really so boring after all. In some cases like Umbriel it's because our images are very poor compared with many other worlds. Better images would probably make it look a lot more interesting, especially the crater with the very bright floor. In other cases you have just not seen the most interesting stuff. Take Mimas as an example. Here are three links that make it look a lot more interesting: https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/1264...false-colors-1/ https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/resources/1492...ater-annotated/ https://www.planetary.org/space-images/closeup-on-herschel In the last one., be sure to click into the high resolution version. Look at the strange albedo markings on the crater wall. There's a lot more going on with Mimas than a quick glance suggests. There are linear grooves which hint at a bit of tectonic activity, and this brand new paper: Rhoden, A.R. and Walker, M.E., 2022. The case for an ocean-bearing Mimas from tidal heating analysis. Icarus, p.114872. suggests the possibility of an internal ocean, rather unexpectedly. So I am going to counter you by suggesting (paraphrasing Larry Soderblom) - there's no such thing as a boring object in the solar system. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2024 - 11:58 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |